Hi Chris, I've done a draft of a uni paper for the Co-operator to relate the theory behind it. Once completed this can be one of the links on the Co-operator page for people who want to look into it.
I've reviewed the paper and shown comments in the attachment.
Chris
> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:34:00 -0700
> Subject: Co-operator Theory Paper
> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> Hi Chris, I've done a draft of a uni paper for the Co-operator to
> relate the theory behind it. Once completed this can be one of the
> links on the Co-operator page for people who want to look into it.
> Hi Alex,
> I've reviewed the paper and shown comments in the attachment.
> Chris
> > From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> > Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:34:00 -0700
> > Subject: Co-operator Theory Paper
> > To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> > Hi Chris, I've done a draft of a uni paper for the Co-operator to
> > relate the theory behind it. Once completed this can be one of the
> > links on the Co-operator page for people who want to look into it.
> > Alex
Critical_Reflection_25.05.09 - chris review.doc
233K
Download
I think it is really getting there. I have some further comments in the attached.
Chris
From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:58:59 -0700
Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
Hi Chris, The attached re-draft has integrated most of your changes fully. Where it hasn't I have put comments in green.
Alex
2009/6/23 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>
Hi Alex,
I've reviewed the paper and shown comments in the attachment.
Chris
> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:34:00 -0700
> Subject: Co-operator Theory Paper
> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> Hi Chris, I've done a draft of a uni paper for the Co-operator to
> relate the theory behind it. Once completed this can be one of the
> links on the Co-operator page for people who want to look into it.
> Hi Alex,
> I think it is really getting there. I have some further comments in the
> attached.
> Chris
> ________________________________
> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:58:59 -0700
> Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> Hi Chris, The attached re-draft has integrated most of your changes fully.
> Where it hasn't I have put comments in green.
> Alex
> 2009/6/23 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>
> Hi Alex,
> I've reviewed the paper and shown comments in the attachment.
> Chris
>> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
>> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:34:00 -0700
>> Subject: Co-operator Theory Paper
>> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
>> Hi Chris, I've done a draft of a uni paper for the Co-operator to
>> relate the theory behind it. Once completed this can be one of the
>> links on the Co-operator page for people who want to look into it.
See comments in the attachment - there are a few suggestions. I think the only substantial thing left to really come to grips with is the idea of the power of the written word in the forum to encourage to group and the individual to really come to an understanding of each other and to find a point of agreement rather than resort to division over points of difference (agreeing to disagree ... this notion is especially patronising and offensive when used by a majority to force a decision and course of action that is disagreeable.)
> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 22:57:38 -0700
> Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> Hi Chris
> see attached
> Alex
> 2009/6/25 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
> > Hi Alex,
> > I think it is really getting there. I have some further comments in the
> > attached.
> > Chris
> > ________________________________
> > From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> > Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:58:59 -0700
> > Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
> > To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> > Hi Chris, The attached re-draft has integrated most of your changes fully.
> > Where it hasn't I have put comments in green.
> > Alex
> > 2009/6/23 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>
> > Hi Alex,
> > I've reviewed the paper and shown comments in the attachment.
> > Chris
> >> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> >> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:34:00 -0700
> >> Subject: Co-operator Theory Paper
> >> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> >> Hi Chris, I've done a draft of a uni paper for the Co-operator to
> >> relate the theory behind it. Once completed this can be one of the
> >> links on the Co-operator page for people who want to look into it.
> Hi Alex,
> See comments in the attachment - there are a few suggestions. I think the
> only substantial thing left to really come to grips with is the idea of the
> power of the written word in the forum to encourage to group and the
> individual to really come to an understanding of each other and to find a
> point of agreement rather than resort to division over points of difference
> (agreeing to disagree ... this notion is especially patronising and
> offensive when used by a majority to force a decision and course of action
> that is disagreeable.)
> Chris
>> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
>> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 22:57:38 -0700
>> Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
>> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
>> Hi Chris
>> see attached
>> Alex
>> 2009/6/25 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
>> > Hi Alex,
>> > I think it is really getting there. I have some further comments in the
>> > attached.
>> > Chris
>> > ________________________________
>> > From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
>> > Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:58:59 -0700
>> > Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
>> > To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
>> > Hi Chris, The attached re-draft has integrated most of your changes
>> > fully.
>> > Where it hasn't I have put comments in green.
>> > Alex
>> > 2009/6/23 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>
>> > Hi Alex,
>> > I've reviewed the paper and shown comments in the attachment.
>> > Chris
>> >> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
>> >> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:34:00 -0700
>> >> Subject: Co-operator Theory Paper
>> >> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
>> >> Hi Chris, I've done a draft of a uni paper for the Co-operator to
>> >> relate the theory behind it. Once completed this can be one of the
>> >> links on the Co-operator page for people who want to look into it.
Hope you're as happy with this as I am - I reckon it is a really good paper. Just a few comments in the attached. If these are OK with you, you could publish it. I think it will prove to be a hit.
> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:52:14 -0700
> Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> Hi Chris,
> I'm basically happy with the attached draft as it is. I've removed all
> our notes. I shifted a para in the forum section you'll see.
> Alex
> 2009/6/26 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
> > Hi Alex,
> > See comments in the attachment - there are a few suggestions. I think the
> > only substantial thing left to really come to grips with is the idea of the
> > power of the written word in the forum to encourage to group and the
> > individual to really come to an understanding of each other and to find a
> > point of agreement rather than resort to division over points of difference
> > (agreeing to disagree ... this notion is especially patronising and
> > offensive when used by a majority to force a decision and course of action
> > that is disagreeable.)
> > Chris
> >> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> >> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 22:57:38 -0700
> >> Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
> >> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> >> Hi Chris
> >> see attached
> >> Alex
> >> 2009/6/25 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
> >> > Hi Alex,
> >> > I think it is really getting there. I have some further comments in the
> >> > attached.
> >> > Chris
> >> > ________________________________
> >> > From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> >> > Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:58:59 -0700
> >> > Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
> >> > To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> >> > Hi Chris, The attached re-draft has integrated most of your changes
> >> > fully.
> >> > Where it hasn't I have put comments in green.
> >> > Alex
> >> > 2009/6/23 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>
> >> > Hi Alex,
> >> > I've reviewed the paper and shown comments in the attachment.
> >> > Chris
> >> >> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> >> >> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:34:00 -0700
> >> >> Subject: Co-operator Theory Paper
> >> >> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> >> >> Hi Chris, I've done a draft of a uni paper for the Co-operator to
> >> >> relate the theory behind it. Once completed this can be one of the
> >> >> links on the Co-operator page for people who want to look into it.
From: chrisbaul...@hotmail.com
To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: Co-operator Theory Paper
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:33:41 +1000
Hi Alex,
Hope you're as happy with this as I am - I reckon it is a really good paper. Just a few comments in the attached. If these are OK with you, you could publish it. I think it will prove to be a hit.
Chris
> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:52:14 -0700
> Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> Hi Chris,
> I'm basically happy with the attached draft as it is. I've removed all
> our notes. I shifted a para in the forum section you'll see.
> Alex
> 2009/6/26 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
> > Hi Alex,
> > See comments in the attachment - there are a few suggestions. I think the
> > only substantial thing left to really come to grips with is the idea of the
> > power of the written word in the forum to encourage to group and the
> > individual to really come to an understanding of each other and to find a
> > point of agreement rather than resort to division over points of difference
> > (agreeing to disagree ... this notion is especially patronising and
> > offensive when used by a majority to force a decision and course of action
> > that is disagreeable.)
> > Chris
> >> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> >> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 22:57:38 -0700
> >> Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
> >> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> >> Hi Chris
> >> see attached
> >> Alex
> >> 2009/6/25 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
> >> > Hi Alex,
> >> > I think it is really getting there. I have some further comments in the
> >> > attached.
> >> > Chris
> >> > ________________________________
> >> > From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> >> > Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:58:59 -0700
> >> > Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
> >> > To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> >> > Hi Chris, The attached re-draft has integrated most of your changes
> >> > fully.
> >> > Where it hasn't I have put comments in green.
> >> > Alex
> >> > 2009/6/23 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>
> >> > Hi Alex,
> >> > I've reviewed the paper and shown comments in the attachment.
> >> > Chris
> >> >> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> >> >> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:34:00 -0700
> >> >> Subject: Co-operator Theory Paper
> >> >> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> >> >> Hi Chris, I've done a draft of a uni paper for the Co-operator to
> >> >> relate the theory behind it. Once completed this can be one of the
> >> >> links on the Co-operator page for people who want to look into it.
> >> >> Alex
Find your next place with Ninemsn property Looking for a place to rent, share or buy this winter?
_________________________________________________________________
Looking for a new car this winter? Let us help with car news, reviews and more
http://a.ninemsn.com.au/b.aspx?URL=http%3A%2F%2Fsecure%2Dau%2Eimrworl...
> ________________________________
> From: chrisbaul...@hotmail.com
> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> Subject: RE: Co-operator Theory Paper
> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:33:41 +1000
> Hi Alex,
> Hope you're as happy with this as I am - I reckon it is a really good paper.
> Just a few comments in the attached. If these are OK with you, you could
> publish it. I think it will prove to be a hit.
> Chris
>> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
>> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:52:14 -0700
>> Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
>> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
>> Hi Chris,
>> I'm basically happy with the attached draft as it is. I've removed all
>> our notes. I shifted a para in the forum section you'll see.
>> Alex
>> 2009/6/26 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
>> > Hi Alex,
>> > See comments in the attachment - there are a few suggestions. I think
>> > the
>> > only substantial thing left to really come to grips with is the idea of
>> > the
>> > power of the written word in the forum to encourage to group and the
>> > individual to really come to an understanding of each other and to find
>> > a
>> > point of agreement rather than resort to division over points of
>> > difference
>> > (agreeing to disagree ... this notion is especially patronising and
>> > offensive when used by a majority to force a decision and course of
>> > action
>> > that is disagreeable.)
>> > Chris
>> >> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
>> >> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 22:57:38 -0700
>> >> Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
>> >> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
>> >> Hi Chris
>> >> see attached
>> >> Alex
>> >> 2009/6/25 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
>> >> > Hi Alex,
>> >> > I think it is really getting there. I have some further comments in
>> >> > the
>> >> > attached.
>> >> > Chris
>> >> > ________________________________
>> >> > From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
>> >> > Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:58:59 -0700
>> >> > Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
>> >> > To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
>> >> > Hi Chris, The attached re-draft has integrated most of your changes
>> >> > fully.
>> >> > Where it hasn't I have put comments in green.
>> >> > Alex
>> >> > 2009/6/23 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>
>> >> > Hi Alex,
>> >> > I've reviewed the paper and shown comments in the attachment.
>> >> > Chris
>> >> >> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
>> >> >> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:34:00 -0700
>> >> >> Subject: Co-operator Theory Paper
>> >> >> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
>> >> >> Hi Chris, I've done a draft of a uni paper for the Co-operator to
>> >> >> relate the theory behind it. Once completed this can be one of the
>> >> >> links on the Co-operator page for people who want to look into it.
>> >> >> Alex
> ________________________________
> Find your next place with Ninemsn property Looking for a place to rent,
> share or buy this winter?
> ________________________________
> Let us help with car news, reviews and more Looking for a new car this
> winter?
> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:48:29 -0700
> Subject: Re: FW: Co-operator Theory Paper
> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> OK Chris - all changes fine.
> Alex
> 2009/6/29 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
> > sorry forgot the attachment
> > ________________________________
> > From: chrisbaul...@hotmail.com
> > To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> > Subject: RE: Co-operator Theory Paper
> > Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:33:41 +1000
> > Hi Alex,
> > Hope you're as happy with this as I am - I reckon it is a really good paper.
> > Just a few comments in the attached. If these are OK with you, you could
> > publish it. I think it will prove to be a hit.
> > Chris
> >> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> >> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:52:14 -0700
> >> Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
> >> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> >> Hi Chris,
> >> I'm basically happy with the attached draft as it is. I've removed all
> >> our notes. I shifted a para in the forum section you'll see.
> >> Alex
> >> 2009/6/26 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
> >> > Hi Alex,
> >> > See comments in the attachment - there are a few suggestions. I think
> >> > the
> >> > only substantial thing left to really come to grips with is the idea of
> >> > the
> >> > power of the written word in the forum to encourage to group and the
> >> > individual to really come to an understanding of each other and to find
> >> > a
> >> > point of agreement rather than resort to division over points of
> >> > difference
> >> > (agreeing to disagree ... this notion is especially patronising and
> >> > offensive when used by a majority to force a decision and course of
> >> > action
> >> > that is disagreeable.)
> >> > Chris
> >> >> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> >> >> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 22:57:38 -0700
> >> >> Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
> >> >> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> >> >> Hi Chris
> >> >> see attached
> >> >> Alex
> >> >> 2009/6/25 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
> >> >> > Hi Alex,
> >> >> > I think it is really getting there. I have some further comments in
> >> >> > the
> >> >> > attached.
> >> >> > Chris
> >> >> > ________________________________
> >> >> > From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> >> >> > Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:58:59 -0700
> >> >> > Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
> >> >> > To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> >> >> > Hi Chris, The attached re-draft has integrated most of your changes
> >> >> > fully.
> >> >> > Where it hasn't I have put comments in green.
> >> >> > Alex
> >> >> > 2009/6/23 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>
> >> >> > Hi Alex,
> >> >> > I've reviewed the paper and shown comments in the attachment.
> >> >> > Chris
> >> >> >> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> >> >> >> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:34:00 -0700
> >> >> >> Subject: Co-operator Theory Paper
> >> >> >> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> >> >> >> Hi Chris, I've done a draft of a uni paper for the Co-operator to
> >> >> >> relate the theory behind it. Once completed this can be one of the
> >> >> >> links on the Co-operator page for people who want to look into it.
> >> >> >> Alex
> > ________________________________
> > Find your next place with Ninemsn property Looking for a place to rent,
> > share or buy this winter?
> > ________________________________
> > Let us help with car news, reviews and more Looking for a new car this
> > winter?
>> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
>> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:48:29 -0700
>> Subject: Re: FW: Co-operator Theory Paper
>> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
>> OK Chris - all changes fine.
>> Alex
>> 2009/6/29 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
>> > sorry forgot the attachment
>> > ________________________________
>> > From: chrisbaul...@hotmail.com
>> > To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
>> > Subject: RE: Co-operator Theory Paper
>> > Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:33:41 +1000
>> > Hi Alex,
>> > Hope you're as happy with this as I am - I reckon it is a really good
>> > paper.
>> > Just a few comments in the attached. If these are OK with you, you could
>> > publish it. I think it will prove to be a hit.
>> > Chris
>> >> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
>> >> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:52:14 -0700
>> >> Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
>> >> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
>> >> Hi Chris,
>> >> I'm basically happy with the attached draft as it is. I've removed all
>> >> our notes. I shifted a para in the forum section you'll see.
>> >> Alex
>> >> 2009/6/26 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
>> >> > Hi Alex,
>> >> > See comments in the attachment - there are a few suggestions. I think
>> >> > the
>> >> > only substantial thing left to really come to grips with is the idea
>> >> > of
>> >> > the
>> >> > power of the written word in the forum to encourage to group and the
>> >> > individual to really come to an understanding of each other and to
>> >> > find
>> >> > a
>> >> > point of agreement rather than resort to division over points of
>> >> > difference
>> >> > (agreeing to disagree ... this notion is especially patronising and
>> >> > offensive when used by a majority to force a decision and course of
>> >> > action
>> >> > that is disagreeable.)
>> >> > Chris
>> >> >> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
>> >> >> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 22:57:38 -0700
>> >> >> Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
>> >> >> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
>> >> >> Hi Chris
>> >> >> see attached
>> >> >> Alex
>> >> >> 2009/6/25 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
>> >> >> > Hi Alex,
>> >> >> > I think it is really getting there. I have some further comments
>> >> >> > in
>> >> >> > the
>> >> >> > attached.
>> >> >> > Chris
>> >> >> > ________________________________
>> >> >> > From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
>> >> >> > Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:58:59 -0700
>> >> >> > Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
>> >> >> > To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
>> >> >> > Hi Chris, The attached re-draft has integrated most of your
>> >> >> > changes
>> >> >> > fully.
>> >> >> > Where it hasn't I have put comments in green.
>> >> >> > Alex
>> >> >> > 2009/6/23 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>
>> >> >> > Hi Alex,
>> >> >> > I've reviewed the paper and shown comments in the attachment.
>> >> >> > Chris
>> >> >> >> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
>> >> >> >> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:34:00 -0700
>> >> >> >> Subject: Co-operator Theory Paper
>> >> >> >> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
>> >> >> >> Hi Chris, I've done a draft of a uni paper for the Co-operator to
>> >> >> >> relate the theory behind it. Once completed this can be one of
>> >> >> >> the
>> >> >> >> links on the Co-operator page for people who want to look into
>> >> >> >> it.
>> >> >> >> Alex
>> > ________________________________
>> > Find your next place with Ninemsn property Looking for a place to rent,
>> > share or buy this winter?
>> > ________________________________
>> > Let us help with car news, reviews and more Looking for a new car this
>> > winter?
> 2009/7/2 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
> > Great - look forward to seeing it up
> > Chris
> >> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> >> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:48:29 -0700
> >> Subject: Re: FW: Co-operator Theory Paper
> >> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> >> OK Chris - all changes fine.
> >> Alex
> >> 2009/6/29 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
> >> > sorry forgot the attachment
> >> > ________________________________
> >> > From: chrisbaul...@hotmail.com
> >> > To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> >> > Subject: RE: Co-operator Theory Paper
> >> > Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:33:41 +1000
> >> > Hi Alex,
> >> > Hope you're as happy with this as I am - I reckon it is a really good
> >> > paper.
> >> > Just a few comments in the attached. If these are OK with you, you could
> >> > publish it. I think it will prove to be a hit.
> >> > Chris
> >> >> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> >> >> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:52:14 -0700
> >> >> Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
> >> >> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> >> >> Hi Chris,
> >> >> I'm basically happy with the attached draft as it is. I've removed all
> >> >> our notes. I shifted a para in the forum section you'll see.
> >> >> Alex
> >> >> 2009/6/26 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
> >> >> > Hi Alex,
> >> >> > See comments in the attachment - there are a few suggestions. I think
> >> >> > the
> >> >> > only substantial thing left to really come to grips with is the idea
> >> >> > of
> >> >> > the
> >> >> > power of the written word in the forum to encourage to group and the
> >> >> > individual to really come to an understanding of each other and to
> >> >> > find
> >> >> > a
> >> >> > point of agreement rather than resort to division over points of
> >> >> > difference
> >> >> > (agreeing to disagree ... this notion is especially patronising and
> >> >> > offensive when used by a majority to force a decision and course of
> >> >> > action
> >> >> > that is disagreeable.)
> >> >> > Chris
> >> >> >> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> >> >> >> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 22:57:38 -0700
> >> >> >> Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
> >> >> >> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> >> >> >> Hi Chris
> >> >> >> see attached
> >> >> >> Alex
> >> >> >> 2009/6/25 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
> >> >> >> > Hi Alex,
> >> >> >> > I think it is really getting there. I have some further comments
> >> >> >> > in
> >> >> >> > the
> >> >> >> > attached.
> >> >> >> > Chris
> >> >> >> > Hi Chris, The attached re-draft has integrated most of your
> >> >> >> > changes
> >> >> >> > fully.
> >> >> >> > Where it hasn't I have put comments in green.
> >> >> >> > Alex
> >> >> >> > 2009/6/23 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>
> >> >> >> > Hi Alex,
> >> >> >> > I've reviewed the paper and shown comments in the attachment.
> >> >> >> > Chris
> >> >> >> >> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> >> >> >> >> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:34:00 -0700
> >> >> >> >> Subject: Co-operator Theory Paper
> >> >> >> >> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> >> >> >> >> Hi Chris, I've done a draft of a uni paper for the Co-operator to
> >> >> >> >> relate the theory behind it. Once completed this can be one of
> >> >> >> >> the
> >> >> >> >> links on the Co-operator page for people who want to look into
> >> >> >> >> it.
> >> >> >> >> Alex
> >> > ________________________________
> >> > Find your next place with Ninemsn property Looking for a place to rent,
> >> > share or buy this winter?
> >> > ________________________________
> >> > Let us help with car news, reviews and more Looking for a new car this
> >> > winter?
Could you have a look at this page again. It may fit on a modern screen but it doesn't fit on an old one. Could you make the margins larger. There are at least 8 character spaces off the page on every line.
> 2009/7/2 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
> > Great - look forward to seeing it up
> > Chris
> >> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> >> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:48:29 -0700
> >> Subject: Re: FW: Co-operator Theory Paper
> >> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> >> OK Chris - all changes fine.
> >> Alex
> >> 2009/6/29 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
> >> > sorry forgot the attachment
> >> > ________________________________
> >> > From: chrisbaul...@hotmail.com
> >> > To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> >> > Subject: RE: Co-operator Theory Paper
> >> > Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:33:41 +1000
> >> > Hi Alex,
> >> > Hope you're as happy with this as I am - I reckon it is a really good
> >> > paper.
> >> > Just a few comments in the attached. If these are OK with you, you could
> >> > publish it. I think it will prove to be a hit.
> >> > Chris
> >> >> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> >> >> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:52:14 -0700
> >> >> Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
> >> >> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> >> >> Hi Chris,
> >> >> I'm basically happy with the attached draft as it is. I've removed all
> >> >> our notes. I shifted a para in the forum section you'll see.
> >> >> Alex
> >> >> 2009/6/26 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
> >> >> > Hi Alex,
> >> >> > See comments in the attachment - there are a few suggestions. I think
> >> >> > the
> >> >> > only substantial thing left to really come to grips with is the idea
> >> >> > of
> >> >> > the
> >> >> > power of the written word in the forum to encourage to group and the
> >> >> > individual to really come to an understanding of each other and to
> >> >> > find
> >> >> > a
> >> >> > point of agreement rather than resort to division over points of
> >> >> > difference
> >> >> > (agreeing to disagree ... this notion is especially patronising and
> >> >> > offensive when used by a majority to force a decision and course of
> >> >> > action
> >> >> > that is disagreeable.)
> >> >> > Chris
> >> >> >> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> >> >> >> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 22:57:38 -0700
> >> >> >> Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
> >> >> >> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> >> >> >> Hi Chris
> >> >> >> see attached
> >> >> >> Alex
> >> >> >> 2009/6/25 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
> >> >> >> > Hi Alex,
> >> >> >> > I think it is really getting there. I have some further comments
> >> >> >> > in
> >> >> >> > the
> >> >> >> > attached.
> >> >> >> > Chris
> >> >> >> > Hi Chris, The attached re-draft has integrated most of your
> >> >> >> > changes
> >> >> >> > fully.
> >> >> >> > Where it hasn't I have put comments in green.
> >> >> >> > Alex
> >> >> >> > 2009/6/23 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>
> >> >> >> > Hi Alex,
> >> >> >> > I've reviewed the paper and shown comments in the attachment.
> >> >> >> > Chris
> >> >> >> >> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> >> >> >> >> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:34:00 -0700
> >> >> >> >> Subject: Co-operator Theory Paper
> >> >> >> >> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> >> >> >> >> Hi Chris, I've done a draft of a uni paper for the Co-operator to
> >> >> >> >> relate the theory behind it. Once completed this can be one of
> >> >> >> >> the
> >> >> >> >> links on the Co-operator page for people who want to look into
> >> >> >> >> it.
> >> >> >> >> Alex
> >> > ________________________________
> >> > Find your next place with Ninemsn property Looking for a place to rent,
> >> > share or buy this winter?
> >> > ________________________________
> >> > Let us help with car news, reviews and more Looking for a new car this
> >> > winter?
> Hi Alex,
> Could you have a look at this page again. It may fit on a modern screen but
> it doesn't fit on an old one. Could you make the margins larger. There are
> at least 8 character spaces off the page on every line.
> Chris
>> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
>> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 23:13:00 -0700
>> Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
>> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
>> 2009/7/2 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
>> > Great - look forward to seeing it up
>> > Chris
>> >> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
>> >> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:48:29 -0700
>> >> Subject: Re: FW: Co-operator Theory Paper
>> >> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
>> >> OK Chris - all changes fine.
>> >> Alex
>> >> 2009/6/29 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
>> >> > sorry forgot the attachment
>> >> > ________________________________
>> >> > From: chrisbaul...@hotmail.com
>> >> > To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
>> >> > Subject: RE: Co-operator Theory Paper
>> >> > Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:33:41 +1000
>> >> > Hi Alex,
>> >> > Hope you're as happy with this as I am - I reckon it is a really good
>> >> > paper.
>> >> > Just a few comments in the attached. If these are OK with you, you
>> >> > could
>> >> > publish it. I think it will prove to be a hit.
>> >> > Chris
>> >> >> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
>> >> >> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:52:14 -0700
>> >> >> Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
>> >> >> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
>> >> >> Hi Chris,
>> >> >> I'm basically happy with the attached draft as it is. I've removed
>> >> >> all
>> >> >> our notes. I shifted a para in the forum section you'll see.
>> >> >> Alex
>> >> >> 2009/6/26 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
>> >> >> > Hi Alex,
>> >> >> > See comments in the attachment - there are a few suggestions. I
>> >> >> > think
>> >> >> > the
>> >> >> > only substantial thing left to really come to grips with is the
>> >> >> > idea
>> >> >> > of
>> >> >> > the
>> >> >> > power of the written word in the forum to encourage to group and
>> >> >> > the
>> >> >> > individual to really come to an understanding of each other and to
>> >> >> > find
>> >> >> > a
>> >> >> > point of agreement rather than resort to division over points of
>> >> >> > difference
>> >> >> > (agreeing to disagree ... this notion is especially patronising
>> >> >> > and
>> >> >> > offensive when used by a majority to force a decision and course
>> >> >> > of
>> >> >> > action
>> >> >> > that is disagreeable.)
>> >> >> > Chris
>> >> >> >> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
>> >> >> >> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 22:57:38 -0700
>> >> >> >> Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
>> >> >> >> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
>> >> >> >> Hi Chris
>> >> >> >> see attached
>> >> >> >> Alex
>> >> >> >> 2009/6/25 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
>> >> >> >> > Hi Alex,
>> >> >> >> > I think it is really getting there. I have some further
>> >> >> >> > comments
>> >> >> >> > in
>> >> >> >> > the
>> >> >> >> > attached.
>> >> >> >> > Chris
>> >> >> >> > Hi Chris, The attached re-draft has integrated most of your
>> >> >> >> > changes
>> >> >> >> > fully.
>> >> >> >> > Where it hasn't I have put comments in green.
>> >> >> >> > Alex
>> >> >> >> > 2009/6/23 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>
>> >> >> >> > Hi Alex,
>> >> >> >> > I've reviewed the paper and shown comments in the attachment.
>> >> >> >> > Chris
>> >> >> >> >> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
>> >> >> >> >> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:34:00 -0700
>> >> >> >> >> Subject: Co-operator Theory Paper
>> >> >> >> >> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
>> >> >> >> >> Hi Chris, I've done a draft of a uni paper for the Co-operator
>> >> >> >> >> to
>> >> >> >> >> relate the theory behind it. Once completed this can be one of
>> >> >> >> >> the
>> >> >> >> >> links on the Co-operator page for people who want to look into
>> >> >> >> >> it.
>> >> >> >> >> Alex
>> >> > ________________________________
>> >> > Find your next place with Ninemsn property Looking for a place to
>> >> > rent,
>> >> > share or buy this winter?
>> >> > ________________________________
>> >> > Let us help with car news, reviews and more Looking for a new car
>> >> > this
>> >> > winter?
> 2009/7/20 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
>> Hi Alex,
>> Could you have a look at this page again. It may fit on a modern screen but
>> it doesn't fit on an old one. Could you make the margins larger. There are
>> at least 8 character spaces off the page on every line.
>> Chris
>>> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
>>> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 23:13:00 -0700
>>> Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
>>> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
>>> 2009/7/2 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
>>> > Great - look forward to seeing it up
>>> > Chris
>>> >> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
>>> >> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:48:29 -0700
>>> >> Subject: Re: FW: Co-operator Theory Paper
>>> >> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
>>> >> OK Chris - all changes fine.
>>> >> Alex
>>> >> 2009/6/29 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
>>> >> > sorry forgot the attachment
>>> >> > ________________________________
>>> >> > From: chrisbaul...@hotmail.com
>>> >> > To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
>>> >> > Subject: RE: Co-operator Theory Paper
>>> >> > Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:33:41 +1000
>>> >> > Hi Alex,
>>> >> > Hope you're as happy with this as I am - I reckon it is a really good
>>> >> > paper.
>>> >> > Just a few comments in the attached. If these are OK with you, you
>>> >> > could
>>> >> > publish it. I think it will prove to be a hit.
>>> >> > Chris
>>> >> >> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
>>> >> >> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:52:14 -0700
>>> >> >> Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
>>> >> >> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
>>> >> >> Hi Chris,
>>> >> >> I'm basically happy with the attached draft as it is. I've removed
>>> >> >> all
>>> >> >> our notes. I shifted a para in the forum section you'll see.
>>> >> >> Alex
>>> >> >> 2009/6/26 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
>>> >> >> > Hi Alex,
>>> >> >> > See comments in the attachment - there are a few suggestions. I
>>> >> >> > think
>>> >> >> > the
>>> >> >> > only substantial thing left to really come to grips with is the
>>> >> >> > idea
>>> >> >> > of
>>> >> >> > the
>>> >> >> > power of the written word in the forum to encourage to group and
>>> >> >> > the
>>> >> >> > individual to really come to an understanding of each other and to
>>> >> >> > find
>>> >> >> > a
>>> >> >> > point of agreement rather than resort to division over points of
>>> >> >> > difference
>>> >> >> > (agreeing to disagree ... this notion is especially patronising
>>> >> >> > and
>>> >> >> > offensive when used by a majority to force a decision and course
>>> >> >> > of
>>> >> >> > action
>>> >> >> > that is disagreeable.)
>>> >> >> > Chris
>>> >> >> >> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
>>> >> >> >> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 22:57:38 -0700
>>> >> >> >> Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
>>> >> >> >> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
>>> >> >> >> Hi Chris
>>> >> >> >> see attached
>>> >> >> >> Alex
>>> >> >> >> 2009/6/25 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
>>> >> >> >> > Hi Alex,
>>> >> >> >> > I think it is really getting there. I have some further
>>> >> >> >> > comments
>>> >> >> >> > in
>>> >> >> >> > the
>>> >> >> >> > attached.
>>> >> >> >> > Chris
>>> >> >> >> > Hi Chris, The attached re-draft has integrated most of your
>>> >> >> >> > changes
>>> >> >> >> > fully.
>>> >> >> >> > Where it hasn't I have put comments in green.
>>> >> >> >> > Alex
>>> >> >> >> > 2009/6/23 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>
>>> >> >> >> > Hi Alex,
>>> >> >> >> > I've reviewed the paper and shown comments in the attachment.
>>> >> >> >> > Chris
>>> >> >> >> >> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
>>> >> >> >> >> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:34:00 -0700
>>> >> >> >> >> Subject: Co-operator Theory Paper
>>> >> >> >> >> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
>>> >> >> >> >> Hi Chris, I've done a draft of a uni paper for the Co-operator
>>> >> >> >> >> to
>>> >> >> >> >> relate the theory behind it. Once completed this can be one of
>>> >> >> >> >> the
>>> >> >> >> >> links on the Co-operator page for people who want to look into
>>> >> >> >> >> it.
>>> >> >> >> >> Alex
>>> >> > ________________________________
>>> >> > Find your next place with Ninemsn property Looking for a place to
>>> >> > rent,
>>> >> > share or buy this winter?
>>> >> > ________________________________
>>> >> > Let us help with car news, reviews and more Looking for a new car
>>> >> > this
>>> >> > winter?
The wording fits now although it would be easier to read if it was bigger font.
Unfortunately there is now something wrong with fig 2.
When you get a chance could you have a look - and it might be best to quickly review the whole publication when you make changes - as you know, changing one thing can effect something else.
> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 06:59:46 -0700
> Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> I think this is fixed now - have a look.
> Alex
> 2009/7/21 Alex Baumann <akme.baum...@gmail.com>:
> > OK - I'll get a chance soon
> > alex
> > 2009/7/20 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
> >> Hi Alex,
> >> Could you have a look at this page again. It may fit on a modern screen but
> >> it doesn't fit on an old one. Could you make the margins larger. There are
> >> at least 8 character spaces off the page on every line.
> >> Chris
> >>> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> >>> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 23:13:00 -0700
> >>> Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
> >>> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> >>> 2009/7/2 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
> >>> > Great - look forward to seeing it up
> >>> > Chris
> >>> >> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> >>> >> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:48:29 -0700
> >>> >> Subject: Re: FW: Co-operator Theory Paper
> >>> >> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> >>> >> OK Chris - all changes fine.
> >>> >> Alex
> >>> >> 2009/6/29 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
> >>> >> > sorry forgot the attachment
> >>> >> > ________________________________
> >>> >> > From: chrisbaul...@hotmail.com
> >>> >> > To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> >>> >> > Subject: RE: Co-operator Theory Paper
> >>> >> > Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:33:41 +1000
> >>> >> > Hi Alex,
> >>> >> > Hope you're as happy with this as I am - I reckon it is a really good
> >>> >> > paper.
> >>> >> > Just a few comments in the attached. If these are OK with you, you
> >>> >> > could
> >>> >> > publish it. I think it will prove to be a hit.
> >>> >> > Chris
> >>> >> >> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> >>> >> >> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:52:14 -0700
> >>> >> >> Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
> >>> >> >> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> >>> >> >> Hi Chris,
> >>> >> >> I'm basically happy with the attached draft as it is. I've removed
> >>> >> >> all
> >>> >> >> our notes. I shifted a para in the forum section you'll see.
> >>> >> >> Alex
> >>> >> >> 2009/6/26 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
> >>> >> >> > Hi Alex,
> >>> >> >> > See comments in the attachment - there are a few suggestions. I
> >>> >> >> > think
> >>> >> >> > the
> >>> >> >> > only substantial thing left to really come to grips with is the
> >>> >> >> > idea
> >>> >> >> > of
> >>> >> >> > the
> >>> >> >> > power of the written word in the forum to encourage to group and
> >>> >> >> > the
> >>> >> >> > individual to really come to an understanding of each other and to
> >>> >> >> > find
> >>> >> >> > a
> >>> >> >> > point of agreement rather than resort to division over points of
> >>> >> >> > difference
> >>> >> >> > (agreeing to disagree ... this notion is especially patronising
> >>> >> >> > and
> >>> >> >> > offensive when used by a majority to force a decision and course
> >>> >> >> > of
> >>> >> >> > action
> >>> >> >> > that is disagreeable.)
> >>> >> >> > Chris
> >>> >> >> >> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> >>> >> >> >> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 22:57:38 -0700
> >>> >> >> >> Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
> >>> >> >> >> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> >>> >> >> >> Hi Chris
> >>> >> >> >> see attached
> >>> >> >> >> Alex
> >>> >> >> >> 2009/6/25 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
> >>> >> >> >> > Hi Alex,
> >>> >> >> >> > I think it is really getting there. I have some further
> >>> >> >> >> > comments
> >>> >> >> >> > in
> >>> >> >> >> > the
> >>> >> >> >> > attached.
> >>> >> >> >> > Chris
> >>> >> >> >> > Hi Chris, The attached re-draft has integrated most of your
> >>> >> >> >> > changes
> >>> >> >> >> > fully.
> >>> >> >> >> > Where it hasn't I have put comments in green.
> >>> >> >> >> > Alex
> >>> >> >> >> > 2009/6/23 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>
> >>> >> >> >> > Hi Alex,
> >>> >> >> >> > I've reviewed the paper and shown comments in the attachment.
> >>> >> >> >> > Chris
> >>> >> >> >> >> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> >>> >> >> >> >> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:34:00 -0700
> >>> >> >> >> >> Subject: Co-operator Theory Paper
> >>> >> >> >> >> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> >>> >> >> >> >> Hi Chris, I've done a draft of a uni paper for the Co-operator
> >>> >> >> >> >> to
> >>> >> >> >> >> relate the theory behind it. Once completed this can be one of
> >>> >> >> >> >> the
> >>> >> >> >> >> links on the Co-operator page for people who want to look into
> >>> >> >> >> >> it.
> >>> >> >> >> >> Alex
> >>> >> > ________________________________
> >>> >> > Find your next place with Ninemsn property Looking for a place to
> >>> >> > rent,
> >>> >> > share or buy this winter?
> >>> >> > ________________________________
> >>> >> > Let us help with car news, reviews and more Looking for a new car
> >>> >> > this
> >>> >> > winter?
> Hi Alex,
> The wording fits now although it would be easier to read if it was
> bigger font.
> Unfortunately there is now something wrong with fig 2.
> When you get a chance could you have a look - and it might be best
> to quickly review the whole publication when you make changes - as
> you know, changing one thing can effect something else.
> Chris
> > From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> > Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 06:59:46 -0700
> > Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
> > To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> > I think this is fixed now - have a look.
> > Alex
> > 2009/7/21 Alex Baumann <akme.baum...@gmail.com>:
> > > OK - I'll get a chance soon
> > > alex
> > > 2009/7/20 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
> > >> Hi Alex,
> > >> Could you have a look at this page again. It may fit on a
> modern screen but
> > >> it doesn't fit on an old one. Could you make the margins
> larger. There are
> > >> at least 8 character spaces off the page on every line.
> > >> Chris
> > >>> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> > >>> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 23:13:00 -0700
> > >>> Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
> > >>> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> > >>> >> > Hi Alex,
> > >>> >> > Hope you're as happy with this as I am - I reckon it is a
> really good
> > >>> >> > paper.
> > >>> >> > Just a few comments in the attached. If these are OK with
> you, you
> > >>> >> > could
> > >>> >> > publish it. I think it will prove to be a hit.
> > >>> >> > Chris
> > >>> >> >> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> > >>> >> >> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:52:14 -0700
> > >>> >> >> Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
> > >>> >> >> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> > >>> >> >> Hi Chris,
> > >>> >> >> I'm basically happy with the attached draft as it is.
> I've removed
> > >>> >> >> all
> > >>> >> >> our notes. I shifted a para in the forum section you'll
> see.
> > >>> >> >> Alex
> > >>> >> >> 2009/6/26 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
> > >>> >> >> > Hi Alex,
> > >>> >> >> > See comments in the attachment - there are a few
> suggestions. I
> > >>> >> >> > think
> > >>> >> >> > the
> > >>> >> >> > only substantial thing left to really come to grips
> with is the
> > >>> >> >> > idea
> > >>> >> >> > of
> > >>> >> >> > the
> > >>> >> >> > power of the written word in the forum to encourage to
> group and
> > >>> >> >> > the
> > >>> >> >> > individual to really come to an understanding of each
> other and to
> > >>> >> >> > find
> > >>> >> >> > a
> > >>> >> >> > point of agreement rather than resort to division over
> points of
> > >>> >> >> > difference
> > >>> >> >> > (agreeing to disagree ... this notion is especially
> patronising
> > >>> >> >> > and
> > >>> >> >> > offensive when used by a majority to force a decision
> and course
> > >>> >> >> > of
> > >>> >> >> > action
> > >>> >> >> > that is disagreeable.)
> > >>> >> >> > Chris
> > >>> >> >> >> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> > >>> >> >> >> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 22:57:38 -0700
> > >>> >> >> >> Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
> > >>> >> >> >> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> > >>> >> >> >> Hi Chris
> > >>> >> >> >> see attached
> > >>> >> >> >> Alex
> > >>> >> >> >> 2009/6/25 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
> > >>> >> >> >> > Hi Alex,
> > >>> >> >> >> > I think it is really getting there. I have some
> further
> > >>> >> >> >> > comments
> > >>> >> >> >> > in
> > >>> >> >> >> > the
> > >>> >> >> >> > attached.
> > >>> >> >> >> > Chris
> > >>> >> >> >> > Hi Chris, The attached re-draft has integrated most
> of your
> > >>> >> >> >> > changes
> > >>> >> >> >> > fully.
> > >>> >> >> >> > Where it hasn't I have put comments in green.
> > >>> >> >> >> > Alex
> > >>> >> >> >> > 2009/6/23 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>
> > >>> >> >> >> > Hi Alex,
> > >>> >> >> >> > I've reviewed the paper and shown comments in the
> attachment.
> > >>> >> >> >> > Chris
> > >>> >> >> >> >> Hi Chris, I've done a draft of a uni paper for the
> Co-operator
> > >>> >> >> >> >> to
> > >>> >> >> >> >> relate the theory behind it. Once completed this
> can be one of
> > >>> >> >> >> >> the
> > >>> >> >> >> >> links on the Co-operator page for people who want
> to look into
> > >>> >> >> >> >> it.
> > >>> >> >> >> >> Alex
> > >>> >> > ________________________________
> > >>> >> > Find your next place with Ninemsn property Looking for a
> place to
> > >>> >> > rent,
> > >>> >> > share or buy this winter?
> > >>> >> > ________________________________
> > >>> >> > Let us help with car news, reviews and more Looking for a
> new car
> > >>> >> > this
> > >>> >> > winter?
----------------------------------------------------------
Damian M Cooper
Manager - Mountains Youth Services Team
Blue Mountains - NSW
M : 0413 099 947
www.myst.com.au
Sorry Damian - I'll look into it, solve it and get back to you.
Chris
From: mana...@myst.com.au
To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 12:23:36 +1000
Dear Alex and Chris
I dont know how or why put I keep getting your emails and I am not a member of your group.
Any ideas how we can stop this ?
regards,
Damian
On 28/07/2009, at 12:16 PM, Chris Baulman wrote:
Hi Alex,
The wording fits now although it would be easier to read if it was bigger font.
Unfortunately there is now something wrong with fig 2.
When you get a chance could you have a look - and it might be best to quickly review the whole publication when you make changes - as you know, changing one thing can effect something else.
> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 06:59:46 -0700
> Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> I think this is fixed now - have a look.
> Alex
> 2009/7/21 Alex Baumann <akme.baum...@gmail.com>:
> > OK - I'll get a chance soon
> > alex
> > 2009/7/20 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
> >> Hi Alex,
> >> Could you have a look at this page again. It may fit on a modern screen but
> >> it doesn't fit on an old one. Could you make the margins larger. There are
> >> at least 8 character spaces off the page on every line.
> >> Chris
> >>> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> >>> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 23:13:00 -0700
> >>> Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
> >>> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> >>> 2009/7/2 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
> >>> > Great - look forward to seeing it up
> >>> > Chris
> >>> >> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> >>> >> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:48:29 -0700
> >>> >> Subject: Re: FW: Co-operator Theory Paper
> >>> >> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> >>> >> OK Chris - all changes fine.
> >>> >> Alex
> >>> >> 2009/6/29 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
> >>> >> > sorry forgot the attachment
> >>> >> > ________________________________
> >>> >> > From: chrisbaul...@hotmail.com
> >>> >> > To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> >>> >> > Subject: RE: Co-operator Theory Paper
> >>> >> > Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:33:41 +1000
> >>> >> > Hi Alex,
> >>> >> > Hope you're as happy with this as I am - I reckon it is a really good
> >>> >> > paper.
> >>> >> > Just a few comments in the attached. If these are OK with you, you
> >>> >> > could
> >>> >> > publish it. I think it will prove to be a hit.
> >>> >> > Chris
> >>> >> >> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> >>> >> >> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:52:14 -0700
> >>> >> >> Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
> >>> >> >> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> >>> >> >> Hi Chris,
> >>> >> >> I'm basically happy with the attached draft as it is. I've removed
> >>> >> >> all
> >>> >> >> our notes. I shifted a para in the forum section you'll see.
> >>> >> >> Alex
> >>> >> >> 2009/6/26 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
> >>> >> >> > Hi Alex,
> >>> >> >> > See comments in the attachment - there are a few suggestions. I
> >>> >> >> > think
> >>> >> >> > the
> >>> >> >> > only substantial thing left to really come to grips with is the
> >>> >> >> > idea
> >>> >> >> > of
> >>> >> >> > the
> >>> >> >> > power of the written word in the forum to encourage to group and
> >>> >> >> > the
> >>> >> >> > individual to really come to an understanding of each other and to
> >>> >> >> > find
> >>> >> >> > a
> >>> >> >> > point of agreement rather than resort to division over points of
> >>> >> >> > difference
> >>> >> >> > (agreeing to disagree ... this notion is especially patronising
> >>> >> >> > and
> >>> >> >> > offensive when used by a majority to force a decision and course
> >>> >> >> > of
> >>> >> >> > action
> >>> >> >> > that is disagreeable.)
> >>> >> >> > Chris
> >>> >> >> >> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> >>> >> >> >> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 22:57:38 -0700
> >>> >> >> >> Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
> >>> >> >> >> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> >>> >> >> >> Hi Chris
> >>> >> >> >> see attached
> >>> >> >> >> Alex
> >>> >> >> >> 2009/6/25 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
> >>> >> >> >> > Hi Alex,
> >>> >> >> >> > I think it is really getting there. I have some further
> >>> >> >> >> > comments
> >>> >> >> >> > in
> >>> >> >> >> > the
> >>> >> >> >> > attached.
> >>> >> >> >> > Chris
> >>> >> >> >> > Hi Chris, The attached re-draft has integrated most of your
> >>> >> >> >> > changes
> >>> >> >> >> > fully.
> >>> >> >> >> > Where it hasn't I have put comments in green.
> >>> >> >> >> > Alex
> >>> >> >> >> > 2009/6/23 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>
> >>> >> >> >> > Hi Alex,
> >>> >> >> >> > I've reviewed the paper and shown comments in the attachment.
> >>> >> >> >> > Chris
> >>> >> >> >> >> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> >>> >> >> >> >> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:34:00 -0700
> >>> >> >> >> >> Subject: Co-operator Theory Paper
> >>> >> >> >> >> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> >>> >> >> >> >> Hi Chris, I've done a draft of a uni paper for the Co-operator
> >>> >> >> >> >> to
> >>> >> >> >> >> relate the theory behind it. Once completed this can be one of
> >>> >> >> >> >> the
> >>> >> >> >> >> links on the Co-operator page for people who want to look into
> >>> >> >> >> >> it.
> >>> >> >> >> >> Alex
> >>> >> > ________________________________
> >>> >> > Find your next place with Ninemsn property Looking for a place to
> >>> >> > rent,
> >>> >> > share or buy this winter?
> >>> >> > ________________________________
> >>> >> > Let us help with car news, reviews and more Looking for a new car
> >>> >> > this
> >>> >> > winter?
----------------------------------------------------------
Damian M Cooper Manager - Mountains Youth Services Team
Blue Mountains - NSW
M : 0413 099 947
www.myst.com.au
I have found a connection to 'myst' with 'Willem' who subscribed in 2008. Do you want to check this and let me know what you want done?
Chris
From: mana...@myst.com.au
To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 12:23:36 +1000
Dear Alex and Chris
I dont know how or why put I keep getting your emails and I am not a member of your group.
Any ideas how we can stop this ?
regards,
Damian
On 28/07/2009, at 12:16 PM, Chris Baulman wrote:
Hi Alex,
The wording fits now although it would be easier to read if it was bigger font.
Unfortunately there is now something wrong with fig 2.
When you get a chance could you have a look - and it might be best to quickly review the whole publication when you make changes - as you know, changing one thing can effect something else.
> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 06:59:46 -0700
> Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> I think this is fixed now - have a look.
> Alex
> 2009/7/21 Alex Baumann <akme.baum...@gmail.com>:
> > OK - I'll get a chance soon
> > alex
> > 2009/7/20 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
> >> Hi Alex,
> >> Could you have a look at this page again. It may fit on a modern screen but
> >> it doesn't fit on an old one. Could you make the margins larger. There are
> >> at least 8 character spaces off the page on every line.
> >> Chris
> >>> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> >>> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 23:13:00 -0700
> >>> Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
> >>> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> >>> 2009/7/2 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
> >>> > Great - look forward to seeing it up
> >>> > Chris
> >>> >> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> >>> >> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:48:29 -0700
> >>> >> Subject: Re: FW: Co-operator Theory Paper
> >>> >> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> >>> >> OK Chris - all changes fine.
> >>> >> Alex
> >>> >> 2009/6/29 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
> >>> >> > sorry forgot the attachment
> >>> >> > ________________________________
> >>> >> > From: chrisbaul...@hotmail.com
> >>> >> > To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> >>> >> > Subject: RE: Co-operator Theory Paper
> >>> >> > Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:33:41 +1000
> >>> >> > Hi Alex,
> >>> >> > Hope you're as happy with this as I am - I reckon it is a really good
> >>> >> > paper.
> >>> >> > Just a few comments in the attached. If these are OK with you, you
> >>> >> > could
> >>> >> > publish it. I think it will prove to be a hit.
> >>> >> > Chris
> >>> >> >> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> >>> >> >> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:52:14 -0700
> >>> >> >> Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
> >>> >> >> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> >>> >> >> Hi Chris,
> >>> >> >> I'm basically happy with the attached draft as it is. I've removed
> >>> >> >> all
> >>> >> >> our notes. I shifted a para in the forum section you'll see.
> >>> >> >> Alex
> >>> >> >> 2009/6/26 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
> >>> >> >> > Hi Alex,
> >>> >> >> > See comments in the attachment - there are a few suggestions. I
> >>> >> >> > think
> >>> >> >> > the
> >>> >> >> > only substantial thing left to really come to grips with is the
> >>> >> >> > idea
> >>> >> >> > of
> >>> >> >> > the
> >>> >> >> > power of the written word in the forum to encourage to group and
> >>> >> >> > the
> >>> >> >> > individual to really come to an understanding of each other and to
> >>> >> >> > find
> >>> >> >> > a
> >>> >> >> > point of agreement rather than resort to division over points of
> >>> >> >> > difference
> >>> >> >> > (agreeing to disagree ... this notion is especially patronising
> >>> >> >> > and
> >>> >> >> > offensive when used by a majority to force a decision and course
> >>> >> >> > of
> >>> >> >> > action
> >>> >> >> > that is disagreeable.)
> >>> >> >> > Chris
> >>> >> >> >> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> >>> >> >> >> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 22:57:38 -0700
> >>> >> >> >> Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
> >>> >> >> >> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> >>> >> >> >> Hi Chris
> >>> >> >> >> see attached
> >>> >> >> >> Alex
> >>> >> >> >> 2009/6/25 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
> >>> >> >> >> > Hi Alex,
> >>> >> >> >> > I think it is really getting there. I have some further
> >>> >> >> >> > comments
> >>> >> >> >> > in
> >>> >> >> >> > the
> >>> >> >> >> > attached.
> >>> >> >> >> > Chris
> >>> >> >> >> > Hi Chris, The attached re-draft has integrated most of your
> >>> >> >> >> > changes
> >>> >> >> >> > fully.
> >>> >> >> >> > Where it hasn't I have put comments in green.
> >>> >> >> >> > Alex
> >>> >> >> >> > 2009/6/23 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>
> >>> >> >> >> > Hi Alex,
> >>> >> >> >> > I've reviewed the paper and shown comments in the attachment.
> >>> >> >> >> > Chris
> >>> >> >> >> >> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> >>> >> >> >> >> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:34:00 -0700
> >>> >> >> >> >> Subject: Co-operator Theory Paper
> >>> >> >> >> >> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> >>> >> >> >> >> Hi Chris, I've done a draft of a uni paper for the Co-operator
> >>> >> >> >> >> to
> >>> >> >> >> >> relate the theory behind it. Once completed this can be one of
> >>> >> >> >> >> the
> >>> >> >> >> >> links on the Co-operator page for people who want to look into
> >>> >> >> >> >> it.
> >>> >> >> >> >> Alex
> >>> >> > ________________________________
> >>> >> > Find your next place with Ninemsn property Looking for a place to
> >>> >> > rent,
> >>> >> > share or buy this winter?
> >>> >> > ________________________________
> >>> >> > Let us help with car news, reviews and more Looking for a new car
> >>> >> > this
> >>> >> > winter?
----------------------------------------------------------
Damian M Cooper Manager - Mountains Youth Services Team
Blue Mountains - NSW
M : 0413 099 947
www.myst.com.au
_________________________________________________________________
What goes online, stays online Check the daily blob for the latest on what's happening around the web
http://windowslive.ninemsn.com.au/blog.aspx
> Hi Alex,
> The wording fits now although it would be easier to read if it was bigger
> font.
> Unfortunately there is now something wrong with fig 2.
> When you get a chance could you have a look - and it might be best to
> quickly review the whole publication when you make changes - as you know,
> changing one thing can effect something else.
> Chris
>> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
>> Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 06:59:46 -0700
>> Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
>> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
>> I think this is fixed now - have a look.
>> Alex
>> 2009/7/21 Alex Baumann <akme.baum...@gmail.com>:
>> > OK - I'll get a chance soon
>> > alex
>> > 2009/7/20 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
>> >> Hi Alex,
>> >> Could you have a look at this page again. It may fit on a modern screen
>> >> but
>> >> it doesn't fit on an old one. Could you make the margins larger. There
>> >> are
>> >> at least 8 character spaces off the page on every line.
>> >> Chris
>> >>> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
>> >>> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 23:13:00 -0700
>> >>> Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
>> >>> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
>> >>> 2009/7/2 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
>> >>> > Great - look forward to seeing it up
>> >>> > Chris
>> >>> >> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
>> >>> >> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:48:29 -0700
>> >>> >> Subject: Re: FW: Co-operator Theory Paper
>> >>> >> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
>> >>> >> OK Chris - all changes fine.
>> >>> >> Alex
>> >>> >> 2009/6/29 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
>> >>> >> > sorry forgot the attachment
>> >>> >> > ________________________________
>> >>> >> > From: chrisbaul...@hotmail.com
>> >>> >> > To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
>> >>> >> > Subject: RE: Co-operator Theory Paper
>> >>> >> > Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:33:41 +1000
>> >>> >> > Hi Alex,
>> >>> >> > Hope you're as happy with this as I am - I reckon it is a really
>> >>> >> > good
>> >>> >> > paper.
>> >>> >> > Just a few comments in the attached. If these are OK with you,
>> >>> >> > you
>> >>> >> > could
>> >>> >> > publish it. I think it will prove to be a hit.
>> >>> >> > Chris
>> >>> >> >> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
>> >>> >> >> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:52:14 -0700
>> >>> >> >> Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
>> >>> >> >> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
>> >>> >> >> Hi Chris,
>> >>> >> >> I'm basically happy with the attached draft as it is. I've
>> >>> >> >> removed
>> >>> >> >> all
>> >>> >> >> our notes. I shifted a para in the forum section you'll see.
>> >>> >> >> Alex
>> >>> >> >> 2009/6/26 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
>> >>> >> >> > Hi Alex,
>> >>> >> >> > See comments in the attachment - there are a few suggestions.
>> >>> >> >> > I
>> >>> >> >> > think
>> >>> >> >> > the
>> >>> >> >> > only substantial thing left to really come to grips with is
>> >>> >> >> > the
>> >>> >> >> > idea
>> >>> >> >> > of
>> >>> >> >> > the
>> >>> >> >> > power of the written word in the forum to encourage to group
>> >>> >> >> > and
>> >>> >> >> > the
>> >>> >> >> > individual to really come to an understanding of each other
>> >>> >> >> > and to
>> >>> >> >> > find
>> >>> >> >> > a
>> >>> >> >> > point of agreement rather than resort to division over points
>> >>> >> >> > of
>> >>> >> >> > difference
>> >>> >> >> > (agreeing to disagree ... this notion is
>> >>> >> >> > especially patronising
>> >>> >> >> > and
>> >>> >> >> > offensive when used by a majority to force a decision and
>> >>> >> >> > course
>> >>> >> >> > of
>> >>> >> >> > action
>> >>> >> >> > that is disagreeable.)
>> >>> >> >> > Chris
>> >>> >> >> >> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
>> >>> >> >> >> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 22:57:38 -0700
>> >>> >> >> >> Subject: Re: Co-operator Theory Paper
>> >>> >> >> >> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
>> >>> >> >> >> Hi Chris
>> >>> >> >> >> see attached
>> >>> >> >> >> Alex
>> >>> >> >> >> 2009/6/25 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
>> >>> >> >> >> > Hi Alex,
>> >>> >> >> >> > I think it is really getting there. I have some further
>> >>> >> >> >> > comments
>> >>> >> >> >> > in
>> >>> >> >> >> > the
>> >>> >> >> >> > attached.
>> >>> >> >> >> > Chris
>> >>> >> >> >> > Hi Chris, The attached re-draft has integrated most of your
>> >>> >> >> >> > changes
>> >>> >> >> >> > fully.
>> >>> >> >> >> > Where it hasn't I have put comments in green.
>> >>> >> >> >> > Alex
>> >>> >> >> >> > 2009/6/23 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>
>> >>> >> >> >> > Hi Alex,
>> >>> >> >> >> > I've reviewed the paper and shown comments in the
>> >>> >> >> >> > attachment.
>> >>> >> >> >> > Chris
>> >>> >> >> >> >> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
>> >>> >> >> >> >> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:34:00 -0700
>> >>> >> >> >> >> Subject: Co-operator Theory Paper
>> >>> >> >> >> >> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
>> >>> >> >> >> >> Hi Chris, I've done a draft of a uni paper for the
>> >>> >> >> >> >> Co-operator
>> >>> >> >> >> >> to
>> >>> >> >> >> >> relate the theory behind it. Once completed this can be
>> >>> >> >> >> >> one of
>> >>> >> >> >> >> the
>> >>> >> >> >> >> links on the Co-operator page for people who want to look
>> >>> >> >> >> >> into
>> >>> >> >> >> >> it.
>> >>> >> >> >> >> Alex
>> >>> >> > ________________________________
>> >>> >> > Find your next place with Ninemsn property Looking for a place to
>> >>> >> > rent,
>> >>> >> > share or buy this winter?
>> >>> >> > ________________________________
>> >>> >> > Let us help with car news, reviews and more Looking for a new car
>> >>> >> > this
>> >>> >> > winter?
|
