> From: akme.baum
...@gmail.com
> Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 21:26:48 -0700
> Subject: Re: new page for NTW
> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> OK see the annual gardens page now
> alex
> 2009/8/23 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
> > Ok - a hyprelink at the top would be fine. Can you make it obvious because
> > there is already quite a bit of info and choices to look at.
> > Chris
> >> From: akme.baum...@gmail.com
> >> Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 01:53:55 -0700
> >> Subject: Re: new page for NTW
> >> To: neighbourhoodthatworks@googlegroups.com
> >> Hi Chris,
> >> see below
> >> 2009/8/21 Chris Baulman <chrisbaul...@hotmail.com>:
> >> > Hi Alex,
> >> > Re http://www.ntw.110mb.com/co-operator.htm
> >> > Can you create a separate page for the Garden Establishment Calendar so
> >> > I
> >> > can link to it directly from Hope Street Neighbourhood page?
> >> The reason the 'annual gardens calendar' and the 'establishment
> >> calendar' are together on one html page is that they share job tickets
> >> on that same page. (the job tickets have to be on the same page so the
> >> individual links work) If we create duplicate job tickets because we
> >> seperate the two calendars than if one is updated the other wont be
> >> and this would become a problem.
> >> I can put an active index on top of the page which hyperlinks to
> >> either the gardens establishment calendar or the annual gardens
> >> calendar so anyone who arrives at the page can instantly go to either.
> >> > Also,
> >> > The link ‘Use the Cooperator Forum’ takes people to a different forum
> >> > to
> >> > the one they have already been introduced to when they come from the
> >> > Hope
> >> > Street Neighbourhood page
> >> > http://groups.google.com.au/group/hope-street-neighbourhood?hl=en
> >> > What do you suggest?
> >> I'm not sure. They were intended for different purposes. One is to do
> >> with NTW discussion and the other was set up to host discussion about
> >> people's specific activity co-operators. I'm not really sure what the
> >> most ideal set up would be (the development of this new engagement
> >> resource you have been working on seems to suggest that each
> >> neighbourhood should set up their own discussion forum). I can't
> >> really see how broad NTW discussion and discussion about organising
> >> specific activities from all over the world could be mixed. While I do
> >> want mail about NTW daily I wouldn't want mail about an over 50s group
> >> in Tasmania daily. We have three forums we have set up. The NTW one,
> >> The Hope St and the Co-operator one. I'm not sure which ones are
> >> needed and which ones are not but I'm pretty sure they can't all be
> >> the same forum.
> >> Alex
> >> > Chris
> >> > ________________________________
> >> > Check the daily blob for the latest on what's happening around the web
> >> > What
> >> > goes online, stays online
_________________________________________________________________