Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion Breast is best, was Re: Internet survey - should mothers breastfeed in public?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
CAROL KENNON  
View profile  
 More options May 24 2000, 5:00 pm
Newsgroups: alt.parenting.solutions, alt.support.breastfeeding, misc.kids.breastfeeding
From: CAROL KENNON <c.ken...@worldnet.att.net>
Date: 2000/05/24
Subject: Re: Breast is best, was Re: Internet survey - should mothers breastfeed in public?

stephanie6...@my-deja.com wrote:
> What you say is certainly true. I got a little annoyed with the
> extemism of a particular poster.

> Stephanie

> In article <00e3495a.19696...@usw-ex0103-024.remarq.com>,
>   Circe <circeNOciS...@worldnet.att.net.invalid> wrote:
> > In article <8gej28$s8...@nnrp1.deja.com>, stephanie6217@my-
> > deja.com wrote:
> > >If I eat a well balanced meal, I am giving my body proper
> > nutrition. If
> > >I eat a McDonald's hamburger, I am denying my body "proper"
> > nutrition.
> > >And it is never going to kill me.

> > But if you do it every day and never eat a balanced diet, the
> > likelihood is pretty high that it *will* kill you. Oh, you won't
> > die from the hamburgers. You'll die from heart disease, a
> > stroke, colon cancer, or the like. But your poor eating habits
> > will have been at least partially responsible for your disease.
> > Moral of the above: Don't use an analogy when the analogy proves
> > the other person's point.

This is so true. The extremism and hyperbole is actually
counterproductive because it turns people off so much. I get a little
sick of hearing about risks of formula as opposed to benefits of
breastmilk. Talking about risks instead of benefits is taking a negative
approach. Breastmilk helps protect against infections which is clearly a
benefit. Some people like to coach this in terms of formula producing a
risk of infection because it doesn't protect like breastmilk does. That
is like saying Amoxicillin is risky because it doesn't cover as many ear
infection bacteria as well as Augmentin. Or a shirt is risky because it
doesn't protect against bullets as well as a bullet proof vest does. The
logic is somewhat convoluted because the risk is only relative to the
absence of benefit provided by the alternative. Adopting this
perspective just seems to me to add a judgemental quality and is
negative rather than positive. Hearing about benefits is positive and
adds encouragement. Putting a negative spin on formula by referring to
risks is an unnecessary bummer.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google