Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion Use of the word "Nazi" WAS: Re: Breast is best, was Re: Internet survey - should mothers breastfeed in public?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Anna Evans  
View profile  
 More options May 20 2000, 5:00 pm
Newsgroups: misc.kids.breastfeeding, alt.support.breastfeeding
From: "Anna Evans" <evnsa...@home.com>
Date: 2000/05/20
Subject: Re: Use of the word "Nazi" WAS: Re: Breast is best, was Re: Internet survey - should mothers breastfeed in public?

Emily Roysdon <em...@artoo.net.remove> wrote in message

news:8fvkjg$5q8$1@dfw-ixnews3.ix.netcom.com...

> And furthermore, just WHY would the benefit diminish?  I mean, let's take
> carrots, a healthy food; if I eat carrots daily for a year, do they
suddenly
> stop giving me vitamins and cease to be healthy because I've been eating
> them for a year?  Maybe I'm missing something here, but I don't see how
the
> perfect food could become less beneficial, provided the child is eating a
> healthy companion diet as needed.

I am pro-breastfeeding, and I do originate in the Breastfeeding newsgroup.
However, this one is always coming up, and the answer is this:

Let's say you eat carrots daily for a year, and for argument's sake, nothing
else. Obviously the nutrients within the carrot are vital, because it is the
sole constituent of your diet. Now let's say that after a year you start to
consume a normal, healthy diet. You continue to eat the carrots, but they
are less important to your diet, because you are consuming other things as
well.

Same with breastmilk. It continues to be an excellent food. However MOST
children WILL be eating a wide variety of solid foods by the age of 1. So
although the nutritional value of breastmilk per se does not diminish, the
importance of breastmilk as a provider of nutrients does, quite naturally.
Some might also suggest that after the age of 1, breastmilk is NOT actually
THE perfect food for your child. It is a good food, certainly, and there is
no reason to wean at that point. But it lacks iron, and also if your 1 year
old was surviving solely on breastmilk, you might have concerns that they
were not learning the socialisation aspects that solid food brings.

Anna


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google