> Kendra <kendr...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
> news:8fcf3a$r89$1@nnrp1.deja.com...
> :
> : Really?  Would that be the same ones who said, "It's unfortunate you
> : were unable to breastfeed but that still doesn't make formula the
best
> : thing for your baby." ?!?!?!?
> :
> : Thats far from acknowledgement.  That's insensitivity.

> You are, I believe, referring to one of my posts. However, despite
your use
> of quotation marks, this is not what I wrote.

> What I actually wrote was:

> "If you were unable to lactate, that is unfortunate, but it does not
mean
> that formula is a better product for it."

> First, you are using the statement out of context, as it was a
response to a
> specific statement. Second, I did not say anything about how
appropriate the
> use of formula was for any specific baby. I wrote about formula in
general.
> This is not the same thing at all, which some here seem to have
difficulty
> in understanding the difference between discussing a product in
general, &
> their own situations in particular.

> Formula is not made a better product through being essential in a few
> circumstances. It may have been essential in those circumstances, but
its
> merits as a product are exactly the same regardless.

> If you are going to quote me (or anyone else) in future, I would
appreciate
> your quoting accurately.

> Deborah