|
|
misc.kids.breastfeeding |
In misc.kids.breastfeeding image <imaginat...@spamno.com> wrote: >> Your child has really NEVER been sick in his/her entire life? You are > I am not following your bf child is never sick? > You shouldn't have to stretch the truth! Naomi
> "Naomi Lynne Pardue" <npar...@steel.ucs.indiana.edu> wrote in message Nope. Didn't say that. Statistically, formula fed babies are sick more
> news:8f7e2o$dc0$1@flotsam.uits.indiana.edu...
>> > Of course not. Nevertheless, I'm still waiting to find out how my using
>> > formula burdened the tax system and/or the health care system.
>> certain that your child will never BE sick in his/her entire life?
than breastfed babies. Statisically insurance companies spend more for
the health care of formula fed babies than they do for the care of
breastfed babies. So, unless a given FF baby is NEVER sick, and NEVER
needs to see a doctor, you cannot be sure that that particular illness
would not have occured had the baby been breastfed.
>> Formula also destroys quality of life. Formula also kills. There are Formula RARELY kills a baby directly. But formula (or, more specifically,
>> times when it is necessary (as starvation would destroy quality of life
>> or kill with even more certainty), but it is still a product that kills
>> people.
> Formula does not kill! Are you actually hearing (or seeing) what you have
> said, it makes no sense.
the lack of breastmilk) leads to more illnesses. Some of those sick babies
die.
Not riding in a carseat does not kill babies. Babies die when they are
thrown through the windshield. So does this mean that carseats don't save
lives?
>> And I can't see attempting rational discussion with someone who can't In some ways they are. In some ways they are not.
>> understand the concept of 'analogy.'
> You have to realize the smoking and formula are not "analgous". It is just
> stupid to consider it as such.