Ten Swine Flu Lies Told by the Mainstream Media

by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor

http://www.naturalnews.com/027055_swine_flu_vaccines_swine_flu_vaccin...

(NaturalNews) The mainstream media is engaged in what we Americans call
"bald faced lies" about swine flu. It seems to be true with this issue more
than any other, and it became apparent to me recently when a colleague of
mine -- a nationally-syndicated newspaper columnist -- told me their column
on natural defenses for swine flu was rejected by newspapers all across the
country. Many newspapers refused to run the column and, instead, ran an ad
for "free vaccine clinics" in the same space.

The media, it seems, is so deeply in bed with the culture of vaccinations
that they will do almost anything to keep the public misinformed. And that
includes lying about swine flu vaccines.

There are ten key lies that continue to be told by the mainstream media
(MSM) about swine flu and swine flu vaccines.

Lie #1 - There are no adjuvants used in the vaccines

I was recently being interviewed by a major U.S. news network when the
reporter interviewing me came up with this humdinger: There are no adjuvants
being used in the swine flu vaccines, he said!

I assured him that adjuvants were, indeed, a crucial part of the vaccine
recipe, and they were being widely used by drug companies to "stretch" the
vaccine supply. It's no secret. But he insisted he had been directly told by
a drug company rep that no adjuvants were being used at all. And he believed
them! So everything being published by this large news network about swine
flu vaccines now assumes there are no adjuvants in the vaccines at all.
Lie #2 - The swine flu is more dangerous than seasonal flu

This lie is finally starting to unravel. I admit that in the early days of
this pandemic, even I was concerned this could be a global killer. But after
observing the very mild impact the virus was having on people in the real
world, it became obvious that this was a mild flu, no more dangerous than a
seasonal flu.

The MSM, however, continues to promote H1N1 swine flu as being super
dangerous, driving fear into the minds of people and encouraging them to
rush out and get a vaccine shot for a flu that's really no more likely to
kill them than the regular winter sniffles. Sure, the virus could still
mutate into something far worse, but if it does that, the current vaccine
could be rendered obsolete anyway!
Lie #3 - Vaccines protect you from swine flu

This is the biggest lie of all, and the media pushes it hard. Getting a
vaccine, they insist, will protect you from the swine flu. But it's just
flat-out false. Even if the vaccine produces antibodies, that's not the same
thing as real-world immunity from a live virus, especially if the virus
mutates (as they often do).

As I pointed out in a recent article, statistically speaking the average
American is 40 times more likely to be struck by lightning than to have
their life saved by a swine flu vaccine. (
http://www.naturalnews.com/026955_s...)
Lie #4 - Vaccines are safe

And how would any journalists actually know this? None of the vaccines have
been subjected to real-world testing for any meaningful duration. The
"safety" of these vaccines is nothing more than wishful thinking.

The MSM also doesn't want you to know what's in the vaccines. Some vaccines
are made from viral fragments grown in diseased African monkeys. If that
sounds incredible, read the true story here:
http://www.naturalnews.com/026779_s...
Lie #5 - The vaccine isn't mandatory

You hear this lie all the time: The swine flu vaccine shot is voluntary,
they say. But it's not true if you're an employee at a place where vaccines
are being mandated. Millions of Americans are now being told by their
employers that if they don't get vaccine shots, they will be effectively
fired from their jobs. It's especially true with health care workers, day
care employees and school teachers.
Lie #6 - Getting a vaccine shot is a good bet on your health

In reality, a vaccine shot is far more likely to harm you than help you.
According to one viral expert, the actual mortality rate of the swine flu
virus is estimated to be as low as .007 percent (
http://www.reuters.com/article/heal...). That means H1N1 swine flu kills
less than one person in 100,000. Even if the vaccine works, let's say, 10
percent of the time, you'd have to vaccine one million people to prevent one
death from swine flu.

And in vaccinating one million people, you would inevitably harm or kill
several people, simply from the vaccine side effects! Your net risk of death
is increased by getting a swine flu vaccine.
Lie #7 - The vaccine isn't made with "attenuated live virus"

When the swine flu vaccines were first being announced several months ago,
they were described as being made with "attenuated live virus." This was
directly mentioned in CDC documents, among other places.

This term apparently freaked out the American news consumer, and it has
since been all but erased from any discussion about vaccines. Now,
journalists will actually argue with you and insist the vaccines contain no
attenuated live viruses whatsoever.

Except they're wrong. The vaccines are, indeed, made with "attenuated live
viruses." That's how you make a vaccine: You take live viruses, then you
weaken them ("attenuate") and inject them into people.
Lie #8 - Wash, wash, wash your hands (to avoid exposure)

This idea of washing your hands a hundred times a day is all based on the
assumption that you can avoid exposure to the swine flu virus. But that's
impractical. The virus is now so widespread that virtually everyone is
certain to be exposed to it through the air if not other means. This whole
idea of avoiding exposure to the swine flu virus is nonsense. The
conversation should shift to ways to survive exposure via a healthy immune
system.

Of course, hand washing is a very good idea in a hospital setting. Recent
news reveals that doctors are too busy to wash their own hands, resulting in
the rampant spread of superbugs throughout most large hospitals in first
world nations.
Lie #9 - Children are more vulnerable to swine flu than adults

This is just a flat-out lie, but it makes for good vaccine sales. Vaccines
are right now being targeted primarily to schoolchildren.

But the truth is that swine flu is extremely mild in children. "It's mildest
in kids," says Dr Marc Lipsitch of Harvard University. "That's one of the
really good pieces of news in this pandemic." Reuters actually had the guts
to report this story, but most of the larger media outlets are still
reporting that children are the most vulnerable.
Lie #10 - There is nothing else you can do beyond a vaccine and Tamiflu

This is where the media lies by omission. The mainstream media absolutely
refuses to print just about any story that talks about using vitamin D,
anti-viral herbs or natural remedies to protect yourself from swine flu. In
the MSM, there are two options and only two: Vaccines and Tamiflu. That's
it. No other options exist in their fictional reality.

Why is the mainstream media so afraid to print the truth these days? Why
can't reporting on swine flu see the light of day... literally, with a
mention of sunlight and vitamin D? Apparently, Big Pharma has such a tight
grip on mainstream newspapers that no true story on swine flu can ever make
it past the editor's desk.
Killing stories, deceiving the public

It must really be depressing to work for the mainstream media. Even the
reporters I know can't stand it. The truth, they admit, rarely makes it into
print.

Over the last few years, I've had a couple of job offers from large media
outlets. They want to pay me a six-figure salary and stick me behind a desk
where they can control what I report. Needless to say, I routinely reject
those offers. If I can't write the truth like I do here on NaturalNews.com,
there's no point writing at all. In too many ways, the mainstream media has
become little more than a corporate mouthpiece, whoring itself out to the
highest bidder / advertiser.

It's no fault of the frontline reporters who actually work there. For the
most part, they agree with what I'm saying. It's the fault of the
profit-oriented corporate mindset where news is about selling newspapers
rather than actually informing the public.

Important news stories get killed every day in the newsrooms across America.
They get killed not because they are poorly investigated or poorly written,
but because they upset advertisers and corporate string pullers who shape
the news and reject any stories that threaten their own financial interests.

You did notice John, that the author believes in
the germ theory. He is just claiming that on balance
the flu vaccines has more risks that it is worth
for the bulk of the population.

I do agree the mainstream media (or is that men having
sex with men) contributes to ignorance or a distorted s
sense of the world. Indeed much nonmainstream media
is also contributing to ignorance in many ways as well.
The local MSM newspaper is just an hack creation
and its online rightist competitor is even worse.

That this virus isn't a big killer is clear.

"Could Patrick Swayze have saved his own life with natural medicine?
Absolutely. Without question. Even late-stage pancreatic cancer can be
reversed (yes, reversed) with full-on naturopathic treatments
involving Chinese herbal medicine, deep body detoxification that
includes sweat saunas and colon cleansing, radical changes in diet
from "dead" foods to "live" foods, a healthy dose of vitamin D and the
daily consumption of raw anti-cancer living juices made from fresh,
organic produce like cabbage, broccoli and garlic. "

Compare that blather with the facts:-

Pancreatic Proteolytic Enzyme Therapy Compared With Gemcitabine-Based
Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer.
Chabot JA, Tsai WY, Fine RL, Chen C, Kumah CK, Antman KA, Grann VR.

METHODS: All patients were seen by one of the investigators at
Columbia University, and patients who received enzyme therapy were
seen by the participating alternative practitioner. All met strict
clinical criteria for eligibility.

Of 55 patients who had inoperable pancreatic cancer, 23 elected
gemcitabine-based chemotherapy, and 32 elected enzyme treatment, which
included pancreatic enzymes, nutritional supplements, detoxification,
and an organic diet. Primary and secondary outcomes were overall
survival and quality of life, respectively.

RESULTS: At enrollment, the treatment groups had no statistically
significant differences in patient characteristics, pathology, quality
of life, or clinically meaningful laboratory values.

Kaplan-Meier analysis found a 9.7-month difference in median survival
between the chemotherapy group (median survival, 14 months) and enzyme
treatment groups (median survival, 4.3 months) and found an
adjusted-mortality hazard ratio of the enzyme group compared with the
chemotherapy group of 6.96 (P < .001).

At 1 year, 56% of chemotherapy-group patients were alive, and 16% of
enzyme-therapy patients were alive. The quality of life ratings were
better in the chemotherapy group than in the enzyme-treated group (P <
.01).

In this study (Gonzalez), a total of 22 Kelley pancreatic cancer patients
properly diagnosed by the orthodox medical community were broken down into
three groups based on their level of following Kelley's protocol. The median
survival of the three groups is shown as:

        Unit One: Ten patients never followed the protocol: average survival
67 days.

        Unit Two: Seven patients followcd the protocol partially, avcragc
233 days survival.

        Unit Three: The five patients which followed Kelley's protocol
completely achieved an average of nine years survival.

[Dr Kelly says] "The Direct Cause of Cancer is The Changing of an
Ectopic Germ Cell into an Ectopic Trophoblast Cell.  The direct cause
of cancer, according to our research, is the changing of an ectopic
germ cell into an ectopic trophoblast cell. An excess of female sex
hormones brings about this change....The new baby will fall out of the
uterus unless something happens fast"

"Eighty-Six Percent of All Cancers Could Be Controlled and/or
Prevented By Diet and Pancreatic Enzymes"

Number cured in the controlled study - zero.  Not a single one.  

If you want to make a case that Dr. Gonzalez and the Members
of Congress who pushed this trial are biased, by all means
do so.