>Happy Oyster: >What does some bizarre herbal treatment this wonk went through for >back pain have anything to do with the topic of chemo for cancer >patients? Enlighten me, I fail to see the connection.
If you mean the .sig: The general link is "alternative healing methods". But, in short, I change, the .sigs quite often.
And, do not forget, that chemo-therapy IS effective. It has a small share in the whole mosaic of possible treatment methods. In about 3 percent of the cases, chemo-therapy alone is responsible for the patient's survival, in the other cases it is effective as an additional tool to a main therapy. --
> >> Petey would object to breathing if it were developed by medical > >> science.
> >It's true. Chemotherapy is a cancer on healthcare because it does not > >extend life or affect cure in the majority of cancers, as proved by > >German doctor Ulrich Abel in his book, "Chemotherapy of Advanced > >Epithelial Cancer." You should read it.
> That is pure idiocy and paranoia.
> Simple fact is: one can count the survivors and those who die. It is as simple > as that. And then one finds, that chemotherapy alone is saving at least 3 > percent of the cancer patients. In the other cases it is an addition to a main > therapy and supports that.
> Also, do note, that I phoned with Prof. Abel. His works of that early time are > by will misinterpreted by esotters. a) His study was made a long time ago and b) > it concerned only some very special sitations.
Liar. You have not spoken with Prof. Abel and your ignorance of the available science threatens your promotion of chemo on behalf of your sponsors. If I'm wrong, post any data or citation proving otherwise. I'll wait.
> Prof. Abel is angry about the abuse of his work by esotters.
There is no abuse of his research by anyone other than you.
>> >> Petey would object to breathing if it were developed by medical >> >> science.
>> >It's true. Chemotherapy is a cancer on healthcare because it does not >> >extend life or affect cure in the majority of cancers, as proved by >> >German doctor Ulrich Abel in his book, "Chemotherapy of Advanced >> >Epithelial Cancer." You should read it.
>> That is pure idiocy and paranoia.
>> Simple fact is: one can count the survivors and those who die. It is as simple >> as that. And then one finds, that chemotherapy alone is saving at least 3 >> percent of the cancer patients. In the other cases it is an addition to a main >> therapy and supports that.
>> Also, do note, that I phoned with Prof. Abel. His works of that early time are >> by will misinterpreted by esotters. a) His study was made a long time ago and b) >> it concerned only some very special sitations.
>Liar. You have not spoken with Prof. Abel and your ignorance of the >available science threatens your promotion of chemo on behalf of your >sponsors. If I'm wrong, post any data or citation proving otherwise. >I'll wait.
Your stupidity can't be greater, can't it? Prof. Abel works in Germany, I live in Germany, and, whould you guess, in Germany they have telephone... ! It is quite easy to phone with Prof. Abel, and I did it on several occasions.
>> Prof. Abel is angry about the abuse of his work by esotters.
>There is no abuse of his research by anyone other than you.
You are writing insane crap. -- Schwerer Pfusch Arzneimittelprüfung
> >> >> Petey would object to breathing if it were developed by medical > >> >> science.
> >> >It's true. Chemotherapy is a cancer on healthcare because it does not > >> >extend life or affect cure in the majority of cancers, as proved by > >> >German doctor Ulrich Abel in his book, "Chemotherapy of Advanced > >> >Epithelial Cancer." You should read it.
> >> That is pure idiocy and paranoia.
> >> Simple fact is: one can count the survivors and those who die. It is as simple > >> as that. And then one finds, that chemotherapy alone is saving at least 3 > >> percent of the cancer patients. In the other cases it is an addition to a main > >> therapy and supports that.
> >> Also, do note, that I phoned with Prof. Abel. His works of that early time are > >> by will misinterpreted by esotters. a) His study was made a long time ago and b) > >> it concerned only some very special sitations.
> >Liar. You have not spoken with Prof. Abel and your ignorance of the > >available science threatens your promotion of chemo on behalf of your > >sponsors. If I'm wrong, post any data or citation proving otherwise. > >I'll wait.
> Your stupidity can't be greater, can't it?
IOW, you cannot produce a shred of evidence contradicting the published work of Dr. Abel. Instead, you manufacture a lie and hope no one will notice.
> Prof. Abel works in Germany, I live > in Germany, and, whould you guess, in Germany they have telephone... !
Unfortunately, you don't have a brain. Dr. Abel would not entertain a fool such as yourself.
> It is > quite easy to phone with Prof. Abel, and I did it on several occasions.
Sure you did.
> >> Prof. Abel is angry about the abuse of his work by esotters.
You are the only one abusing it.
> >There is no abuse of his research by anyone other than you.
> NaturalNews.com printable article > Originally published September 17 2009
> Why are so many celebrities dying after chemotherapy? > by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor
Here is an article you may find of interest. A very interesting note by the authors at the end of the paper - “this emphasizes the need for high-level evidence before new treatments, however promising they seem, are adopted into routine medical practice.” Evidence based medicine seems to have failed here.
Chemotherapy at High Dose for Breast Cancer a Failure
High dose chemotherapy is a treatment that uses very high doses of chemotherapy in an attempt to kill all the cancer cells. The bone marrow is not able to tolerate such high doses of chemotherapy, therefore bone marrow stem cells from the patient are collected prior to chemotherapy to give back to the patient once high dose chemotherapy is completed.
A study in the May issue of the Annals of Oncology confirms that this form of treatment provided no advantage over conventional chemotherapy in long-term survival. The study analyzed 2 groups of patients – one receiving standard chemotherapy and the other receiving high dose therapy or HDT.
At the end of the study in the conventional group of 137 patients 33% had died and 40% had a first recurrence of breast cancer and in the HDT group 38% had died and 43% had a first recurrence of breast cancer. The relapse free/survival rate was “59% and 57%” in the conventional chemotherapy and HDT groups, respectively.
The high dose chemotherapy group clearly suffered a great deal more adverse treatment-related effects:
Nausea/Vomiting occurred in 5% of the conventional group and 46% of the high dose group.
Mucositis, or inflammation of the mouth lining, contributing to pain and difficulty swallowing occurred in 2% of the conventional group and 22% of the high dose group.
Hair loss or alopecia occurred in 9% of the conventional group and 100% of the high dose group.
Leucpenia, or decrease in the number of white blood cells, occurred in 14% of the conventional group and 100% of the high dose group.
Thrombocytopenia, or a decrease in the number of platelets in the blood, resulting in the potential for increased bleeding and decreased ability for clotting occurred in 0% of the conventional group and 100% of the high dose group.
Neutropenic fever, fever due to infections that develop after an individual’s white blood cells have decreased, occurred in 3% of the conventional group and 24% of the high dose group.
Although quality of life was not documented in this study other studies have demonstrated significantly “worse quality of life for patients” receiving high dose chemotherapy at 3-6 months. Although at 1 year the differences between the high dose and conventional groups in severity of symptoms had narrowed and were no longer significantly different.
It is estimated that over 40,000 women with primary breast cancer have received high dose therapy outside of randomized trials in the 1990s when no randomized trials were available. This and other studies have now demonstrated that there is no benefit for such a treatment strategy.
The authors unfortunately note that, “this emphasizes the need for high-level evidence before new treatments, however promising they seem, are adopted into routine medical practice.”
On Oct 2, 1:52 pm, Happy Oyster <happy.oys...@ariplex.com> wrote:
<nothing intelligible>
From wiki.answers.com: "The sensory organs of bivalves (e.g, oysters) are not well developed, and are largely a function of the posterior mantle margins. The organs are usually tentacles and most are typically mechanoreceptors and chemoreceptors."
I think that says it all. The oyster is a tool of industry and has shit for brains.
On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 09:13:26 -0700 (PDT), PeterB <p...@mytrashmail.com> wrote: >On Oct 2, 9:51 am, Happy Oyster <happy.oys...@ariplex.com> wrote: >> On Thu, 1 Oct 2009 08:11:42 -0700 (PDT), PeterB <p...@mytrashmail.com> wrote: >> >On Sep 29, 5:00 pm, Happy Oyster <happy.oys...@ariplex.com> wrote: >> >> On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:15:45 -0700 (PDT), PeterB <p...@mytrashmail.com> wrote: >> >> >On Sep 29, 3:10 pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> On Sep 29, 2:49 pm, PeterB <p...@mytrashmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> > <nothing intelligible>
>> >> >> Petey would object to breathing if it were developed by medical >> >> >> science.
>> >> >It's true. Chemotherapy is a cancer on healthcare because it does not >> >> >extend life or affect cure in the majority of cancers, as proved by >> >> >German doctor Ulrich Abel in his book, "Chemotherapy of Advanced >> >> >Epithelial Cancer." You should read it.
>> >> That is pure idiocy and paranoia.
>> >> Simple fact is: one can count the survivors and those who die. It is as simple >> >> as that. And then one finds, that chemotherapy alone is saving at least 3 >> >> percent of the cancer patients. In the other cases it is an addition to a main >> >> therapy and supports that.
>> >> Also, do note, that I phoned with Prof. Abel. His works of that early time are >> >> by will misinterpreted by esotters. a) His study was made a long time ago and b) >> >> it concerned only some very special sitations.
>> >Liar. You have not spoken with Prof. Abel and your ignorance of the >> >available science threatens your promotion of chemo on behalf of your >> >sponsors. If I'm wrong, post any data or citation proving otherwise. >> >I'll wait.
>> Your stupidity can't be greater, can't it?
>IOW, you cannot produce a shred of evidence contradicting the >published work of Dr. Abel. Instead, you manufacture a lie and hope >no one will notice.
>> Prof. Abel works in Germany, I live >> in Germany, and, whould you guess, in Germany they have telephone... !
>Unfortunately, you don't have a brain. Dr. Abel would not entertain a >fool such as yourself.
>> It is >> quite easy to phone with Prof. Abel, and I did it on several occasions.
>Sure you did.
Oh, now you liar admit that I phoned with Prof. Abel.
You have quite a lot to confess, I dare say. Like about WHO PAYS JAN DREW?
The Hamer scene is responsible for hundreds of dead! ****************************************************
<quote> Tot durch Ryke Geerd Hamer ========================== Die Totenliste ==============
149. Todesfall bekannt geworden
12.8.2008
Menschen starben. Sie starben wegen Hamer. Doch seine Anhänger hörten nicht auf zu behaupten, daß es durch Hamer keinen einzigen Todesfall gäbe.
Hamer's Anhänger verbreiten Lügen, angetrieben durch kriminelle Psychopathen und skrupellose Geschäftemacher, wie Hamer selbst.
Auch als Sören Wechselbaum starb, bei dem es ohne jeden Zweifel klar war, daß er wegen Hamer gestorben war, und daß er hätte gerettet werden können, wenn er NICHT auf Hamer gehört hätte, logen Hamer's Anhänger in unverminderter Härte weiter.
Deshalb begann ich 2002, die mir bekannten Todesfälle in dieser Liste zusammenzutragen.
Tote durch Hamer:
Mir namentlich bekannte Tote bzw durch Akten bekannt
1 Todesfall 1, Akten des "Stern"* * 43 Tote aus den Jahren 1982, 1983 2 Todesfall 2, Akten des "Stern"* '82, '83, unter anderem in 1982, 1983 3 Todesfall 3, Akten des "Stern"* Zusammenhang mit Hamer in 1982, 1983 4 Todesfall 4, Akten des "Stern"* Gyhum, in "Rosenhof", sowie 1982, 1983 5 Todesfall 5, Akten des "Stern"* weiteren seiner Stätten 1982, 1983 6 Todesfall 6, Akten des "Stern"* Menschenvernichtung 1982, 1983 7 Todesfall 7, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 8 Todesfall 8, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 9 Todesfall 9, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 10 Todesfall 10, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983
11 Todesfall 11, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 12 Todesfall 12, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 13 Todesfall 13, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 14 Todesfall 14, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 15 Todesfall 15, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 16 Todesfall 16, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 17 Todesfall 17, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 18 Todesfall 18, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 19 Todesfall 19, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 20 Todesfall 20, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983
21 Todesfall 21, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 22 Todesfall 22, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 23 Todesfall 23, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 24 Todesfall 24, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 25 Todesfall 25, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 26 Todesfall 26, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 27 Todesfall 27, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 28 Todesfall 28, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 29 Todesfall 29, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 30 Todesfall 30, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983
31 Todesfall 31, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 32 Todesfall 32, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 33 Todesfall 33, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 34 Todesfall 34, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 35 Todesfall 35, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 36 Todesfall 36, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 37 Todesfall 37, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 38 Todesfall 38, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 39 Todesfall 39, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 40 Todesfall 40, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983
41 Todesfall 41, Akten des "Stern"* Frau Strecker, Rosenhof 1982? 42 Todesfall 42, Akten des "Stern"* Luise Harksen, Rosenhof 1982? 43 Todesfall 43, Akten des "Stern"* Oswald Zemelka, Rosenhof 1982, 1983 44 Uschi Fischer, Deutschland 28.9.1988
45 Todesfall 1, Österreich* * 50 Faelle aus Oesterreich, bis 1997 46 Todesfall 2, Österreich* * davon 40 Faelle durch die bis 1997 47 Todesfall 3, Österreich* Aerztekammer Steiermark bis 1997 48 Todesfall 4, Österreich* ermittelt bis 1997 49 Todesfall 5, Österreich* bis 1997 50 Todesfall 6, Österreich* bis 1997
51 Todesfall 7, Österreich* bis 1997 52 Todesfall 8, Österreich* bis 1997 53 Todesfall 9, Österreich* bis 1997 54 Todesfall 10, Österreich* bis 1997 55 Todesfall 11, Österreich* bis 1997 56 Todesfall 12, Österreich* bis 1997 57 Todesfall 13, Österreich* bis 1997 58 Todesfall 14, Österreich* bis 1997 59 Todesfall 15, Österreich* bis 1997 60 Todesfall 16, Österreich* bis 1997
61 Todesfall 17, Österreich* bis 1997 62 Todesfall 18, Österreich* bis 1997 63 Todesfall 19, Österreich* bis 1997 64 Todesfall 20, Österreich* bis 1997 65 Todesfall 21, Österreich* bis 1997 66 Todesfall 22, Österreich* bis 1997 67 Todesfall 23, Österreich* bis 1997 68 Todesfall 24, Österreich* bis 1997 69 Todesfall 25, Österreich* bis 1997 70 Todesfall 26, Österreich* bis 1997
71 Todesfall 27, Österreich* bis 1997 72 Todesfall 28, Österreich* bis 1997 73 Todesfall 29, Österreich* bis 1997 74 Todesfall 30, Österreich* bis 1997 75 Todesfall 31, Österreich* bis 1997 76 Todesfall 32, Österreich* bis 1997 77 Todesfall 33, Österreich* bis 1997 78 Todesfall 34, Österreich* bis 1997 79 Todesfall 35, Österreich* bis 1997 80 Todesfall 36, Österreich* bis 1997
81 Todesfall 37, Österreich* bis 1997 82 Todesfall 38, Österreich* bis 1997 83 Todesfall 39, Österreich* bis 1997 84 Todesfall 40, Österreich* bis 1997 85 Todesfall 41, Österreich* bis 1997 86 Todesfall 42, Österreich* bis 1997 87 Todesfall 43, Österreich* bis 1997 88 Todesfall 44, Österreich*
...
<quote> Tot durch Ryke Geerd Hamer ========================== Die Totenliste ==============
149. Todesfall bekannt geworden
12.8.2008
Menschen starben. Sie starben wegen Hamer. Doch seine Anhänger hörten nicht auf zu behaupten, daß es durch Hamer keinen einzigen Todesfall gäbe.
Hamer's Anhänger verbreiten Lügen, angetrieben durch kriminelle Psychopathen und skrupellose Geschäftemacher, wie Hamer selbst.
Auch als Sören Wechselbaum starb, bei dem es ohne jeden Zweifel klar war, daß er wegen Hamer gestorben war, und daß er hätte gerettet werden können, wenn er NICHT auf Hamer gehört hätte, logen Hamer's Anhänger in unverminderter Härte weiter.
Deshalb begann ich 2002, die mir bekannten Todesfälle in dieser Liste zusammenzutragen.
Tote durch Hamer:
Mir namentlich bekannte Tote bzw durch Akten bekannt
1 Todesfall 1, Akten des "Stern"* * 43 Tote aus den Jahren 1982, 1983 2 Todesfall 2, Akten des "Stern"* '82, '83, unter anderem in 1982, 1983 3 Todesfall 3, Akten des "Stern"* Zusammenhang mit Hamer in 1982, 1983 4 Todesfall 4, Akten des "Stern"* Gyhum, in "Rosenhof", sowie 1982, 1983 5 Todesfall 5, Akten des "Stern"* weiteren seiner Stätten 1982, 1983 6 Todesfall 6, Akten des "Stern"* Menschenvernichtung 1982, 1983 7 Todesfall 7, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 8 Todesfall 8, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 9 Todesfall 9, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 10 Todesfall 10, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983
11 Todesfall 11, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 12 Todesfall 12, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 13 Todesfall 13, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 14 Todesfall 14, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 15 Todesfall 15, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 16 Todesfall 16, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 17 Todesfall 17, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 18 Todesfall 18, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 19 Todesfall 19, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 20 Todesfall 20, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983
21 Todesfall 21, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 22 Todesfall 22, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 23 Todesfall 23, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 24 Todesfall 24, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 25 Todesfall 25, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 26 Todesfall 26, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 27 Todesfall 27, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 28 Todesfall 28, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 29 Todesfall 29, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 30 Todesfall 30, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983
31 Todesfall 31, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 32 Todesfall 32, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 33 Todesfall 33, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 34 Todesfall 34, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 35 Todesfall 35, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 36 Todesfall 36, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 37 Todesfall 37, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 38 Todesfall 38, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 39 Todesfall 39, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983 40 Todesfall 40, Akten des "Stern"* 1982, 1983
41 Todesfall 41, Akten des "Stern"* Frau Strecker, Rosenhof 1982? 42 Todesfall 42, Akten des "Stern"* Luise Harksen, Rosenhof 1982? 43 Todesfall 43, Akten des "Stern"* Oswald Zemelka, Rosenhof 1982, 1983 44 Uschi Fischer, Deutschland 28.9.1988
45 Todesfall 1, Österreich* * 50 Faelle aus Oesterreich, bis 1997 46 Todesfall 2, Österreich* * davon 40 Faelle durch die bis 1997 47 Todesfall 3, Österreich* Aerztekammer Steiermark bis 1997 48 Todesfall 4, Österreich* ermittelt bis 1997 49 Todesfall 5, Österreich* bis 1997 50 Todesfall 6, Österreich* bis 1997
51 Todesfall 7, Österreich* bis 1997 52 Todesfall 8, Österreich* bis 1997 53 Todesfall 9, Österreich* bis 1997 54 Todesfall 10, Österreich* bis 1997 55 Todesfall 11, Österreich* bis 1997 56 Todesfall 12, Österreich* bis 1997 57 Todesfall 13, Österreich* bis 1997 58 Todesfall 14, Österreich* bis 1997 59 Todesfall 15, Österreich* bis 1997 60 Todesfall 16, Österreich* bis 1997
61 Todesfall 17, Österreich* bis 1997 62 Todesfall 18, Österreich* bis 1997 63 Todesfall 19, Österreich* bis 1997 64 Todesfall 20, Österreich* bis 1997 65 Todesfall 21, Österreich* bis 1997 66 Todesfall 22, Österreich* bis 1997 67 Todesfall 23, Österreich* bis 1997 68 Todesfall 24, Österreich* bis 1997 69 Todesfall 25, Österreich* bis 1997 70 Todesfall 26, Österreich* bis 1997
71 Todesfall 27, Österreich* bis 1997 72 Todesfall 28, Österreich* bis 1997 73 Todesfall 29, Österreich* bis 1997 74 Todesfall 30, Österreich* bis 1997 75 Todesfall 31, Österreich* bis 1997 76 Todesfall 32, Österreich* bis 1997 77 Todesfall 33, Österreich* bis 1997 78 Todesfall 34, Österreich* bis 1997 79 Todesfall 35, Österreich* bis 1997 80 Todesfall 36, Österreich* bis 1997
81 Todesfall 37, Österreich* bis 1997 82 Todesfall 38, Österreich* bis 1997 83 Todesfall 39, Österreich* bis 1997 84 Todesfall 40, Österreich* bis 1997 85 Todesfall 41, Österreich* bis 1997 86 Todesfall 42, Österreich* bis 1997 87 Todesfall 43, Österreich* bis 1997 88 Todesfall 44, Österreich* bis 1997 89 Todesfall 45, Österreich* bis 1997 90 Todesfall 46, Österreich* bis 1997
91 Todesfall 47, Österreich* bis 1997 92 Todesfall 48, Österreich* bis 1997
93 Todesfall 49, Österreich* Dunja Huszar, 21 Jahre, ? 94 Todesfall 50, Österreich* Mario W., 9 Jahre, 1995 95 Jean-Patrick VIVES, Frankreich 1995? 96 Brigitte JASSERAND, Frankreich 21.07.1995 97 Sylviane SALVI, Frankreich 1995? 98 Martine VAN DERMEERSCH, Frankreich 1995? 99 Monsieur MARLIOT, Frankreich 1995? 100 Georges MADAR, Frankreich 1995?
101 Anne-Marie TRIGON, Frankreich 1995? 102 Marc Frechet, Frankreich ? 103 Jocelyne BELLIARD, Frankreich 1995? 104 Marie-Claude CHAVIN, Frankreich 1995? 105 Lucie GELIS, ein kleines Maedchen, Frankreich 1995? 106 Yves HENRIET, Frankreich 30.06.1996 107 Angelo Amstutz, Schweiz 03.12.1996 108 Gaby, die Tocher von Roselore Huber, Schweiz 2000 109 Karin [...], geborene von Gunten, Gebärmutterhalskrebs 15.11.2000 110 Françoise Gonnet-Millet, Frankreich 03.07.2002
111 Frau Schommers, Belgien 2002 112 Sören Wechselbaum, Deutschland 01.07.2002 113 Thomas Zabler, Deutschland 26.09.2002 114 Robin (von Tine), Deutschland 29.12.2002 115 59jährige Krebskranke (Gerichtsakten?), Deutschland ? 116
...
In message <75e77941-9524-4082-b6d8-0a0d5347c...@p36g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>, PeterB wrote:
> On Sep 25, 8:11 am, "D. C. Sessions" <d...@lumbercartel.com> wrote: >> In message <710ce71d-426e-42e2-b768-f156095b3...@m20g2000vbp.googlegroups.com>, PeterB wrote:
>> > One can truthfully say that chemotherapy is a cancer on healthcare and >> > a failure in the majority of cancers. Read "World Without Cancer" by >> > Ed Griffin.
>> If you define "truth" as "I really believe it."
> No, chemotherapy is a cancer on healthcare because it does not extend > life or affect cure in the majority of cancers, as proved by German > doctor Ulrich Abel in his book, "Chemotherapy of Advanced Epithelial > Cancer." You should read it.
Ah, yes -- again the appeal to authority. And a misrepresentation of the supposed authority to boot.
-- | The brighter the stupid burns, the more | | chance that someone will see the light. | +- D. C. Sessions <d...@lumbercartel.com> -+
In message <6cef998e-45ae-4d9b-8ce9-7282459e1...@r24g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, Vern wrote:
> Celebrities are dying of chemo at the same rate as anyone else who > takes the treatment. With a few specific exceptions, chemotherapy > demonstrates no real advantage in survival benefits for cancer > sufferers, knocks down the immune system, can damage vital organs and > even cause death. Not to mention the suffering of the patients who > blindly accept the treatment because their oncologist advises it.
What is the 10-year survival rate for untreated non-Hodgkins lymphoma?
-- | The brighter the stupid burns, the more | | chance that someone will see the light. | +- D. C. Sessions <d...@lumbercartel.com> -+
Log on to Find out how you can make money by clicking my Web Site. You will find good Affiiliates for health products, such as EDTA-Oral Chelation, Apricot kernels for cancer treament, Other affiliates are for Computers, household products, Satellite TV (You may watch International Channel on your Computer), Download Commmercial Movies, Email, Free Horoscope.
> Celebrities are dying of chemo at the same rate as anyone else who > takes the treatment. With a few specific exceptions, chemotherapy > demonstrates no real advantage in survival benefits for cancer > sufferers, knocks down the immune system, can damage vital organs and > even cause death. Not to mention the suffering of the patients who > blindly accept the treatment because their oncologist advises it.
> I don't know which is more tragic, patients who do not inform > themselves and take responsibility for their own treatment, or > professionals who continue to administer a treatment that is clearly > devastating and ineffective.
