Reports of miscarriages resulting from the H1N1 vaccine shot November 6, 2009 at 7:00 pm (Uncategorized) Tags: h1n1 bird flu birdflu swine flu swineflu h5n1 pandemic ott deagle eisenstein cassel vaclib nvic dissent resistance vaccine vaccination toxic adjuvants mf-59 squalene genocide who cdc nih globalists ge
[this completely breaks my heart. i am so sad for all those would-be mothers and their unborn children. thanks to Wayne Prante of FalseFlagFlu.com for passing this along. -ed]
Some Pregnant Women Fearful of H1N1 Vaccine Miscarriage / Pregnancy Loss Blog
By Krissi Danielsson, About.com Guide to Miscarriage / Pregnancy Loss Tuesday September 29, 2009
An article in Minneapolis Star Tribune reports on how some pregnant women are skeptical of the new H1N1 vaccine. Pregnant women are among the groups strongly advised to get the vaccine, but many women are less than thrilled about the idea of getting the shot, reporting concerns about the safety of the vaccine and possible effects for the unborn baby.
I can definitely see where they are coming from, being someone who was concerned about safety of pretty much everything when I was pregnant. And there’s not much research on the safety of any type of flu vaccine during the first trimester, much less thimerosal exposure in the first trimester, although the CDC says that flu vaccination is advisable in any trimester during a pandemic. Still, there are definite risks to catching the flu during pregnancy also — and pregnant women seem to be at higher risk of having severe complications (including death) from H1N1 flu in particular. As with most cases, all you can really do is weigh the risks and benefits of both courses of action and discuss your concerns with your doctor — then make an informed choice on how to proceed. What are your thoughts? Do you plan to get the H1N1 flu vaccine, especially if you are currently pregnant or hope to become pregnant in the near future? Vote here.
Comments (from readers)
October 9, 2009 at 2:41 pm (1) Jo says: I got the flu vaccine (regular not H1N1) at 8 weeks pregnant. Three days later I miscarried. I am not going to get the H1N1.
October 26, 2009 at 11:07 am (2) Regrets says: I got both vaccines on Thursday. I was 9 weeks pregnant. I miscarried on Sunday. I was told by several doctors to get these vaccines. Now I wish I followed my gut feeling and not get them at ALL!
October 29, 2009 at 8:33 am (3) :( says: i work in a hospital like setting and was told ‘the benefits outweigh the risks” 1am i got the vaccine, 3am i started bleeding and craming, 3pm miscarried. you decide
October 31, 2009 at 1:29 pm
(4) sue says: I had the H1N1 vaccination and 24 hours later had a miscarriage.
October 31, 2009 at 8:25 pm (5) Linda Hill says: My daughter in law was 10 weeks pregnant and had the H1N1 vaccine on Friday that night she miscarried.
Poll Results About Poll Would or Will You Get the H1N1 Swine Flu Vaccination During Pregnancy? Yes, without reservations. (11) 3% Yes. I'm concerned about the safety but the flu scares me more than the vaccine. (44) 12% No, I will not be getting the vaccine. (256) 70% I'm not sure. (53) 14% Total Votes: 364
Reports improvable and hearsay. But take them as a positive, k?
5 cites possible miscarriage after preggie 1000 cites no problem with preggie mom.
Then what do you do? Given that it is a possible pandemic, pregnant mom gets the flu, gives it to her children who then die, gives it to her husband who goes near death, gives it to her parents and parents in law and one parent from each side dies. Gives the flu to others around her and 25% of those people die, who give it to others and so on and so on.
Now, given that you know the probable/possible outcome should the pregnant mom take the "shot"?
Animal reproduction studies have not been conducted with Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine Live, Intranasal or FluMist. It is not known whether Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine Live, Intranasal or FluMist can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman or can affect reproduction capacity. Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine Live, Intranasal or FluMist should be given to a pregnant woman only if clearly needed.
8.1 Pregnancy Pregnancy Category C: Animal reproduction studies have not been conducted with Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine or AFLURIA. It is also not known whether these vaccines can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman or can affect reproduction capacity. Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine should be given to a pregnant woman only if clearly needed. 8.3 Nursing Mothers Neither Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine nor AFLURIA has been evaluated in nursing mothers. It is not known whether Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine or AFLURIA is excreted in human milk. Because many drugs are excreted in human milk, caution should be exercised when Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine is administered to a nursing woman. 8.4 Pediatric Use Neither Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine nor AFLURIA has been evaluated in children. Safety and effectiveness in the pediatric population have not been established.
8.1. Pregnancy Pregnancy Category C: Animal reproduction studies have not been conducted with Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine or Fluzone vaccine. It is also not known whether these vaccines can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman or can affect reproduction capacity. Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine should be given to a pregnant woman only if clearly needed. 8.3. Nursing Mothers It is not known whether Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine or Fluzone vaccine is excreted in human milk. Because many drugs are excreted in human milk, caution should be exercised when this vaccine is administered to a nursing woman.
> Reports improvable and hearsay. But take them as a positive, k?
> 5 cites possible miscarriage after preggie > 1000 cites no problem with preggie mom.
> Then what do you do? Given that it is a possible pandemic, pregnant mom > gets the flu, gives it to her children who then die, gives it to her > husband who goes near death, gives it to her parents and parents in law > and one parent from each side dies. Gives the flu to others around her > and 25% of those people die, who give it to others and so on and so on.
> Now, given that you know the probable/possible outcome should the > pregnant mom take the "shot"?
> Save one life or save hundreds?
> Be reasonable if you can.
What statistics are you looking at to find a 25% death rate from getting the swine flu? From my understanding, unless you are in a high risk factor group, the sympoms are not any worse than the regular flu.
Show me a population anywhere that currently is experiencing the swine flu where there has been a 25% death rate. Definately not here in the USA...
> Animal reproduction studies have not been conducted with Influenza A > (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine Live, Intranasal or FluMist. It is not > known whether Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine Live, > Intranasal or FluMist can cause fetal harm when administered to a > pregnant woman or can affect reproduction capacity. Influenza A > (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine Live, Intranasal or FluMist should be > given to a pregnant woman only if clearly needed.
> 8.1 Pregnancy > Pregnancy Category C: Animal reproduction studies have not been > conducted with Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine or AFLURIA. > It is also not known whether these vaccines can cause fetal harm when > administered to a pregnant woman or can affect reproduction capacity. > Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine should be given to a pregnant > woman only if clearly needed. > 8.3 Nursing Mothers > Neither Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine nor AFLURIA has been > evaluated in nursing mothers. It is not known whether Influenza A (H1N1) > 2009 Monovalent Vaccine or AFLURIA is excreted in human milk. Because > many drugs are excreted in human milk, caution should be exercised when > Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine is administered to a nursing > woman. > 8.4 Pediatric Use > Neither Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine nor AFLURIA has been > evaluated in children. Safety and effectiveness in the pediatric > population have not been established.
> 8.1. Pregnancy > Pregnancy Category C: Animal reproduction studies have not been > conducted with Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine or Fluzone > vaccine. It is also not known whether these vaccines can cause fetal > harm when administered to a pregnant woman or can affect reproduction > capacity. Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine should be given to > a pregnant woman only if clearly needed. > 8.3. Nursing Mothers > It is not known whether Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine or > Fluzone vaccine is excreted in human milk. Because many drugs are > excreted in human milk, caution should be exercised when this vaccine is > administered to a nursing woman.
With so many 'unknowns' how can any vaccine company the cdc, who or any other gov't agency claim these vaccines have been tested and are safe?
Population control through vaccine???? Why not become like China and regulate how many children people can have? It would be a lot safer than f-cking around with the immune system via vaccines. I'm not sure I buy all this conspiracy theory crap anyway. But, I guess almost anything is possible.
It all just sounds a little too far fetched for me.
> Population control through vaccine???? Why not become like China and > regulate how many children people can have? It would be a lot safer > than f-cking around with the immune system via vaccines. I'm not sure > I buy all this conspiracy theory crap anyway. But, I guess almost > anything is possible.
> It all just sounds a little too far fetched for me.-
We are still a "Christian" Nation, I dont believe forced abortions would go over very well in this country, or forced sterilization.
> Reports improvable and hearsay. But take them as a positive, k?
> 5 cites possible miscarriage after preggie > 1000 cites no problem with preggie mom.
> Then what do you do? Given that it is a possible pandemic, pregnant mom > gets the flu, gives it to her children who then die, gives it to her > husband who goes near death, gives it to her parents and parents in law > and one parent from each side dies. Gives the flu to others around her > and 25% of those people die, who give it to others and so on and so on.
This scenario is pure fiction, especially 25% part.
Pandemic my a**. WHO changed the official definition of this word just before declaring the pandemic. According to the previous definition of pandemic the disease had to cause massive illness and death. Now it would suffice to be present worldwide and cause more cases than normal.
Meanwhile, in Poland there were 193 cases of H1N1 flu with no fatalities (as of 2 days ago). But 6 people died from the vaccine.
>> Population control through vaccine???? Why not become like China and >> regulate how many children people can have? It would be a lot safer >> than f-cking around with the immune system via vaccines. I'm not sure >> I buy all this conspiracy theory crap anyway. But, I guess almost >> anything is possible.
>> It all just sounds a little too far fetched for me.-
>We are still a "Christian" Nation, I dont believe forced abortions
Sorry toots. we were never a 'christian' nation. you need to read a bit more history before you make such a stupid statement.
It is actually stated in a ratified Treaty that we are not a christian nation.
>would go over very well in this country, or forced sterilization.
> Reports improvable and hearsay. But take them as a positive, k?
> 5 cites possible miscarriage after preggie > 1000 cites no problem with preggie mom.
> Then what do you do? Given that it is a possible pandemic, pregnant > mom > gets the flu, gives it to her children who then die, gives it to her > husband who goes near death, gives it to her parents and parents in > law > and one parent from each side dies. Gives the flu to others around her > and 25% of those people die, who give it to others and so on and so > on.
> Now, given that you know the probable/possible outcome should the > pregnant mom take the "shot"?
> Save one life or save hundreds?
> Be reasonable if you can.
What statistics are you looking at to find a 25% death rate from getting the swine flu? From my understanding, unless you are in a high risk factor group, the sympoms are not any worse than the regular flu.
Show me a population anywhere that currently is experiencing the swine flu where there has been a 25% death rate. Definately not here in the USA... ===================================================== Why didn't you answer my question?
>> Reports improvable and hearsay. But take them as a positive, k?
>> 5 cites possible miscarriage after preggie >> 1000 cites no problem with preggie mom.
>> Then what do you do? Given that it is a possible pandemic, pregnant >> mom gets the flu, gives it to her children who then die, gives it to >> her husband who goes near death, gives it to her parents and parents >> in law and one parent from each side dies. Gives the flu to others >> around her and 25% of those people die, who give it to others and so >> on and so on.
> This scenario is pure fiction, especially 25% part.
> Pandemic my a**. WHO changed the official definition of this word just > before declaring the pandemic. According to the previous definition > of pandemic the disease had to cause massive illness and death. Now it > would suffice to be present worldwide and cause more cases than > normal.
> Meanwhile, in Poland there were 193 cases of H1N1 flu with no > fatalities (as of 2 days ago). But 6 people died from the vaccine.
Say anything but avoid answering the question, eh?
No one died from the vaccine yet, but you would rather believe hearsay and bs.
> On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 19:40:09 -0800 (PST), in misc.health.alternative, > Kevysmom <kevysmo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Population control through vaccine???? Why not become like China and >>> regulate how many children people can have? It would be a lot safer >>> than f-cking around with the immune system via vaccines. I'm not sure >>> I buy all this conspiracy theory crap anyway. But, I guess almost >>> anything is possible.
>>> It all just sounds a little too far fetched for me.-
>>We are still a "Christian" Nation, I dont believe forced abortions
> Sorry toots. we were never a 'christian' nation. > you need to read a bit more history before you make such a stupid > statement.
> It is actually stated in a ratified Treaty that we are not a > christian nation.
>>would go over very well in this country, or forced sterilization.
Damn! Bob, what are you doing? Why do you think that it is OK for you to be correct? Now what? Are you going to change everything and be right now?
>> Reports improvable and hearsay. But take them as a positive, k?
>> 5 cites possible miscarriage after preggie >> 1000 cites no problem with preggie mom.
>> Then what do you do? Given that it is a possible pandemic, pregnant mom >> gets the flu, gives it to her children who then die, gives it to her >> husband who goes near death, gives it to her parents and parents in law >> and one parent from each side dies. Gives the flu to others around her >> and 25% of those people die, who give it to others and so on and so on.
>> Now, given that you know the probable/possible outcome should the >> pregnant mom take the "shot"?
>> Save one life or save hundreds?
>> Be reasonable if you can.
> What statistics are you looking at to find a 25% death rate from > getting the swine flu? From my understanding, unless you are in a > high risk factor group, the sympoms are not any worse than the regular > flu.
> Show me a population anywhere that currently is experiencing the swine > flu where there has been a 25% death rate. Definately not here in the > USA... > ===================================================== > Why didn't you answer my question?
>>> Reports improvable and hearsay. But take them as a positive, k?
>>> 5 cites possible miscarriage after preggie >>> 1000 cites no problem with preggie mom.
>>> Then what do you do? Given that it is a possible pandemic, pregnant mom >>> gets the flu, gives it to her children who then die, gives it to her >>> husband who goes near death, gives it to her parents and parents in law >>> and one parent from each side dies. Gives the flu to others around her >>> and 25% of those people die, who give it to others and so on and so on.
>> This scenario is pure fiction, especially 25% part.
>> Pandemic my a**. WHO changed the official definition of this word just >> before declaring the pandemic. According to the previous definition >> of pandemic the disease had to cause massive illness and death. Now it >> would suffice to be present worldwide and cause more cases than normal.
>> Meanwhile, in Poland there were 193 cases of H1N1 flu with no >> fatalities (as of 2 days ago). But 6 people died from the vaccine.
> Say anything but avoid answering the question, eh?
> No one died from the vaccine yet, but you would rather believe hearsay and > bs.
> Answer my question, that was all I asked.
Pertr, why do you want so many to be hurt and killed ?
> Reports of miscarriages resulting from the H1N1 vaccine shot > November 6, 2009 at 7:00 pm (Uncategorized) > Tags: h1n1 bird flu birdflu swine flu swineflu h5n1 pandemic ott > deagle eisenstein cassel vaclib nvic dissent resistance vaccine > vaccination toxic adjuvants mf-59 squalene genocide who cdc nih > globalists ge
> [this completely breaks my heart. i am so sad for all those would-be > mothers and their unborn children. thanks to Wayne Prante of > FalseFlagFlu.com for passing this along. -ed]
> Some Pregnant Women Fearful of H1N1 Vaccine > Miscarriage / Pregnancy Loss Blog
> By Krissi Danielsson, About.com Guide to Miscarriage / Pregnancy Loss > Tuesday September 29, 2009
> An article in Minneapolis Star Tribune reports on how some pregnant > women are skeptical of the new H1N1 vaccine. Pregnant women are among > the groups strongly advised to get the vaccine, but many women are > less than thrilled about the idea of getting the shot, reporting > concerns about the safety of the vaccine and possible effects for the > unborn baby.
> I can definitely see where they are coming from, being someone who was > concerned about safety of pretty much everything when I was pregnant. > And there’s not much research on the safety of any type of flu vaccine > during the first trimester, much less thimerosal exposure in the first > trimester, although the CDC says that flu vaccination is advisable in > any trimester during a pandemic. Still, there are definite risks to > catching the flu during pregnancy also — and pregnant women seem to be > at higher risk of having severe complications (including death) from > H1N1 flu in particular. As with most cases, all you can really do is > weigh the risks and benefits of both courses of action and discuss > your concerns with your doctor — then make an informed choice on how > to proceed. > What are your thoughts? Do you plan to get the H1N1 flu vaccine, > especially if you are currently pregnant or hope to become pregnant in > the near future? Vote here.
> Comments (from readers)
> October 9, 2009 at 2:41 pm > (1) Jo says: I got the flu vaccine (regular not H1N1) at 8 weeks > pregnant. Three days later I miscarried. I am not going to get the > H1N1.
> October 26, 2009 at 11:07 am > (2) Regrets says: > I got both vaccines on Thursday. I was 9 weeks pregnant. I miscarried > on Sunday. I was told by several doctors to get these vaccines. Now I > wish I followed my gut feeling and not get them at ALL!
> October 29, 2009 at 8:33 am > (3) :( says: i work in a hospital like setting and was told ‘the > benefits outweigh the risks” 1am i got the vaccine, 3am i started > bleeding and craming, 3pm miscarried. you decide
> October 31, 2009 at 1:29 pm
> (4) sue says: I had the H1N1 vaccination and 24 hours later had a > miscarriage.
> October 31, 2009 at 8:25 pm > (5) Linda Hill says: My daughter in law was 10 weeks pregnant and had > the H1N1 vaccine on Friday that night she miscarried.
> Poll Results > About Poll > Would or Will You Get the H1N1 Swine Flu Vaccination During > Pregnancy? > Yes, without reservations. > (11) 3% > Yes. I'm concerned about the safety but the flu scares me more than > the vaccine. > (44) 12% > No, I will not be getting the vaccine. > (256) 70% > I'm not sure. > (53) 14% > Total Votes: 364
>>> Reports improvable and hearsay. But take them as a positive, k?
>>> 5 cites possible miscarriage after preggie >>> 1000 cites no problem with preggie mom.
>>> Then what do you do? Given that it is a possible pandemic, pregnant >>> mom gets the flu, gives it to her children who then die, gives it to >>> her husband who goes near death, gives it to her parents and parents >>> in law and one parent from each side dies. Gives the flu to others >>> around her and 25% of those people die, who give it to others and so >>> on and so on.
>> This scenario is pure fiction, especially 25% part.
>> Pandemic my a**. WHO changed the official definition of this word just >> before declaring the pandemic. According to the previous definition >> of pandemic the disease had to cause massive illness and death. Now it >> would suffice to be present worldwide and cause more cases than >> normal.
>> Meanwhile, in Poland there were 193 cases of H1N1 flu with no >> fatalities (as of 2 days ago). But 6 people died from the vaccine.
> Say anything but avoid answering the question, eh?
> No one died from the vaccine yet, but you would rather believe hearsay > and bs.
Google translation: *********************************************************************** Deputy Minister Adam Fronczak health, however, drew attention to the dangers arising from these vaccines. - So far in the country who bought a lot of influenza A/H1N1 vaccine, when administered to patients six people died. 2 immediately after admission, 4 - as the suspects - a few hours after vaccination. Adverse effects were also observed at the 190 nurses who had previously vaccinated against a new flu - he added. ***********************************************************************
So, it is NOT hearsay and bs. Death is a possible side effect.
> Answer my question, that was all I asked.
Your question was: what should be done if the mortality were 25% and your scenario were possible? Since this is fiction this question is moronic and does not deserve an answer.
In the current situation, women should be informed that it is not known whether H1N1 vaccine can inflict fetal harm or affect reproduction capacity. Then they can make decisions for themselves.
>>>> Reports improvable and hearsay. But take them as a positive, k?
>>>> 5 cites possible miscarriage after preggie >>>> 1000 cites no problem with preggie mom.
>>>> Then what do you do? Given that it is a possible pandemic, pregnant >>>> mom gets the flu, gives it to her children who then die, gives it >>>> to her husband who goes near death, gives it to her parents and >>>> parents in law and one parent from each side dies. Gives the flu to >>>> others around her and 25% of those people die, who give it to >>>> others and so on and so on.
>>> This scenario is pure fiction, especially 25% part.
>>> Pandemic my a**. WHO changed the official definition of this word >>> just >>> before declaring the pandemic. According to the previous definition >>> of pandemic the disease had to cause massive illness and death. Now >>> it >>> would suffice to be present worldwide and cause more cases than >>> normal.
>>> Meanwhile, in Poland there were 193 cases of H1N1 flu with no >>> fatalities (as of 2 days ago). But 6 people died from the vaccine.
>> Say anything but avoid answering the question, eh?
>> No one died from the vaccine yet, but you would rather believe >> hearsay and bs.
>> Answer my question, that was all I asked. > Pertr, why do you want so many to be hurt and killed ?
>>>> Reports improvable and hearsay. But take them as a positive, k?
>>>> 5 cites possible miscarriage after preggie >>>> 1000 cites no problem with preggie mom.
>>>> Then what do you do? Given that it is a possible pandemic, pregnant >>>> mom gets the flu, gives it to her children who then die, gives it >>>> to her husband who goes near death, gives it to her parents and >>>> parents in law and one parent from each side dies. Gives the flu to >>>> others around her and 25% of those people die, who give it to >>>> others and so on and so on.
>>> This scenario is pure fiction, especially 25% part.
>>> Pandemic my a**. WHO changed the official definition of this word >>> just >>> before declaring the pandemic. According to the previous definition >>> of pandemic the disease had to cause massive illness and death. Now >>> it >>> would suffice to be present worldwide and cause more cases than >>> normal.
>>> Meanwhile, in Poland there were 193 cases of H1N1 flu with no >>> fatalities (as of 2 days ago). But 6 people died from the vaccine.
>> Say anything but avoid answering the question, eh?
>> No one died from the vaccine yet, but you would rather believe >> hearsay and bs.
> Google translation: > *********************************************************************** > Deputy Minister Adam Fronczak health, however, drew attention to the > dangers arising from these vaccines. - So far in the country who > bought a lot of influenza A/H1N1 vaccine, when administered to > patients six people died. 2 immediately after admission, 4 - as the > suspects - a few hours after vaccination. Adverse effects were also > observed at the 190 nurses who had previously vaccinated against a new > flu - he added. > ***********************************************************************
> So, it is NOT hearsay and bs. Death is a possible side effect.
>> Answer my question, that was all I asked.
> Your question was: what should be done if the mortality were 25% and > your scenario were possible? Since this is fiction this question is > moronic and does not deserve an answer.
You are far more closed minded that I thought. Given your rational one day you will die as a direct result of it, or someone in your family.
> In the current situation, women should be informed that it is not > known > whether H1N1 vaccine can inflict fetal harm or affect reproduction > capacity. Then they can make decisions for themselves.
Based on what, fear? I am sorry that you are so prejudiced. Assuming you are over 21 years old I hope you realize the consequences of your actions without affecting the lives of others.
I allowed my disabled son to have the H1N1 vaccine
why?
Because, on my support group with disabled children, we lost three kids in one weekend from the swine flu and are on average losing one child a week.
Our disabled children are not handling this swine flu well at all. and if I didn't get my son the vaccine and he died, I wouldnt be able to live with myself.
It could have been the tamiflu that is killing the kids on my support group, I dont know.
I just know our kids are on heavy duty drugs to prevent life threatening seizures. (we had one young child pass away last week from the seizures) Maybe its a combination of tamiflu and the seizure medications...
> I allowed my disabled son to have the H1N1 vaccine
> why?
> Because, on my support group with disabled children, we lost three > kids in one weekend from the swine flu and are on average losing one > child a week.
> > I allowed my disabled son to have the H1N1 vaccine
> > why?
> > Because, on my support group with disabled children, we lost three > > kids in one weekend from the swine flu and are on average losing one > > child a week.
> That's out of how many children total?
It started in Sept.
we have lost I think eight children.
Our kids are severe/profoundy disabled on heavy duty drugs for seizures.
They died quickly, one day at the ER having chest X Rays coming back negative, sent home, Next day back in the ER, lungs are full and then within hours they are gone.
>> > I allowed my disabled son to have the H1N1 vaccine
>> > why?
>> > Because, on my support group with disabled children, we lost three >> > kids in one weekend from the swine flu and are on average losing >> > one >> > child a week.
>> That's out of how many children total?
> It started in Sept.
> we have lost I think eight children.
> Our kids are severe/profoundy disabled on heavy duty drugs for > seizures.
> They died quickly, one day at the ER having chest X Rays coming back > negative, sent home, Next day back in the ER, lungs are full and then > within hours they are gone.
> Im a Mom, I cant take that chance with my son.
You're not just a mom, you're a loving mom who cares for what's best when the chips are down. You did the right thing and have nothing to be ashamed of.
|
