Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Let's see if Mark S Probert will address his lie?
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  6 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Jan Drew  
View profile  
(1 user)  More options Nov 2, 12:15 pm
Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative, misc.kids.health, alt.support.breast-implant
From: Jan Drew <jdrew63...@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 17:15:13 -0800 (PST)
Local: Mon, Nov 2 2009 12:15 pm
Subject: Let's see if Mark S Probert will address his lie?
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.health.alternative/msg/f06b48baa0...

Jul 27, 2004

Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
From: "M,a,r,k P,r,o,b,e,r,t-July 23, 2004" <M,a,r,k P,r,o,b,e,r,t
07-23...@lymbercartel.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:35:11 GMT
Local: Fri, Jul 23 2004 10:35 am
Subject: Re: Asbestos Deaths Up

****[note that lie @lymbercartel.com]***

> >www.BreastImplantAwareness.org
> >Another longtime cover up:
Jan wrote:
> Hulda Clark has been warning people of mold and abestos for
> years,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,while other were busy calling her a quack.

People were correctly calling her a quack for many reasons, none
being
asbestos related.

The simple fact is that there is no cover-up regarding asbestos. In
the
1980's, under AHERA, schools nationwide removed tons of it.
Construction
companies were forced to perform abatement before renovations or
demolition.
There is no doubt that there are very sick people with asbestosis and
mesothelioma who were exposed to asbestos. I meet several of them
every
month and can usually find some documentation of their possible
exposure so
they can recevie WC benefits.

Backj in the 1950's and 1960's, there was no idea that asbestos
exposure
could be so dangerous. During WWII boat builders at the Navy Yards
were
routinely exposed to it, brought the dust home, and exposed their
families.
No one knew.

When I was in elementary school, I received a kit from a group in
Canada,
where asbestos was mined, called "Asbestos-The Magic Mineral." I
brought it
to school for a science project. No one knew.

Once the dangers became known, precautions were put in place, and,
eventually, abatement was begun. There is far less asbestos in our
environment to day, and HULDA CLARK HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH IT!

Anyone claiming that there was a cover-up is an liar.

-------------------------------------------

The EPA Comes Clean on Asbestos

EPA warning on asbestos is under attack Lawyers target materials
detailing
dangers in brakes

The federal government’s 17-
year effort to warn backyard and
professional mechanics of the
dangers of cancer-causing as-
bestos in brakes is under attack.

The deadly truth about asbestos
A brief chronology of what the owners and managers of asbestos
companies knew,
and when they knew it.

1890s
* Asbestos, which previously had few industrial uses, becomes a raw
material
for large manufacturing industries, exposing large numbers of workers
to
asbestos dust for the first time. Asbestos-caused disease often
develops
decades after a person was first exposed. As a result, it was not
until the
early 1900s that large numbers of workers developed symptoms.
David Kotelchuck, "Asbestos: ‘The Funeral Dress of Kings' - and
Others" in
Dying for Work: Workers' Safety and Health in Twentieth-Century
America, ed. by
David Rosner and Gerald Markowitz, Indiana University Press,
Bloomington, IN
1987, p193

1918
* A Prudential Insurance Company official notes that life insurance
companies
will not cover asbestos workers, because of the "health-injurious
conditions of
the industry."
Barry I. Castleman, Asbestos: Medical and Legal Aspects, 4th edition,
Aspen Law
and Business, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1996, p.5-6

1930
* Major asbestos company Johns-Manville produces report, for internal
company
use only, about medical reports of asbestos worker fatalities.
Barry I. Castleman, Asbestos: Medical and Legal Aspects, 4th edition,
Aspen Law
and Business, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1996, p.663

1932
* Letter from U.S. Bureau of Mines to asbestos manufacturer
Eagle-Picher
states: "It is now known that asbestos dust is one of the most
dangerous dusts
to which man is exposed."
Paul Brodeur, Outrageous Misconduct: The Asbestos Industry on Trial,
Pantheon
Books, New York NY, 1985, p.327

1933
* Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. doctors find that 29 percent of
workers in a
Johns-Manville plant have asbestosis.
Barry I. Castleman, Asbestos: Medical and Legal Aspects, 4th edition,
Aspen Law
and Business, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1996, p.26

* Johns-Manville officials settle lawsuits by 11 employees with
asbestosis on
the condition that the employees' lawyer agree to never again
"directly or
indirectly participate in the bringing of new actions against the
Corporation."

Paul Brodeur, Outrageous Misconduct: The Asbestos Industry on Trial,
Pantheon
Books, New York NY, 1985, p.114

1934
* Officials of two large asbestos companies, Johns-Manville and
Raybestos-Manhattan, edit an article about the diseases of asbestos
workers
written by a Metropolitan Life Insurance Company doctor. The changes
minimize
the danger of asbestos dust.
Paul Brodeur, Outrageous Misconduct: The Asbestos Industry on Trial,
Pantheon
Books, New York NY, 1985, p.114-15

1935
* Officials of Johns-Manville and Raybestos-Manhattan instruct the
editor of
Asbestos magazine to publish nothing about asbestosis.
Paul Brodeur, Outrageous Misconduct: The Asbestos Industry on Trial,
Pantheon
Books, New York NY, 1985, p.116

1936
* A group of asbestos companies agrees to sponsor research on the
health
effects of asbestos dust, but require that the companies maintain
complete
control over the disclosure of the results.
Barry I. Castleman, Asbestos: Medical and Legal Aspects, 4th edition,
Aspen Law
and Business, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1996, p.587

1942
* Internal Owens-Corning corporate memo refer to "medical literature
on
asbestosis . . . . scores of publications in which the lung and skin
hazards of
asbestos are discussed."
Barry I. Castleman, Asbestos: Medical and Legal Aspects, 4th edition,
Aspen Law
and Business, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1996, p.195

1942 or 1943
* The president of Johns-Manville says that the managers of another
asbestos
company were "a bunch of fools for notifying employees who had
asbestosis."
When one of the managers asks, "do you mean to tell me you would let
them work
until they dropped dead?" The response is reported to have been,
"Yes.
We save
a lot of money that way."
Testimony of Charles H. Roemer, Deposition taken April 25, 1984,
Johns-Manville
Corp., et al v. the United States of America, U.S. Claims Court Civ.
No.
465-83C, cited in Barry I. Castleman, Asbestos: Medical and Legal
Aspects, 4th
edition, Aspen Law and Business, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1996, p.581

1944
* Metropolitan Life Insurance Company report finds 42 cases of
asbestosis among
195 asbestos miners.
Barry I. Castleman, Asbestos: Medical and Legal Aspects, 4th edition,
Aspen Law
and Business, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1996, p.654

1951
* Asbestos companies remove all references to cancer before allowing
publication of research they sponsor.
Barry I. Castleman, Asbestos: Medical and Legal Aspects, 4th edition,
Aspen Law
and Business, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1996, p.71

1952
* Dr. Kenneth Smith, Johns-Manville medical director, recommends
(unsuccessfully) that warning labels be attached to products
containing
asbestos. Later Smith testifies: "It was a business decision as far
as
I could
understand . . . the corporation is in business to provide jobs for
people and
make money for stockholders and they had to take into consideration
the effects
of everything they did and if the application of a caution label
identifying a
product as hazardous would cut into sales, there would be serious
financial
implications."
Barry I. Castleman, Asbestos: Medical and Legal Aspects, 4th edition,
Aspen Law
and Business, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1996, p.666

1953
* National Gypsum's safety director writes to the Indiana Division of
Industrial Hygiene, recommending that acoustic plaster mixers wear
respirators
"because of the asbestos used in the product." Another company
official notes
that the letter is "full of dynamite," urges that it be retrieved
before
reaching its destination. A memo in the files notes that the company
"succeeded
in stopping" the letter, which "will be modified."
Barry I. Castleman, Asbestos: Medical and Legal Aspects, 4th edition,
Aspen Law
and Business, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1996, p.669-70

1964
* Dr. Irving Selikoff publishes a study of asbestos workers in the
Journal of
the American Medical Association, proving that people who work with
asbestos-containing materials have an abnormal incidence of
asbestosis, lung
cancer, and mesothelioma.
Barry I. Castleman, Asbestos: Medical and Legal Aspects, 4th edition,
Aspen Law
and Business, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1996, p.126

1966

* Raybestos-Manhattan official writes: "We feel that the recent

unfavorable
publicity over the use of asbestos fibers in many different kinds of
industries
has been a gross exaggeration of the problems. There is no data
available to
either prove or disprove the dangers of working closely with
asbestos."
Barry I. Castleman, Asbestos: Medical and Legal Aspects, 4th edition,
Aspen Law
and Business, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1996, p.590

1971
* First OSHA asbestos-exposure standard issued.
Federal Register, vol.36, p.10466 et. seq.; May 29, 1971

1973
* The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) bans spray-on
asbestos
insulation as an air pollution hazard.
Federal Register, vol.38, p.8820 et. seq.; April 6, 1973

1977
* Lawyers for injured workers obtain the Sumner Simpson papers, which
show that
the companies had suppressed information about the danger of asbestos
for at
least 40 years.
Paul Brodeur, Outrageous Misconduct: The Asbestos Industry on Trial,
Pantheon
Books, New York NY, 1985, p.111

* The first bill to limit the product liability of asbestos companies
is
introduced in Congress.
Paul Brodeur, Outrageous Misconduct: The Asbestos Industry on Trial,
Pantheon
Books, New York NY, 1985, p.194

1978
* Judge rules there had been "a conscious effort by the [asbestos]
industry in
the 1930s to downplay or arguably suppress, the dissemination of
information to
employees and the public for fear of the promotion of lawsuits."
Amended order, Barnett v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp et al, State
of
South
Carolina, County of Greenville, Court of Common Pleas, Aug. 23, 1978,
cited ...

read more »


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "More stalking, harassing and abuse from the usual suspect." by Mark Probert
Mark Probert  
View profile  
(1 user)  More options Nov 2, 12:23 pm
Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative, misc.kids.health, alt.support.breast-implant
From: Mark Probert <mark.prob...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 17:23:08 -0800 (PST)
Local: Mon, Nov 2 2009 12:23 pm
Subject: More stalking, harassing and abuse from the usual suspect.
On Nov 1, 8:15 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...@aol.com> wrote:

I addressed this issue back in 2004. The address is in the archives.

look it up.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "Let's see if Mark S Probert will address his lie?" by Jan Drew
Jan Drew  
View profile  
(1 user)  More options Nov 8, 11:26 am
Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative, misc.kids.health, alt.support.breast-implant
From: Jan Drew <jdrew63...@aol.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 16:26:36 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 11:26 am
Subject: Re: Let's see if Mark S Probert will address his lie?
On Nov 1, 8:15 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...@aol.com> wrote:

...

read more »


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "More stalking, harassing and abuse from the usual suspect." by Jan Drew
Jan Drew  
View profile  
(1 user)  More options Nov 8, 11:30 am
Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative, misc.kids.health, alt.support.breast-implant
From: Jan Drew <jdrew63...@aol.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 16:30:04 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 11:30 am
Subject: Re: More stalking, harassing and abuse from the usual suspect.
On Nov 1, 8:23 pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Nov 1, 8:15 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...@aol.com> wrote:

> >http://groups.google.com/group/misc.health.alternative/msg/f06b48baa0...

> > Jul 27, 2004

> I addressed this issue back in 2004. The address is in the archives.

> look it up.

You look it up.  You made the claim.  It is your respobsibility to
post it,  This is 2009

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "Let's see if Mark S Probert will address his lie?" by Mark Probert
Mark Probert  
View profile  
(1 user)  More options Nov 8, 12:49 pm
Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative, misc.kids.health, alt.support.breast-implant
From: Mark Probert <mark.prob...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 17:49:38 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 12:49 pm
Subject: Re: Let's see if Mark S Probert will address his lie?
On Nov 7, 7:26 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...@aol.com> wrote:

> On Nov 1, 8:15 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...@aol.com> wrote:

I addressed this issue back in 2004. The address is in the archives.

look it up.

Now, you whined the other day about posting nonsense, but, here you
did it twice, and that is a waste of bandwidth.

So, it is OK for you to do it, but not others?

Hmmm...

Animal Farm.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "More stalking, harassing and abuse from the usual suspect." by Mark Probert
Mark Probert  
View profile  
(1 user)  More options Nov 8, 12:51 pm
Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative, misc.kids.health, alt.support.breast-implant
From: Mark Probert <mark.prob...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 17:51:06 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 12:51 pm
Subject: Re: More stalking, harassing and abuse from the usual suspect.
On Nov 7, 7:30 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...@aol.com> wrote:

> On Nov 1, 8:23 pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > On Nov 1, 8:15 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...@aol.com> wrote:

> > >http://groups.google.com/group/misc.health.alternative/msg/f06b48baa0...

> > > Jul 27, 2004

> > I addressed this issue back in 2004. The address is in the archives.

> > look it up.

> You look it up.  You made the claim.  It is your respobsibility to
> post it,  This is 2009

No, YOU look it up, as you regurgitated it for your own nefarious
reasons.

If you do not want to look it up, then place it where the sun don't
shine. Just move your head out of you way and there should be enough
room.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google