Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion Performance Issue
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Chris  
View profile  
 More options Sep 16 2006, 6:36 am
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming
From: Chris <Ch...@discussions.microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 13:36:02 -0700
Local: Sat, Sep 16 2006 6:36 am
Subject: Performance Issue

SQL2000 Std Ed.

Customers table 4 million records

Users search by phone# - during periods of heavy use the cpu will peg to
100% and searches will take 20+ seconds.

Here's the facts:
- where cluase uses '... where fPhone like @TelNo '
- No blocking, stored proc uses (nolock) isol. level.
- Query plan uses index on fPhone field - total cost 1.895 and less w/ the
more numbers entered in search.
- No to < 5% fragmentation - rebuilt when at 5% or greater
- Run profiler - see duration at 20000 milliseconds (rules out the network -
def. db)
- For long running spid - run sp_lock and see TAB lock on customers table

Was troubleshooting w/ user - user app in asp connecting w/ ado over oledb -
I was witnessing user spid taking 20+ seconds, I would grab exact same query
in profiler and run in Query Analyzer - it would take 1 seconds in QA - user
runs again 20 seconds, I run in QA - 1 to 2 seconds. User runs same again -
20 seconds - data cache not speeding things up.

I am assuming the app is getting stuck on a procedure cache that somehow
ignores the index on fPhone and does table scan - searches with 2 or 3
numbers do table scan - searches where all 7 numbers entered - index used.
Perhaps 1 user enters 3 numbers to search on - table scan query plan saved in
cache - next user searches by 7 numbers - db uses query plan w/ table scan.

Is this table lock escalation - is that common during periods of high
activity?

Any ideas how to combat?

Thanks,
Chris


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google