| |
microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming |
where fPhone like @TelNo is @TelNo prefixed or suffixed with %? if you prefix the search string with % then you can't really use an index. Is it really necessary to search on part of a phone number? Would a use It would likely be faster to do where fPhone = @TelNo Also, you could have a problem with parameter sniffing, but I'll let those > SQL2000 Std Ed. > Customers table 4 million records > Users search by phone# - during periods of heavy use the cpu will peg to > Here's the facts: > Was troubleshooting w/ user - user app in asp connecting w/ ado over > I am assuming the app is getting stuck on a procedure cache that somehow > Is this table lock escalation - is that common during periods of high > Any ideas how to combat? > Thanks,
If you append the % then you can, but the fewer values entered the less
efficient it is to use the index.
ever not know the entire phone number?
more knowledgeable explain that.
> 100% and searches will take 20+ seconds.
> - where cluase uses '... where fPhone like @TelNo '
> - No blocking, stored proc uses (nolock) isol. level.
> - Query plan uses index on fPhone field - total cost 1.895 and less w/ the
> more numbers entered in search.
> - No to < 5% fragmentation - rebuilt when at 5% or greater
> - Run profiler - see duration at 20000 milliseconds (rules out the
network -
> def. db)
> - For long running spid - run sp_lock and see TAB lock on customers table
oledb -
> I was witnessing user spid taking 20+ seconds, I would grab exact same
query
> in profiler and run in Query Analyzer - it would take 1 seconds in QA -
user
> runs again 20 seconds, I run in QA - 1 to 2 seconds. User runs same
again -
> 20 seconds - data cache not speeding things up.
> ignores the index on fPhone and does table scan - searches with 2 or 3
> numbers do table scan - searches where all 7 numbers entered - index used.
> Perhaps 1 user enters 3 numbers to search on - table scan query plan saved
in
> cache - next user searches by 7 numbers - db uses query plan w/ table
scan.
> activity?
> Chris