| |
microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming |
My suspicions were correct. User running tel search, taking 15 seconds. Executed dbcc freeprocache User query now executing in 1 second response time. How is a bad plan getting stuck in cache? Is this a statistics issue or somehting? How do I rebuild/refresh stats? Thanks, > SQL2000 Std Ed. > Customers table 4 million records > Users search by phone# - during periods of heavy use the cpu will peg to > Here's the facts: > Was troubleshooting w/ user - user app in asp connecting w/ ado over oledb - > I am assuming the app is getting stuck on a procedure cache that somehow > Is this table lock escalation - is that common during periods of high > Any ideas how to combat? > Thanks,
Found TAB lock on cust table. Ran same query in QA - 1 second.
Index getting rebuilt when > 5% fragmentation.
Chris
> 100% and searches will take 20+ seconds.
> - where cluase uses '... where fPhone like @TelNo '
> - No blocking, stored proc uses (nolock) isol. level.
> - Query plan uses index on fPhone field - total cost 1.895 and less w/ the
> more numbers entered in search.
> - No to < 5% fragmentation - rebuilt when at 5% or greater
> - Run profiler - see duration at 20000 milliseconds (rules out the network -
> def. db)
> - For long running spid - run sp_lock and see TAB lock on customers table
> I was witnessing user spid taking 20+ seconds, I would grab exact same query
> in profiler and run in Query Analyzer - it would take 1 seconds in QA - user
> runs again 20 seconds, I run in QA - 1 to 2 seconds. User runs same again -
> 20 seconds - data cache not speeding things up.
> ignores the index on fPhone and does table scan - searches with 2 or 3
> numbers do table scan - searches where all 7 numbers entered - index used.
> Perhaps 1 user enters 3 numbers to search on - table scan query plan saved in
> cache - next user searches by 7 numbers - db uses query plan w/ table scan.
> activity?
> Chris