<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming</link>
  <description>Microsoft SQL Server newsgroup.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Join query returns to many rows</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/9a08c14b014622fa/ebfd97c6f67f99ff?show_docid=ebfd97c6f67f99ff</link>
  <description>
  Precisely why you should never code using the original ansi 89 style and use &lt;br&gt; infix instead... &lt;br&gt; Never code like this... &lt;br&gt; FROM {tbl} as a, {tbl} as b &lt;br&gt; WHERE a.tblkey = b.tblkey &lt;br&gt; AND a.postertype = &#39;opinionated&#39; &lt;br&gt; AND a.postername = &#39;--celko--&#39; &lt;br&gt; Instead you should write like the majority of other folk do....
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/9a08c14b014622fa/ebfd97c6f67f99ff?show_docid=ebfd97c6f67f99ff</guid>
  <author>
  tonyroger...@torver.net
  (Tony Rogerson)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 08:55:30 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Running value but with a string</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/9362aa06bd5ec1aa/4301142fd518cb6a?show_docid=4301142fd518cb6a</link>
  <description>
  Wrong - the standards a small subset of the product language available &lt;br&gt; within MICROSOFT SQL SERVER. &lt;br&gt; Wrong again - we&#39;ve already been through this one; there are very few items &lt;br&gt; of syntax that have been deprecated - legacy code written on SQL Server 6.5 &lt;br&gt; still works on SQL Server 2008 - that allows business to migrate versions of
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/9362aa06bd5ec1aa/4301142fd518cb6a?show_docid=4301142fd518cb6a</guid>
  <author>
  tonyroger...@torver.net
  (Tony Rogerson)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 08:51:59 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Sql Server on VMWare</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/d6b4c85859bb244f/3b50b09ccd43b6f8?show_docid=3b50b09ccd43b6f8</link>
  <description>
  Hi, &lt;br&gt; Can anybody give me some right direction or usefull link &lt;br&gt; 1. About VMware environment &lt;br&gt; 2. How to Install and configure Sql Server 2005 on VMware. &lt;br&gt; 3. Is there any performance change on VMware. &lt;br&gt; Regards &lt;br&gt; Rahul
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/d6b4c85859bb244f/3b50b09ccd43b6f8?show_docid=3b50b09ccd43b6f8</guid>
  <author>
  verma.car...@gmail.com
  (Rahul)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 07:23:59 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: SSIS hitting FK violation - need to ignore the error rows - have package succeed</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/eee56221ef1216db/3a891b2455a3144e?show_docid=3a891b2455a3144e</link>
  <description>
  oh thanks, i&#39;ll consider this also. both pieces of info where very &lt;br&gt; helpful!
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/eee56221ef1216db/3a891b2455a3144e?show_docid=3a891b2455a3144e</guid>
  <author>
  djohanns...@gmail.com
  (Dave)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 01:32:05 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Running value but with a string</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/9362aa06bd5ec1aa/58c91f45f6418717?show_docid=58c91f45f6418717</link>
  <description>
  You narrow your solutions by writing in dialect; you increase their &lt;br&gt; scope, maintainability and robustness by sticking to Standards. &lt;br&gt; Having something that runs in only one release of one version of one &lt;br&gt; SQL is not a good thing. &lt;br&gt; But strong dialect code gives you job security. Even better, write &lt;br&gt; your code in an unsupported version that only you know.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/9362aa06bd5ec1aa/58c91f45f6418717?show_docid=58c91f45f6418717</guid>
  <author>
  jcelko...@earthlink.net
  (--CELKO--)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 00:29:37 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Join query returns to many rows</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/9a08c14b014622fa/f4947f2b07f0d00b?show_docid=f4947f2b07f0d00b</link>
  <description>
  There are two forms of the SELECT [ALL | DISTINCT]; the SELECT ALL &lt;br&gt; keeps duplicate rows and the SELECT DISTINCT removes redundant &lt;br&gt; duplicate rows, leaving one copy. SELECT by itself is a shorthand for &lt;br&gt; SELECT ALL. You will find these keywords used in other parts of SQL &lt;br&gt; for this sort of thing. &lt;br&gt; As a generalization, a SELECT DISTINCT is a symptom of a bad query
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/9a08c14b014622fa/f4947f2b07f0d00b?show_docid=f4947f2b07f0d00b</guid>
  <author>
  jcelko...@earthlink.net
  (--CELKO--)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 00:10:56 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Transaction load</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/141b61d6627f0e18/291ee23e4abaf623?show_docid=291ee23e4abaf623</link>
  <description>
  Well how much something like this will affect the performance of the server &lt;br&gt; depends on many factors and is difficult to say without knowing much more &lt;br&gt; about it. But assuming you have properly configured hardware and place the &lt;br&gt; log files on their own Raid 1 or raid 10 it should not be a real problem.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/141b61d6627f0e18/291ee23e4abaf623?show_docid=291ee23e4abaf623</guid>
  <author>
  sqlmvpnooos...@shadhawk.com
  (Andrew J. Kelly)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 23:17:50 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Transaction load</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/141b61d6627f0e18/1242236343c776b0?show_docid=1242236343c776b0</link>
  <description>
  I asssumed you were talking about binary or text files. &lt;br&gt; You seem to talk about BCP/BULK INSERT type of load. Look at these commands &lt;br&gt; in details. &lt;br&gt; Check ROWS_PER_BATCH value; it might help you.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/141b61d6627f0e18/1242236343c776b0?show_docid=1242236343c776b0</guid>
  <author>
  some...@somewhere.com
  (Farmer)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:22:09 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Database Table Design</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/4ed7ef498b337e98/7054e4024556159b?show_docid=7054e4024556159b</link>
  <description>
  I will guess that you are getting stuck on the temporal aspect of the &lt;br&gt; model. &lt;br&gt; Since Computers and users are entities, you will need a table for each &lt;br&gt; of them. Computer Sessions will reference a user, a computer and a &lt;br&gt; start-end time pair for usage. UserGroups are a relationship among &lt;br&gt; users, so that table will have a group id, reference to the users and
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/4ed7ef498b337e98/7054e4024556159b?show_docid=7054e4024556159b</guid>
  <author>
  jcelko...@earthlink.net
  (--CELKO--)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 21:24:54 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>RE: Database Table Design</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/4ed7ef498b337e98/005ab9bcac5cef66?show_docid=005ab9bcac5cef66</link>
  <description>
  Yes, A user can be assigned to one or more computers but a computer can be &lt;br&gt; assigned to one user at a time. No relationship between a group and a &lt;br&gt; computer as I know but you can suggest me one if possible. &lt;br&gt; Here is more. &lt;br&gt; We open an account with a computer supplier to each of our groups{fiction &lt;br&gt; writers, technology writer etc}. The supplier assigns a number to each group.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/4ed7ef498b337e98/005ab9bcac5cef66?show_docid=005ab9bcac5cef66</guid>
  <author>
  j...@discussions.microsoft.com
  (Jama)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 21:21:01 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Modify statement to run sp_executesql</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/53c80a04a9fe2bdb/e9c6dc1029deb91c?show_docid=e9c6dc1029deb91c</link>
  <description>
  To expand on this, when you need a quote in a string it has to be escaped &lt;br&gt; with another single quote. &lt;br&gt; John
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/53c80a04a9fe2bdb/e9c6dc1029deb91c?show_docid=e9c6dc1029deb91c</guid>
  <author>
  jbellnewspo...@hotmail.com
  (John Bell)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 20:45:30 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>RE: Database Table Design</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/4ed7ef498b337e98/878470f0a35d3722?show_docid=878470f0a35d3722</link>
  <description>
  Can the user use multiple computers when he is tagged to one specific group? &lt;br&gt; Any relation between group and computer?
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/4ed7ef498b337e98/878470f0a35d3722?show_docid=878470f0a35d3722</guid>
  <author>
  augustinprasa...@discussions.microsoft.com
  (Augustin Prasanna)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 20:33:01 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Free Tools for SQL Server - SQLsoft.co.uk</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/f0f454cb88605607/3565886d4005dd1c?show_docid=3565886d4005dd1c</link>
  <description>
  Hi All, &lt;br&gt; We&#39;ve written a number of (I think!) handy tools over the past few &lt;br&gt; months which are available from here: &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.sqlsoft.co.uk/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; Newly released is SQLscripta, which both searches _and_ scripts &lt;br&gt; sprocs, functions, views and triggers, with searches being performed &lt;br&gt; across multiple databases - it&#39;s quick and makes a great alternative
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/f0f454cb88605607/3565886d4005dd1c?show_docid=3565886d4005dd1c</guid>
  <author>
  w...@crazy-pug.co.uk
  (Will)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 20:33:42 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Transaction load</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/141b61d6627f0e18/034f7812a105b290?show_docid=034f7812a105b290</link>
  <description>
  Thanks for the feedback. Each file actually consists of thousands of &lt;br&gt; records, each record targetting an appropriate table. The upload of all &lt;br&gt; records is an all-or-nothing deal. I want to make sure the system&#39;s not &lt;br&gt; going to explode if one day several hundred people try to upload their file &lt;br&gt; at the same time.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/141b61d6627f0e18/034f7812a105b290?show_docid=034f7812a105b290</guid>
  <author>
  _no_s...@_no_spam.com
  (Mike23)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 18:05:15 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Modify statement to run sp_executesql</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/53c80a04a9fe2bdb/67606833e70566ac?show_docid=67606833e70566ac</link>
  <description>
  Dynamic SQL is an advanced feature, and if you feel obliged to ask this &lt;br&gt; question, you should probably defer working with dynamic SQL, until you &lt;br&gt; master the basics better. &lt;br&gt; That said, I have an article on my web site, which covers dynamic SQL &lt;br&gt; in depth: &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.sommarskog.se/dynamic_sql.html&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/53c80a04a9fe2bdb/67606833e70566ac?show_docid=67606833e70566ac</guid>
  <author>
  esq...@sommarskog.se
  (Erland Sommarskog)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:53:56 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
