Message from discussion
Session Joining
Received: by 10.90.79.17 with SMTP id c17mr4968085agb.9.1233175185985;
Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:39:45 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <skree...@gmail.com>
Received: from yw-out-1718.google.com (yw-out-1718.google.com [74.125.46.153])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 22si1159534yxr.7.2009.01.28.12.39.44;
Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:39:44 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of skree...@gmail.com designates 74.125.46.153 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.46.153;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of skree...@gmail.com designates 74.125.46.153 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=skree...@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header...@gmail.com
Received: by yw-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 6so2692109ywa.88
for <kollaborative-frame@googlegroups.com>; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:39:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=Qq+poBJCC8TLJW6H01Zp2BIIw3sTmfRSBWNX/uG9UyU=;
b=OaK2I+CplQbheiZ3tVNrylXkz91a/XUT8gn0q0JAyr2nQs4rYN4Mpi8/T60tGjFouR
3z6Uipn89QpvEjewzXw05bwpKgT9Xoj5eHn5RZHxIz57Wspd7oOmaTSp6ktb5u9wrH8P
YUtj3lucjv2Amp9vKadtJPVwRDH6WAUEGFzd4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
b=IhVgZBL/cBUzoUsfBEk116rN6+N8HQCVQv0M6CDxssmPFRQtiDSL/o7h9871NgFpyl
be/S+53b0mTIG1Yb2ZyQmMx76LNTRZX7BpuReGVzQkbImeXQItMd7ojaEF05jPtoxqd5
5ToTBACA06Gy10pAfhsC7SQ+ALdt8H4krfblc=
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Received: by 10.100.144.11 with SMTP id r11mr3612056and.24.1233175178015; Wed,
28 Jan 2009 12:39:38 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <200901281230.59054.greg@greghaynes.net>
References: <beb2b09b-e76f-49cd-9c27-5c9bea25e7cf@t26g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
<200901281230.59054.g...@greghaynes.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:39:37 -0500
Message-ID: <3246ed240901281239t2ca0766by548f269b72ba5...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Session Joining
From: Roger Pixley <skree...@gmail.com>
To: kollaborative-frame@googlegroups.com
How heavy is the spec for what's needed to put up a libinfinity
server? is there much difference between just joining and sharing
notes or the full blown spec?
On 1/28/09, Gregory Haynes <g...@greghaynes.net> wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 28 January 2009 08:08:16 skree...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Well Session Joining is in now :) I have to ask does this mean that we
>> can use Kobby to join in any libinfinote sessions?
>
> I haven't tested it yet, but you should be able to. The only problem there
> might be is that Gobby now uses libinfinity-0.2 while libinfinitymm wraps
> version 0.1.2, but this should change pretty soon.
>
>>
>
> >
>
|
