Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
Message from discussion Kate editing event... and thoughts... part 2
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Roger Pixley  
View profile
 More options Apr 18, 2:32 am
From: "Roger Pixley" <skree...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:32:23 -0500
Local: Fri, Apr 18 2008 2:32 am
Subject: Re: Kate editing event... and thoughts... part 2
Seems like a good proposal the more that I think about it the better
it is to have a central server per user logged in. How would you deal
with non text type documents?

On 4/11/08, Michael Fair <mich...@daclubhouse.net> wrote:

> So assuming that you all bought into my prior model of using the MMORPG
> as the event model, and XMPP as the Message Bus for said events, the next
> thought I had was regarding the events themselves.

> Each event needs to communicate at least two things, what happened, and
> what did it happen to.  What is also good to know is what did it for
> authorization
> purposes.  At some point the security model where not all session members
> have complete control over the shared resource needs to be addressed.

> I propose using the Extensible Resource Identifier (XRI) (if you don't
> already
> know, please look it up as I can't explain it in this brief email) as they
> way of
> describing what did it happen to.  I'm sure some bright spark can also use
> it
> to describe the "What Happened" too.

> In short XRI has thought about how to address objects, their properties, and
> even fragments of the properties as well as attributes of all of the above.
> They
> took from URL and URI, and IRI (internationalized) and extended it so it fit
> well within a Federated XML world and could be referenced through
> "synonyms".
> In other words, multiple identifiers can be used to identify the same
> object.

> It's the federation and the synonums part (where different authorities can
> control different parts of the identifier) that really made me take notice.

> The folks who worked on that spec really thought this thing through and
> seemed
> to know the subject matter of what would be needed well.

> Thanks for the chance to share my thoughts,
> -- Michael --


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2008 Google