Kollaborative Frame Google Group

Re: Google SoC

g...@greghaynes.net (Gregory Haynes) — Thu, 25 Sep 2008 17:18:47 UT

A nice amount of work has been getting done: I'm preparing for the final
development run before posting for people to do testing. I set up trac
sites for Kobby and Libinfinitymm, they are at:
[link]
[link]
The doxygen docs on these sites is out of date so I suggest generating

Re: Google SoC

skree...@gmail.com (Roger Pixley) — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 20:49:28 UT

Just a bump. I was swamped for a month. What's been going on behind the
scenes?

Drat and double drat

skree...@gmail.com (Roger Pixley) — Thu, 14 Aug 2008 23:01:43 UT

[link]
Nothing worked on at akademy for kollaboration that got committed :-(

Re: Google SoC

skree...@gmail.com (Roger Pixley) — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 05:38:31 UT

So about life in general what do you make of it ?? and would it be
better with cmake?

Thanks for joining hope you stick around :) Those are some interesting
challenges you face and fully support hiding confusing naming brought
about by integration from users. We just need to make sure that's

Re: Google SoC

g...@greghaynes.net (greghaynes) — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 03:00:21 UT

Hello all,

I just joined the list, so if there are any questions regarding
Kobby's design thus far, the current development, or life in
general :) i'll be here to add in the discussion.

It was interesting reading about the sessions issue with infinote +
kate, and this was something I wrestled with a lot. I thought it was

Re: Google SoC

psychobr...@gmx.net (Andreas Ramm) — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:04:25 UT

Yeah the current project scope will be more than enough for the remaining time of the soc.

The most recently used idea is excellent. Just connect the last 5 used document and leave the others for later. I think it would actually be great for Kate to keep that information through session restarts anyway.

Re: Google SoC

skree...@gmail.com (Roger Pixley) — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 07:38:07 UT

Ha ha I just came here to post about his new blog :) Some of this may
be a bit longer term as I don't know if we want him to take on things
which are out of scope for his project or would make him run over
schedule. Another thing that occurred to me is that we could keep the
MRU documents and restart session connections for a threshold while

Re: Google SoC

psychobr...@gmx.net (Andreas Ramm) — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 23:19:54 UT

I think you are onto something when you say "good saving of a session could make restoring one easier". Maybe you could also leave a comment on his blog.

Also there is a new post up already :)

[link]

--
GMX Kostenlose Spiele: Einfach online spielen und Spaß haben mit Pastry Passion!

Re: Google SoC

skree...@gmail.com (Roger Pixley) — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 18:26:53 UT

Yes aware of that. Which is why I was saying how would that the current
structure. If someone opens up kate session management they will expect that
a collaboration session would be there as well. However that session can
have possibly many documents which are each a session for the framework. At

Re: Google SoC

psychobr...@gmx.net (Andreas Ramm) — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 09:34:27 UT

The main issue here is that Kate has a notion of sessions can contain a number of documents. Inside infinote each document is managed through a session so there might be a bit of confusion here. The problem is that it probably isn't all that optimal to open a new infinote session for every document inside a Kate session on startup.

Re: Google SoC

skree...@gmail.com (Roger Pixley) — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 08:16:33 UT

Ok So incase anyone is following this and not following Gregs Blog he has an
issue in his latest post
That he is musing about
[link] Anyone have any
comments?
If he is going to do a document management interface it would make sense to
have that in conjunction with the open session dialog but how would that

Re: Google SoC

skree...@gmail.com (Roger Pixley) — Thu, 10 Jul 2008 22:56:20 UT

Hi Just checking ig Greg is on this list. Been a little bit since he
updated his blog

Re: Google SoC

skree...@gmail.com (Roger Pixley) — Thu, 19 Jun 2008 05:57:55 UT

And first word turns up at
[link] :-) Nice to
have you on board Greg

Re: Kate editing event... and thoughts... part 2

mich...@daclubhouse.net (Michael Fair) — Sun, 04 May 2008 08:45:21 UT

Sorry for taking so long to reply. I didn't see the email till just now.
I envisioned that each application would understand it's own event set
and develop its own namespace in XRI. So non-text is just as easy as text,
you develop an XRI spec to describe the document along with its parts and
attributes, then you invent a series of events (described in XML) that

Re: Google SoC

psychobr...@gmx.net — Thu, 24 Apr 2008 21:48:30 UT

Just an update collaborative editing got a slot filled by Greg Haynes
for this years summer of code and I will be mentoring.