Hi,
I' wondering if there's any gain of performance in having a specific
projection different than LatLng when switching to "Earth" type. As I
pan my map, I request new features to be added to the map via a script
and it appears to be much slower while in "Earth" type.
Currently, I use LatLng coordinates to add my features. Would it be
faster if I used a specific projection ? All my data is concentrated
in Quebec, Canada btw.
I read the following article [1] about projections. It says that
"Earth" supports meter projections, but is it faster than LatLng ?
Are the coordinates reprojected on the fly when they are originally in
LatLng (making them slower to render) ?
Many thanks,
Alexandre
[1] http://earth.google.com/userguide/v4/ug_importdata.html#note
|
