There it is, 403 Forbidden! I don't have any proxy in between we are
connected via DSL to the intertubes. I know that the API gives 60x
errors, but I don't know what or who may cause this - especially
because it works if you cut&paste the same URL into your browser of
choice and get the following reply headers easily:
If I load it in Safari or Firefox I am getting an image placeholder,
if I righ-click on the image and open it in a new tab or download it,
everything works as advertised. I am stumped.
In Firefox I get: "This web site needs a different Google Maps API
key. A new key can be generated at http://code.google.com/apis/maps/."
if I take a look at the image separately. I double checked the key and
even generated a new one to http://cabchap.com, so dev.cabchap.com is
covered as well, to no avail.
On Oct 27, 3:47 pm, Marcelo <marcelo...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> If I load it in Safari or Firefox I am getting an image placeholder,
If I click the link you provided I get a map with a marker and a
circle. That means that everything should be working fine: your key
matches your domain for one thing. I'm not sure why you're specifying
20 identical markers though, but that doesn't affect the map working
or not.
If you open the image in a new tab there is no Referer data against
which the key can be checked.
It's odd. I'd expect a 403 error to indicate that you had been blocked
for some reason (perhaps hammering Google's servers during testing)
but if that were IP-based I'd expect you not to get the image at all.
Unless that check is tied in with the Referer check: if there's a
referer to check, check that and the IP address and return either a
200 OK, 610 Bad Key or 403 Forbidden.
Reverse-engineering server-side status-generation isn't easy; perhaps
Pamela will chime in. You are posting from an ordinary ISP connection,
it seems: is your testing also public or is it hidden behind a
firewall? That could trigger an IP address violation if there are too
many requests or it's been too protracted for a normal test phase.
> If I load it in Safari or Firefox I am getting an image placeholder,
> if I righ-click on the image and open it in a new tab or download it,
> everything works as advertised. I am stumped.
> In Firefox I get: "This web site needs a different Google Maps API
> key. A new key can be generated athttp://code.google.com/apis/maps/."
> if I take a look at the image separately. I double checked the key and
> even generated a new one tohttp://cabchap.com, so dev.cabchap.com is
> covered as well, to no avail.
> On Oct 27, 3:47 pm, Marcelo <marcelo...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > On Oct 27, 3:03 pm, Tom <qkl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > P.S. If this is not enough I may be able to release my current dev
> > > mess to the dev public, but only after serious cleanup ;-) Thanks!
Good evening, just to let you know, the problem seems to have
completely vanished. I guess it had to do with running the dev machine
on a dedicated port, but thats just a wild guess. At least, as you and
others have confirmed, it has not been a problem form other machines.
So, thanks for the confusion ;-)
On Oct 28, 10:59 am, Marcelo <marcelo...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> The error I see on that page is very different to what you describe.
> I get a long page with:
> -----------------------------------------------------
> NoMethodError in AsksController#index
> You have a nil object when you didn't expect it!
> You might have expected an instance of ActiveRecord::Base.
> The error occurred while evaluating nil.[]
> > If I load it in Safari or Firefox I am getting an image placeholder,
> > if I righ-click on the image and open it in a new tab or download it,
> > everything works as advertised. I am stumped.
> > In Firefox I get: "This web site needs a different Google Maps API
> > key. A new key can be generated athttp://code.google.com/apis/maps/."
> > if I take a look at the image separately. I double checked the key and
> > even generated a new one tohttp://cabchap.com, so dev.cabchap.com is
> > covered as well, to no avail.
> > On Oct 27, 3:47 pm, Marcelo <marcelo...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Oct 27, 3:03 pm, Tom <qkl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > P.S. If this is not enough I may be able to release my current dev
> > > > mess to the dev public, but only after serious cleanup ;-) Thanks!