Message from discussion
Newbie question
Received: by 10.114.121.7 with SMTP id t7mr449162wac.14.1236377353471;
Fri, 06 Mar 2009 14:09:13 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <bedd...@intient.com>
Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com (ti-out-0910.google.com [209.85.142.186])
by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id m37si706161waf.2.2009.03.06.14.09.12;
Fri, 06 Mar 2009 14:09:13 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of bedd...@intient.com designates 209.85.142.186 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.142.186;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of bedd...@intient.com designates 209.85.142.186 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=bedd...@intient.com
Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b8so414693tic.11
for <esoe-users@googlegroups.com>; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 14:09:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.110.2.2 with SMTP id 2mr4360358tib.2.1236377351737;
Fri, 06 Mar 2009 14:09:11 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <bedd...@intient.com>
Received: from ?192.168.1.2? (124-171-205-56.dyn.iinet.net.au [124.171.205.56])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u12sm2050378tia.38.2009.03.06.14.09.08
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
Fri, 06 Mar 2009 14:09:10 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <318F2800-5DFB-41AC-8584-B59E8182574B@intient.com>
From: Bradley Beddoes <bedd...@intient.com>
To: esoe-users@googlegroups.com
In-Reply-To: <a3807a28-c20c-4ed7-ab34-6b50098eb92b@r15g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [esoe-users] Newbie question
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 08:09:05 +1000
References: <a3807a28-c20c-4ed7-ab34-6b50098eb92b@r15g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
Hi,
You'll probably find that ESOE is *way* to complicated for you needs
here.
To give ourselves a plug I'd suggest our commercial product GConnect http://intient.com/products/gconnect/index.html
which is easy to install, very cost effective and supported.
regards,
Bradley
On 07/03/2009, at 3:45 AM, fatima wrote:
>
> I was looking for a solution to integrate Google Apps with our Active
> Directory, it seems i need to implement SSO if i want to use the same
> password, i am not sure if ESOE will be too complicated for this and
> is meant for more complex problems, any suggestions?
> also if this implementation would enable IMAP access to Google Apps
> using Outlook and would mobile devices also be able to use this for
> authentication?
> Any insight would be appreciated,
>
> >
Bradley Beddoes
Lead Software Architect
Intient Pty Ltd
http://www.intient.com
Twitter: @bradleybeddoes
|
