|
|
ESOE Development |
On 16/02/2009, at 8:57 AM, Shaun Mangelsdorf wrote: > As Bradley mentioned, the later the better. I wouldn't be keen on The current autoconf scripts don't check for dependencies at all, http://esoeproject.org/confluence/display/eu/Apache+SPEP+Installation...
> I can clarify a little here. We developed against a 0.9.8 version Given that there are quite a few systems that ship with 0.9.7 then
> (the specific version escapes me, but 0.9.8e sounds about right). We
> currently have a production SPEP running on Redhat 4 which uses
> 0.9.7a (not sure if this has Redhat-specific patches).. So at the
> least, it is API-compatible with that version.
> fixing any bugs that were caused by earlier versions of OpenSSL than
> 0.9.7.
it's probably worth stating that as the minimum requirement if possible.
leading to compile time errors if dependencies are not satisfied. I
would like to gradually make this more rigorous so it's easier to
compile this stuff from scratch. The difference being is that ./
configure will give you specific error messages telling you what's
wrong rather than make complaining about missing headers or symbols.
does not mention OpenSSL as a build dependency at all, should it?