Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
ESOE Development
+ new post
Home
About this group
Join this group
Message from discussion OpenSSL minimum version for saml2cpp?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Luke Daley  
View profile  
 More options Feb 16, 10:18 am
From: Luke Daley <lda...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:18:42 +1000
Local: Mon, Feb 16 2009 10:18 am
Subject: Re: [esoe-dev] Re: OpenSSL minimum version for saml2cpp?
Reply to author | Forward | Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

On 16/02/2009, at 8:57 AM, Shaun Mangelsdorf wrote:

> I can clarify a little here. We developed against a 0.9.8 version  
> (the specific version escapes me, but 0.9.8e sounds about right). We  
> currently have a production SPEP running on Redhat 4 which uses  
> 0.9.7a (not sure if this has Redhat-specific patches).. So at the  
> least, it is API-compatible with that version.

> As Bradley mentioned, the later the better. I wouldn't be keen on  
> fixing any bugs that were caused by earlier versions of OpenSSL than  
> 0.9.7.

Given that there are quite a few systems that ship with 0.9.7 then  
it's probably worth stating that as the minimum requirement if possible.

The current autoconf scripts don't check for dependencies at all,  
leading to compile time errors if dependencies are not satisfied. I  
would like to gradually make this more rigorous so it's easier to  
compile this stuff from scratch. The difference being is that ./
configure will give you specific error messages telling you what's  
wrong rather than make complaining about missing headers or symbols.

http://esoeproject.org/confluence/display/eu/Apache+SPEP+Installation...
  does not mention OpenSSL as a build dependency at all, should it?


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google