Web Images Videos Maps News Groups Gmail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion Thief 3 : more comments
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Xocyll  
View profile  
 More options Apr 26 2004, 2:52 am
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
From: Xocyll <Xoc...@kingston.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 12:52:59 -0400
Local: Mon, Apr 26 2004 2:52 am
Subject: Re: Thief 3 : more comments
Reply to author | Forward | Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
mardi <e...@mail.com> looked up from reading the entrails of the porn
spammer to utter  "The Augury is good, the signs say:

>> On Sun, 25 Apr 2004 16:45:04 +0800, "mr bernard langham"
>> <notactua...@spammenot.com> wrote:

>>>Since the New World was not colonised until well after Europe had emerged
>>>from the Dark Ages, the sight of a mediaeval knight, peasant, or otherwise
>>>inclined person speaking with a broad modern American accent is a complete
>>>anachronism and, to many people, extremely irritating.

>> Hollywood doesn't worry about historical accuracy, why should a US
>> game developer be any different.

>While true historical accuracy would be nice it can't be expected from a
>friggin video game.

Sure it can.  
Especially when it's the third installment in a series where the first
two did things properly.

>I, as an american, would rather have 'old world'
>accents but I'm not gonna bunch my proverbial panties over it.

It's the equivalent of having M-16s, M1-A1 tanks or Harriers in BF1942.

Xocyll
--
I don't particularly want you to FOAD, myself. You'll be more of
a cautionary example if you'll FO And Get Chronically, Incurably,
Painfully, Progressively, Expensively, Debilitatingly Ill. So
FOAGCIPPEDI. -- Mike Andrews responding to an idiot in asr


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google