| |
comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action |
news:mvqn80p3ppgtk28t5u8mve8kv835oscte9@4ax.com... > >> On Sun, 25 Apr 2004 16:45:04 +0800, "mr bernard langham" > >>>Since the New World was not colonised until well after Europe had > >> Hollywood doesn't worry about historical accuracy, why should a US > >While true historical accuracy would be nice it can't be expected from a > Sure it can. > >I, as an american, would rather have 'old world' > It's the equivalent of having M-16s, M1-A1 tanks or Harriers in BF1942. Err... wait a second.
> spammer to utter "The Augury is good, the signs say:
> >> <notactua...@spammenot.com> wrote:
emerged
> >>>from the Dark Ages, the sight of a mediaeval knight, peasant, or
otherwise
> >>>inclined person speaking with a broad modern American accent is a
complete
> >>>anachronism and, to many people, extremely irritating.
> >> game developer be any different.
> >friggin video game.
> Especially when it's the third installment in a series where the first
> two did things properly.
> >accents but I'm not gonna bunch my proverbial panties over it.
proximity mines, flashbombs, bionic eye replacements, wireless portable
remote cameras, steam-powered robotic guards with advanced friend-foe
identification and attack algorithms and built in trojan/spyware...