1 to change the light bulb and to post that the light bulb has been changed 14 to share similar experiences of changing light bulbs and how the light bulb could have been changed differently 7 to caution about the dangers of changing light bulbs 1 to move it to the Lighting section 2 to argue then move it to the Electricals section 7 to point out spelling/grammar errors in posts about changing light bulbs 5 to flame the spell checkers 3 to correct spelling/grammar flames 6 to argue over whether it's "lightbulb" or "light bulb" ... another 6 to condemn those 6 as stupid 2 industry professionals to inform the group that the proper term is "lamp" 15 know-it-alls who claim they were in the industry, and that "light bulb" is perfectly correct 19 to post that this forum is not about light bulbs and to please take this discussion to a lightbulb forum 11 to defend the posting to this forum saying that we all use light bulbs and therefore the posts are relevant to this forum 36 to debate which method of changing light bulbs is superior, where to buy the best light bulbs, what brand of light bulbs work best for this technique and what brands are faulty 7 to post URL's where one can see examples of different light bulbs 4 to post that the URL's were posted incorrectly and then post the corrected URL's 3 to post about links they found from the URL's that are relevant to this group which makes light bulbs relevant to this group 13 to link all posts to date, quote them in their entirety including all headers and signatures, and add "Me too" 5 to post to the group that they will no longer post because they cannot handle the light bulb controversy 4 to say "didn't we go through this already a short time ago?" 13 to say "do a Google search on light bulbs before posting questions about light bulbs" 1 forum lurker to respond to the original post 6 months from now and start it all over again.
1 to change the light bulb and to post that the light bulb has been changed 14 to share similar experiences of changing light bulbs and how the light bulb could have been changed differently 7 to caution about the dangers of changing light bulbs 1 to move it to the Lighting section 2 to argue then move it to the Electricals section 7 to point out spelling/grammar errors in posts about changing light bulbs 5 to flame the spell checkers 3 to correct spelling/grammar flames 6 to argue over whether it's "lightbulb" or "light bulb" ... another 6 to condemn those 6 as stupid 2 industry professionals to inform the group that the proper term is "lamp" 15 know-it-alls who claim they were in the industry, and that "light bulb" is perfectly correct 19 to post that this forum is not about light bulbs and to please take this discussion to a lightbulb forum 11 to defend the posting to this forum saying that we all use light bulbs and therefore the posts are relevant to this forum 36 to debate which method of changing light bulbs is superior, where to buy the best light bulbs, what brand of light bulbs work best for this technique and what brands are faulty 7 to post URL's where one can see examples of different light bulbs 4 to post that the URL's were posted incorrectly and then post the corrected URL's 3 to post about links they found from the URL's that are relevant to this group which makes light bulbs relevant to this group 13 to link all posts to date, quote them in their entirety including all headers and signatures, and add "Me too" 5 to post to the group that they will no longer post because they cannot handle the light bulb controversy 4 to say "didn't we go through this already a short time ago?" 13 to say "do a Google search on light bulbs before posting questions about light bulbs" 1 forum lurker to respond to the original post 6 months from now and start it all over again.
Shawk wrote: > Jellybean wrote: >> Shawk wrote: >>> 1 to change the light bulb and to post that the light bulb has been >>> changed
>> Go away troll.
> New here are we?
It's just the same little tw@t that regularly changes his name to try and avoid killfiles. Fortunately he's rather easy to spot as you just look for posts that look as though they've come from a not very bright 10 year old ...
>Shawk wrote: >> Jellybean wrote: >>> Shawk wrote: >>>> 1 to change the light bulb and to post that the light bulb has been >>>> changed
>>> Go away troll.
>> New here are we?
>It's just the same little tw@t that regularly changes his name to try >and avoid killfiles. Fortunately he's rather easy to spot as you just >look for posts that look as though they've come from a not very bright >10 year old ...
Shit, that describes at least a dozen or more asshats here in .action! <BFG>
> Nope, and not only are you a troll but you are a double posting troll so > that makes you a spammer too.
Dude you need to STFU and go back to playing with your Playdough. Shawk has been around for a very long time. And how long have you been posting on this group? Christ Usenet is dying and we still have SOB's like you calling people trolls. This group used to get 250 or more posts a DAY. Now if we get 10 we're having a good day.
> Stop double-post. It came through the first time.
OMG Shawk made a mistake and we have a Usenet cop come out of the woodwork. What are you going to say, he's wasting precious bandwidth! Go bust some old lady for Jaywalking. That will make you feel like a big man.
>> Stop double-post. It came through the first time.
> OMG Shawk made a mistake and we have a Usenet cop come out of the > woodwork. What are you going to say, he's wasting precious bandwidth! > Go bust some old lady for Jaywalking. That will make you feel like a big > man.
Some of us have been on Usenet since the dawn on man when one payed per minute charges to access it. There is no reason to act recklessly just because you no longer are. Besides, after deducting what's used up by the U-, the me- and the XXX-tubes, there is precious little bandwidth left for important things like bickering on Usenet. Stop it or i'll have you removed from Internet.
-- Nah-ah. I'm staying out of this. ... Now, here's my opinion.
Please followup in the newsgroup. E-mail address is invalid due to spam-control.
>> Addendum) >> 1 making a double-posting. >> At least 1 responding complaining about it.
> Lol. Just installed Win7 and reinstalled TBird and the first post > didn't seem to send. Apols.
He! I was speculating that, because of the content, it was done on purpose.
Addendum #2) Arguments back and forth over who has a right to post complaints depending on if they are regulars in the group or not, and how long the various parties have been on Usenet.
-- Nah-ah. I'm staying out of this. ... Now, here's my opinion.
Please followup in the newsgroup. E-mail address is invalid due to spam-control.
<l...@sig.bcause.this.is.invalid> wrote: > Some of us have been on Usenet since the dawn on man when >one payed per minute charges to access it. There is no reason to >act recklessly just because you no longer are. > Besides, after deducting what's used up by the U-, the me- >and the XXX-tubes, there is precious little bandwidth left for >important things like bickering on Usenet. Stop it or i'll have >you removed from Internet.
Yea, I heard within 2 years the entire original internet bandwidth will be used up. Replacing it will require two strong men, and and it costs nearly $40 for the new band from Home Depot.
I don't want that on my conscience, so you won't be hearing any bullshit from me.
JLC wrote: > OMG Shawk made a mistake and we have a Usenet cop come out of the > woodwork. What are you going to say, he's wasting precious bandwidth! > Go bust some old lady for Jaywalking. That will make you feel like a big > man.
> JLC
The 'j' in jaywalking is not capitalized unless it is the beginning of a sentence, moron.
>> OMG Shawk made a mistake and we have a Usenet cop come out of the >> woodwork. What are you going to say, he's wasting precious bandwidth! >> Go bust some old lady for Jaywalking. That will make you feel like a >> big man.
>> JLC
> The 'j' in jaywalking is not capitalized unless it is the beginning of a > sentence, moron.
Man you are bring up some old ,old memories from the good old days when Usenet was for the cool kids at collage, and there was always some guys that thought that they had to enforce the rules because they where such super nerds. I remember when AOL and Web TV users started posting. We all thought it was the end of Usenet. We had no idea at the time a little known program called "Mosaic" which could be used to look at the "World Wide Web", would someday doom Usenet. Now Usenet is but but a faint shadow of what it once was. JLC
|
