|
|
comp.sys.apple2 |
In article <231.2893F...@resq.fidonet.org> Dennis.McClain-Furman...@resq.fidonet.org (Dennis McClain-Furmanski) writes: >First thing to note is: much depends on how the word "Mac"
I sure hope MacWorld explained this. Otherwise they might
>is placed in the text file. . . . From this experience,
>I would like to know how "Mac" was formated in the original
>tests done by MacWorld!
just as well not have explained what their benchmarks were
at all. If anybody read the article, did they mention this?
> Next, I'll agree with #2 of Robert's Seems to me that the GUI shouldn't have much to do with it.
>conclusions. Just imagine what a Mac IIfx could be without
>that worthless GUI!!!!!!
All the searching and replacement is going on in memory, not
on the screen. Also, I don't think the Mac GUI is worthless;
It's easy to use, and it's a hell of a lot better than
Microsoft Windows.
> Just imagine what the IIgs would You don't have to use it if you don't like it (unlike Macintosh).
>be without emulating that same worthless GUI.
There are plenty of text-based programs and program launchers
available. You're welcome to use them if you want.
\ "It's not how high you are, / Disclaimer:
Ben Rudiak-Gould \ it's Hi, how are you?" / Opinions are mine...
rud...@garnet.berkeley.edu \ -- Mike Sugarbaker / Mine... ALL MINE!!!!
\_______________________/ HA HA HAAA HAAAAAA!!