<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>comp.os.linux.development.system Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.os.linux.development.system</link>
  <description>Linux kernels, device drivers, modules.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>1. Muhammad (peace be upon him) as a Trustworthy (and Honest).</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.os.linux.development.system/browse_thread/thread/a42d52ac3b119bd7/b3581baac8271d9f?show_docid=b3581baac8271d9f</link>
  <description>
  1. Muhammad (peace be upon him) as a Trustworthy (and Honest). &lt;br&gt; From Muhammad&#39;s Sayings: &lt;br&gt; -Abu Huraira (may Allah be pleased with him) reported: The messenger &lt;br&gt; of Allah (PBUH) said: &amp;quot;The signs of a hypocrite are three: 1. Whenever &lt;br&gt; he speaks, he tells a lie. 2. Whenever he promises, he always breaks &lt;br&gt; it (his promise). 3. If you trust him, he proves to be dishonest. (If
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.os.linux.development.system/browse_thread/thread/a42d52ac3b119bd7/b3581baac8271d9f?show_docid=b3581baac8271d9f</guid>
  <author>
  adomat...@gmail.com
  (.. أبو علي..)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:03:53 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: How can I thoroughly debug these types of errors?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.os.linux.development.system/browse_thread/thread/7d91a94f42c9b671/2c42b610b9123a9e?show_docid=2c42b610b9123a9e</link>
  <description>
  2.6.19 is... ancient system? I&#39;m running latest Java on older than &lt;br&gt; that! &lt;br&gt; I&#39;ve got a kernel 2.6.16 / libc 2.3.6 running the latest &lt;br&gt; Java 1.6: &lt;br&gt; ... $ uname -a &lt;br&gt; Linux ... 2.6.16.33 #1 SMP Fri Mar 30 04:13:58 BST 2007 i686 GNU/Linux &lt;br&gt; ... $ java -version &lt;br&gt; java version &amp;quot;1.6.0_17&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_17-b04)
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.os.linux.development.system/browse_thread/thread/7d91a94f42c9b671/2c42b610b9123a9e?show_docid=2c42b610b9123a9e</guid>
  <author>
  terdfop...@gmail.com
  (Teraposa Lunodas)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:27:14 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: howto apply 2.6.x.y on 2.6.x</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.os.linux.development.system/browse_thread/thread/f6f336318cece80e/45f074d19dbedd5c?show_docid=45f074d19dbedd5c</link>
  <description>
  Am 19.11.2009 09:15 schrieb lovecreatesbea...@gmai1.c0m: &lt;br&gt; The patch-kernel script is not the optimal tool for that. &lt;br&gt; You&#39;d normally just do: &lt;br&gt; bzcat patch-2.6.26.1.bz2 | ( cd linux-2.6.26 ; patch -p1 ) &lt;br&gt; If you absolutely want to do it with patch-kernel, have a &lt;br&gt; look at the usage text at the beginning of the script.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.os.linux.development.system/browse_thread/thread/f6f336318cece80e/45f074d19dbedd5c?show_docid=45f074d19dbedd5c</guid>
  <author>
  ts-usenet0...@pxnet.com
  (Tilman Schmidt)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:45:29 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: gmake upgrade fails - please suggest remedy</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.os.linux.development.system/browse_thread/thread/4e93c81cba2a2462/5179eb97c39c66f2?show_docid=5179eb97c39c66f2</link>
  <description>
  There are two basic possibilites here: &lt;br&gt; 1. The shell tries to reduce the time needed to start a &lt;br&gt; command by caching the paths of &#39;recently invoked&#39; commands in &lt;br&gt; order to avoid the need to do a path search everytime. It is &lt;br&gt; conceivable that you shell is running the old command because &lt;br&gt; the location is still cached. This can be checked with &#39;hash&#39;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.os.linux.development.system/browse_thread/thread/4e93c81cba2a2462/5179eb97c39c66f2?show_docid=5179eb97c39c66f2</guid>
  <author>
  rweiku...@mssgmbh.com
  (Rainer Weikusat)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:12:29 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: gmake upgrade fails - please suggest remedy</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.os.linux.development.system/browse_thread/thread/4e93c81cba2a2462/66e445a8c0338bee?show_docid=66e445a8c0338bee</link>
  <description>
  You need to run the version of gmake you installed, not the one from &lt;br&gt; before. &lt;br&gt; DS
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.os.linux.development.system/browse_thread/thread/4e93c81cba2a2462/66e445a8c0338bee?show_docid=66e445a8c0338bee</guid>
  <author>
  dav...@webmaster.com
  (David Schwartz)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:56:50 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>gmake upgrade fails - please suggest remedy</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.os.linux.development.system/browse_thread/thread/4e93c81cba2a2462/0589d4cec2bad3a8?show_docid=0589d4cec2bad3a8</link>
  <description>
  Could some Linux guru please help ? I am running RedHat 2.6.9-34.EL. I &lt;br&gt; am trying to build OpenWrt Kamikaze-8.09 on my machine. Whwn I tried &lt;br&gt; compiling it, I got an error message that I needed gmake 8.1 or above. &lt;br&gt; I downloaded the gzip file, unzipped and went through the steps of ./ &lt;br&gt; configure, make, make check and make install and everything worked
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.os.linux.development.system/browse_thread/thread/4e93c81cba2a2462/0589d4cec2bad3a8?show_docid=0589d4cec2bad3a8</guid>
  <author>
  dakup...@gmail.com
  (Daku)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:38:16 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: where to get kernel to build a custom one</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.os.linux.development.system/browse_thread/thread/b0f861325bfb33a4/fa0e6ce8662a9bf8?show_docid=fa0e6ce8662a9bf8</link>
  <description>
  I would suggest that you download the kernel from Debian. You could simply &lt;br&gt; use &#39;apt-get source linux-image-...&#39; to get the sources. Build those, &lt;br&gt; install the resulting packages and reboot. If it works, you can start your &lt;br&gt; modifications. You can also download the sources from upstream, but in &lt;br&gt; general I would prefer going with the flow of Debian. If you think about
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.os.linux.development.system/browse_thread/thread/b0f861325bfb33a4/fa0e6ce8662a9bf8?show_docid=fa0e6ce8662a9bf8</guid>
  <author>
  dooms...@knuut.de
  (Ulrich Eckhardt)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:49:26 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: where to get kernel to build a custom one</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.os.linux.development.system/browse_thread/thread/b0f861325bfb33a4/344ace1287cd3455?show_docid=344ace1287cd3455</link>
  <description>
  [...] &lt;br&gt; My suggestion would be to stay close behind the kernel.org releases, &lt;br&gt; eg use the highest-numbered minor version of the second most recent &lt;br&gt; kernel. This would be 2.6.31.x now. That&#39;s a conservative approach &lt;br&gt; which has worked mostly well for me for some years. &lt;br&gt; I have encountered exactly two issues so far: A 2.6 release from some
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.os.linux.development.system/browse_thread/thread/b0f861325bfb33a4/344ace1287cd3455?show_docid=344ace1287cd3455</guid>
  <author>
  rweiku...@mssgmbh.com
  (Rainer Weikusat)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:33:36 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: where to get kernel to build a custom one</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.os.linux.development.system/browse_thread/thread/b0f861325bfb33a4/07a448d00de08204?show_docid=07a448d00de08204</link>
  <description>
  Thaks for reply. &lt;br&gt; Sorry for my awful English. &lt;br&gt; Suppose I&#39;m not submitting code, modules or drivers to linux kernel &lt;br&gt; right now (hope I will do it soon), and just going to make minor &lt;br&gt; changes in vfs (ie. some ../fs/*.c) for my own use. &lt;br&gt; I&#39;m using Debian Lenny (503), and `uname -r` is 2.6.26-2-686. Do I &lt;br&gt; download a copy of kernel source from debian.org which produced /
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.os.linux.development.system/browse_thread/thread/b0f861325bfb33a4/07a448d00de08204?show_docid=07a448d00de08204</guid>
  <author>
  lovecreatesbea...@gmail.com
  (lovecreatesbeauty@gmai1.c0m)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:41:50 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: where to get kernel to build a custom one</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.os.linux.development.system/browse_thread/thread/b0f861325bfb33a4/9445ce813a6a3f6d?show_docid=9445ce813a6a3f6d</link>
  <description>
  If you&#39;re afraid of breaking your system, try one that is close to what you &lt;br&gt; are currently running. That way, chances are lower that things suddenly stop &lt;br&gt; working. &lt;br&gt; This sentence doesn&#39;t parse here. Guessing what you mean, I can say that the &lt;br&gt; one from kernel.org will probably not have changes that were made to the
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.os.linux.development.system/browse_thread/thread/b0f861325bfb33a4/9445ce813a6a3f6d?show_docid=9445ce813a6a3f6d</guid>
  <author>
  dooms...@knuut.de
  (Ulrich Eckhardt)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 07:54:34 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>where to get kernel to build a custom one</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.os.linux.development.system/browse_thread/thread/b0f861325bfb33a4/2d18463e35524fc9?show_docid=2d18463e35524fc9</link>
  <description>
  From kernel.org, or the one of the distribution (manufacturer) which &lt;br&gt; I&#39;m currently using? If the one from kernel.org, will the &lt;br&gt; modifications to kernel source by by the distro lose and introduce &lt;br&gt; problems or bugs ever fixed by the distro? &lt;br&gt; Debian shows in his handbook[1] in sec4.4 and 4.5 that both are ok.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.os.linux.development.system/browse_thread/thread/b0f861325bfb33a4/2d18463e35524fc9?show_docid=2d18463e35524fc9</guid>
  <author>
  lovecreatesbea...@gmail.com
  (lovecreatesbeauty@gmai1.c0m)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 01:51:09 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: W^X in Linux?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.os.linux.development.system/browse_thread/thread/8640c0face7c8e61/9adffeb0eb5b4495?show_docid=9adffeb0eb5b4495</link>
  <description>
  On Nov 9, 8:49 am, &amp;quot;Non scrivetemi&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; Linux has a similar feature, and does it more efficiently. Remember, &lt;br&gt; the main reason Linus wrote Linux was because he wanted to play with &lt;br&gt; the MMU. Linux also has very fast context switches which makes it &lt;br&gt; much easier to use the MMU for W^X protection and beyond.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.os.linux.development.system/browse_thread/thread/8640c0face7c8e61/9adffeb0eb5b4495?show_docid=9adffeb0eb5b4495</guid>
  <author>
  rex.ball...@gmail.com
  (Rex Ballard)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:03:57 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: howto apply 2.6.x.y on 2.6.x</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.os.linux.development.system/browse_thread/thread/f6f336318cece80e/8c8e38c6d23f27e6?show_docid=8c8e38c6d23f27e6</link>
  <description>
  On Nov 19, 4:21 pm, &amp;quot;lovecreatesbea...@gmai1.c0m&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; I tried it, and it works. But don&#39;t know why patch-kernel can&#39;t do the &lt;br&gt; patching. &lt;br&gt; $ pwd &lt;br&gt; /home/jhl/working/tmp/linux-2. 6.26 &lt;br&gt; $ bzip2 -dc ../patch-2.6.26.1.bz2 | patch -p1 &lt;br&gt; .. &lt;br&gt; $ bzip2 -dc ../patch-2.6.26.1.bz2 | patch -p1 -R &lt;br&gt; .. &lt;br&gt; $
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.os.linux.development.system/browse_thread/thread/f6f336318cece80e/8c8e38c6d23f27e6?show_docid=8c8e38c6d23f27e6</guid>
  <author>
  lovecreatesbea...@gmail.com
  (lovecreatesbeauty@gmai1.c0m)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:49:50 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: howto apply 2.6.x.y on 2.6.x</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.os.linux.development.system/browse_thread/thread/f6f336318cece80e/aff29eb8dd804982?show_docid=aff29eb8dd804982</link>
  <description>
  On Nov 19, 4:15 pm, &amp;quot;lovecreatesbea...@gmai1.c0m&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; can it be done by patch command on command line other than `patch- &lt;br&gt; kernel&#39;. linux-2.6.26/README says patch `2.6.x.y&#39; can be directly &lt;br&gt; applied to kernel `2.6.x&#39;: &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot; Unlike patches for the 2.6.x kernels, patches for the 2.6.x.y &lt;br&gt; kernels &lt;br&gt; (also known as the -stable kernels) are not incremental but instead
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.os.linux.development.system/browse_thread/thread/f6f336318cece80e/aff29eb8dd804982?show_docid=aff29eb8dd804982</guid>
  <author>
  lovecreatesbea...@gmail.com
  (lovecreatesbeauty@gmai1.c0m)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:21:18 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>howto apply 2.6.x.y on 2.6.x</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.os.linux.development.system/browse_thread/thread/f6f336318cece80e/b65dd1e07b904a70?show_docid=b65dd1e07b904a70</link>
  <description>
  can I apply patch-2.6.26.1.bz2 on kernel linux-2.6.26? I failed to do &lt;br&gt; so with patch-kernel utility. &lt;br&gt; $ ls &lt;br&gt; linux-2.6.26 patch-2.6.26.1 patch-2.6.26.1.bz2 &lt;br&gt; $ linux-2.6.26/scripts/patch-ker nel linux-2.6.26 patch-2.6.26.1 &lt;br&gt; Current kernel version is 2.6.26 ( Rotary Wombat) &lt;br&gt; cannot find patch file: patch-2.6.27
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.os.linux.development.system/browse_thread/thread/f6f336318cece80e/b65dd1e07b904a70?show_docid=b65dd1e07b904a70</guid>
  <author>
  lovecreatesbea...@gmail.com
  (lovecreatesbeauty@gmai1.c0m)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:15:39 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
