Go to Google Groups Home    comp.lang.python
Re: 0 == False but [] != False?

Donn Cave <d...@u.washington.edu>

In article <cd2dnRy_aJMF78HbnZ2dnUVZ_t7in...@speakeasy.net>,
 Erik Max Francis <m...@alcyone.com> wrote:

> Donn Cave wrote:

> > Not that it is of no historical interest to review all these
> > reasonable arguments, but allow me to restore the context quote
> > from my follow-up:

> If the counterpoints are of no historical interest, then the original
> point must be of no historical interest either, since it was not widely
> granted as true.

"Not that it is of no historical interest" may have been too
hard to follow, my apologies.  I should have said "It may be of
historical interest ...".  After that, you lost me, but I guess
I'm not going to worry about it.

   Donn Cave, d...@u.washington.edu