Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Microsoft research on code quality
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  6 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Aahz  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 8:15 am
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
From: a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz)
Date: 6 Nov 2009 13:15:32 -0800
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 8:15 am
Subject: Microsoft research on code quality
http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/news/features/nagappan-100609.aspx
--
Aahz (a...@pythoncraft.com)           <*>         http://www.pythoncraft.com/

[on old computer technologies and programmers]  "Fancy tail fins on a
brand new '59 Cadillac didn't mean throwing out a whole generation of
mechanics who started with model As."  --Andrew Dalke


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
exar...@twistedmatrix.com  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 8:47 am
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
From: exar...@twistedmatrix.com
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 21:47:18 -0000
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 8:47 am
Subject: Re: Microsoft research on code quality
On 09:15 pm, a...@pythoncraft.com wrote:

Thanks for passing on the link.  It's really encouraging to see people
starting to do empirical research in this area.

Jean-Paul


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Bruno Desthuilliers  
View profile  
 More options Nov 8, 4:43 am
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
From: Bruno Desthuilliers <bdesth.quelquech...@free.quelquepart.fr>
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 18:43:35 +0100
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 4:43 am
Subject: Re: Microsoft research on code quality
Aahz a écrit :

An interesting reading. Thanks for the link.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Mensanator  
View profile  
 More options Nov 8, 10:22 am
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
From: Mensanator <mensana...@aol.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 15:22:26 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 10:22 am
Subject: Re: Microsoft research on code quality
On Nov 6, 3:15 pm, a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) wrote:

> http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/news/features/nagappan-100609.aspx
> --
> Aahz (a...@pythoncraft.com)           <*>        http://www.pythoncraft.com/

> [on old computer technologies and programmers]  "Fancy tail fins on a
> brand new '59 Cadillac didn't mean throwing out a whole generation of
> mechanics who started with model As."  --Andrew Dalke

Microsoft has more to answer for for the fuckups they install
deliberately than for the bugs that get in accidentally.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Mark Leander  
View profile  
 More options Nov 11, 11:52 pm
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
From: Mark Leander <mark.lean...@topicbranch.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 04:52:11 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Nov 11 2009 11:52 pm
Subject: Re: Microsoft research on code quality

Thanks for the link! Hope he next takes on verifying that less code
implies less bugs when
other factors are constant, thus proving that Python is better than C
and Java :-).

Mark


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
r  
View profile  
 More options Nov 12, 12:11 am
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
From: r <rt8...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 05:11:28 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs, Nov 12 2009 12:11 am
Subject: Re: Microsoft research on code quality
On Nov 7, 5:22 pm, Mensanator <mensana...@aol.com> wrote:

> Microsoft has more to answer for for the fuckups they install
> deliberately than for the bugs that get in accidentally.

Here!, Here! Very well put Mensanator!

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google