Message from discussion
Animator Pro vs. Studio 3D
Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!boulder!news.coop.net!news.den.mmc.com!iplmail.orl.mmc.com!CCMail.orl.mmc.com!T_Lee_Kidwell
From: T_Lee_Kidw...@CCMail.orl.mmc.com (T. Lee Kidwell)
Newsgroups: comp.graphics.animation
Subject: Re: Animator Pro vs. Studio 3D
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 1994 10:17:13
Organization: IPL InterNetNews site
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <T_Lee_Kidwell.35.000A49C1@CCMail.orl.mmc.com>
References: <CwCGIJ.5q5@lexmark.com> <CwJ2yn.Dpz@cix.compulink.co.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 141.240.34.122
X-Newsreader: Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev A]
In article <CwJ2yn....@cix.compulink.co.uk> gl...@cix.compulink.co.uk ("Glyn Williams") writes:
>From: gl...@cix.compulink.co.uk ("Glyn Williams")
>Subject: Re: Animator Pro vs. Studio 3D
>Date: Thu, 22 Sep 1994 11:08:46 GMT
>> What are the major differences between the two Autodesk
>> programs, "Animator Pro" and "3D Studio"?
>> > Thanks,
>> > Jim
>> jmcc...@lexmark.com
>Answer: One d
>Animator Pro is a deeply weak 2D painting/animation package.
>3DS is a 3D rendering package.
>Glyn Williams
Glyn, I would agree with your assessment that 3D Studio is a 3D rendering
package, but why would you say Animator Pro is "deeply weak"?