Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion Animator Pro vs. Studio 3D
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
T. Lee Kidwell  
View profile  
 More options Sep 23 1994, 10:58 am
Newsgroups: comp.graphics.animation
From: T_Lee_Kidw...@CCMail.orl.mmc.com (T. Lee Kidwell)
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 1994 10:17:13
Local: Fri, Sep 23 1994 12:17 am
Subject: Re: Animator Pro vs. Studio 3D

In article <CwJ2yn....@cix.compulink.co.uk> gl...@cix.compulink.co.uk ("Glyn Williams") writes:
>From: gl...@cix.compulink.co.uk ("Glyn Williams")
>Subject: Re: Animator Pro vs. Studio 3D
>Date: Thu, 22 Sep 1994 11:08:46 GMT
>> What are the major differences between the two Autodesk
>> programs, "Animator Pro" and "3D Studio"?
>> > Thanks,
>> > Jim
>> jmcc...@lexmark.com
>Answer: One d
>Animator Pro is a deeply weak 2D painting/animation package.
>3DS is a 3D rendering package.
>Glyn Williams

Glyn, I would agree with your assessment that 3D Studio is a 3D rendering
package, but why would you say Animator Pro is "deeply weak"?

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google