<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>comp.dcom.telecom Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.dcom.telecom</link>
  <description>Telecommunications digest. (Moderated)</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Google Voice and Reciprocal Compensation on NPR [Telecom]</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.dcom.telecom/browse_thread/thread/33c9344eeecb82d2/33e31ded0e6c6d81?show_docid=33e31ded0e6c6d81</link>
  <description>
  Is that different from the kind of surcharge discussed here? &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://groups.google.com/group/comp.dcom.telecom/browse_thread/thread/a2847c430f429be9/cb14bd1552e9ff54&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; Dan Lanciani &lt;br&gt; ddl@danlan.*com
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.dcom.telecom/browse_thread/thread/33c9344eeecb82d2/33e31ded0e6c6d81?show_docid=33e31ded0e6c6d81</guid>
  <author>
  d...@danlan.com
  (Dan Lanciani)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 21:50:22 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Caller ID Device [Telecom]</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.dcom.telecom/browse_thread/thread/97e47df787b403e6/47f8e837bee9d28a?show_docid=47f8e837bee9d28a</link>
  <description>
  I did find the site.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.dcom.telecom/browse_thread/thread/97e47df787b403e6/47f8e837bee9d28a?show_docid=47f8e837bee9d28a</guid>
  <author>
  diespamm...@killspammers.com
  (Steven)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 20:24:46 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Caller ID Device [Telecom]</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.dcom.telecom/browse_thread/thread/97e47df787b403e6/17e8db849b249034?show_docid=17e8db849b249034</link>
  <description>
  If you add your own voice modem and windows computer a program called &lt;br&gt; Phone Tray Free will do the job.. It will handle multiple lines and &lt;br&gt; you can customize the response based on CID number or name. I use it &lt;br&gt; from a home file server that is always on, very little overhead.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.dcom.telecom/browse_thread/thread/97e47df787b403e6/17e8db849b249034?show_docid=17e8db849b249034</guid>
  <author>
  n2...@hotmail.com
  (Steve Stone)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 18:04:57 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Shrinking directories [Telecom]</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.dcom.telecom/browse_thread/thread/002b7de1e9b0218b/f854420bd4ea6227?show_docid=f854420bd4ea6227</link>
  <description>
  When I moved to my first home in a small city (pop 30,000) we received a &lt;br&gt; single phone book that only covered that non baby bell territory. I &lt;br&gt; think at that time it was called Continental Telephone Co. of Upper New &lt;br&gt; York. You were SOL if you needed to look up a number in a county &lt;br&gt; location covered by one of 3 other local phone companies. Today we
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.dcom.telecom/browse_thread/thread/002b7de1e9b0218b/f854420bd4ea6227?show_docid=f854420bd4ea6227</guid>
  <author>
  n2...@hotmail.com
  (Steve Stone)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 18:01:23 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Overlay area code 872 to open, Chicago [Telecom]</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.dcom.telecom/browse_thread/thread/73a1082d7ec6fab6/10eb19b92cb4cbdf?show_docid=10eb19b92cb4cbdf</link>
  <description>
  I didn&#39;t notice that Comcast made it possible to reach the test number &lt;br&gt; till the day before the mandatory dial date. &lt;br&gt; Whoa! Comcast isn&#39;t making us dial the 1 dialing prefix! Actually, it &lt;br&gt; never occurred to me to try to FNPA dialing without the dialing prefix &lt;br&gt; before.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.dcom.telecom/browse_thread/thread/73a1082d7ec6fab6/10eb19b92cb4cbdf?show_docid=10eb19b92cb4cbdf</guid>
  <author>
  a...@chinet.com
  (Adam H. Kerman)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 06:46:42 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Ported number database (was: Area code 533 assigned for personal communications services) [Telecom]</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.dcom.telecom/browse_thread/thread/ddc4887d9b5a95be/00d674ed6aa46fd8?show_docid=00d674ed6aa46fd8</link>
  <description>
  So, is there a publicly accessible database of ported numbers? I know &lt;br&gt; the unsolicited call centers are required to purge their calling lists &lt;br&gt; of known numbers ported to cell phones, but has anyone made the &lt;br&gt; database available for single lookups? &lt;br&gt; And does the database include numbers ported from cell phone to land
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.dcom.telecom/browse_thread/thread/ddc4887d9b5a95be/00d674ed6aa46fd8?show_docid=00d674ed6aa46fd8</guid>
  <author>
  a...@chinet.com
  (Adam H. Kerman)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 06:37:57 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Google Voice and Reciprocal Compensation on NPR [Telecom]</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.dcom.telecom/browse_thread/thread/33c9344eeecb82d2/e854bf6ad525560d?show_docid=e854bf6ad525560d</link>
  <description>
  On Nov 2, 8:44 am, &amp;quot;har...@hallikainen.com&amp;quot; &amp;lt;har...@hallikainen.com&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; This isn&#39;t reciprocal compensation, which by definition is the &lt;br&gt; cost-based rate paid by local exchange carriers to each other for &lt;br&gt; local calls. It&#39;s the older, costlier Switched Access system, by &lt;br&gt; which long distance carriers pay local carriers higher-than-cost
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.dcom.telecom/browse_thread/thread/33c9344eeecb82d2/e854bf6ad525560d?show_docid=e854bf6ad525560d</guid>
  <author>
  fgoldstein.seesigspamb...@wn2.wn.net
  (Fred Goldstein)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 05:02:16 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Classic phone booth still in service [Telecom]</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.dcom.telecom/browse_thread/thread/acd643378e0c051e/939dedbf175dd87c?show_docid=939dedbf175dd87c</link>
  <description>
  Actually, there&#39;s a whole row of phone booths with ledge seats and &lt;br&gt; bi-fold doors in the HUB (Husky Union Building) at the University of &lt;br&gt; Washington in Seattle. Didn&#39;t check but it used to be a requirement &lt;br&gt; of pay phones in Washington Qwest territory that directories would be &lt;br&gt; provided (not surprising since DA from coin phones has always cost
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.dcom.telecom/browse_thread/thread/acd643378e0c051e/939dedbf175dd87c?show_docid=939dedbf175dd87c</guid>
  <author>
  joeofseat...@yahoo.com
  (Joseph Singer)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 21:59:22 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Area code 533 assigned for personal communications services [Telecom]</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.dcom.telecom/browse_thread/thread/ddc4887d9b5a95be/0cbe6e70cbc9f029?show_docid=0cbe6e70cbc9f029</link>
  <description>
  Actually, there *is* a way to tell if a number is a mobile number or a &lt;br&gt; regular number. Go to &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;https://www.wirelessamberalerts.org/index.jsp&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; and input a 10-digit number. The result will either give the name of &lt;br&gt; the mobile operating company or you&#39;ll get an error message that the &lt;br&gt; number you have input is not a wireless number.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.dcom.telecom/browse_thread/thread/ddc4887d9b5a95be/0cbe6e70cbc9f029?show_docid=0cbe6e70cbc9f029</guid>
  <author>
  joeofseat...@yahoo.com
  (Joseph Singer)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 21:53:40 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Google Voice and Reciprocal Compensation on NPR [Telecom]</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.dcom.telecom/browse_thread/thread/33c9344eeecb82d2/e5c841abe99a3b15?show_docid=e5c841abe99a3b15</link>
  <description>
  In message &lt;br&gt; &amp;lt;6a3e9b05-e67c-4291-aec8-efe3c 7266...@k19g2000yqc.googlegrou ps.com&amp;gt;, &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.Queensbridge.us&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &amp;lt;NOTva...@Queensbridge.us&amp;gt; writes &lt;br&gt; That would imply Google voice implemented a rating/billing &lt;br&gt; system. Given that a very significant proportion (50%?) of a &lt;br&gt; conventional telco&#39;s operating costs are associated with call data
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.dcom.telecom/browse_thread/thread/33c9344eeecb82d2/e5c841abe99a3b15?show_docid=e5c841abe99a3b15</guid>
  <author>
  pc...@wisty.plus.com
  (Peter R Cook)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:59:52 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Google Voice and Reciprocal Compensation on NPR [Telecom]</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.dcom.telecom/browse_thread/thread/33c9344eeecb82d2/2100ded493224386?show_docid=2100ded493224386</link>
  <description>
  On Nov 2, 8:44 am, &amp;quot;har...@hallikainen.com&amp;quot; &amp;lt;har...@hallikainen.com&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; Why doesn&#39;t Google Voice charge a toll to those changes? &lt;br&gt; Even if it determined that they are a phone company, there is no law &lt;br&gt; that says that free service has to be given to all customers for all &lt;br&gt; calls.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.dcom.telecom/browse_thread/thread/33c9344eeecb82d2/2100ded493224386?show_docid=2100ded493224386</guid>
  <author>
  notva...@queensbridge.us
  (www.Queensbridge.us)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 04:01:12 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Caller ID Device [Telecom]</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.dcom.telecom/browse_thread/thread/97e47df787b403e6/d93295ffdff55706?show_docid=d93295ffdff55706</link>
  <description>
  A while back I asked about a device that allows blocking numbers using &lt;br&gt; CID, much like the old Radio Shack CID did. I lost the site address.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.dcom.telecom/browse_thread/thread/97e47df787b403e6/d93295ffdff55706?show_docid=d93295ffdff55706</guid>
  <author>
  diespamm...@killspammers.com
  (Steven)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 01:15:30 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: White Pages may fall victim of technology [Telecom]</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.dcom.telecom/browse_thread/thread/b633ae0edf0d005d/748fec14cb21f889?show_docid=748fec14cb21f889</link>
  <description>
  Thanks. I didn&#39;t know that SBC had taken over Ameritech.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.dcom.telecom/browse_thread/thread/b633ae0edf0d005d/748fec14cb21f889?show_docid=748fec14cb21f889</guid>
  <author>
  s...@coldmail.com
  (Sam Spade)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:11:34 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: White Pages may fall victim of technology [Telecom]</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.dcom.telecom/browse_thread/thread/b633ae0edf0d005d/e28e4ed0ade2648f?show_docid=e28e4ed0ade2648f</link>
  <description>
  Can you please be more specific with your question: ILEC or CLEC? &lt;br&gt; Post-divestiture AT&amp;amp;T or SBC-renamed-AT&amp;amp;T? &lt;br&gt; Illinois Bell/Ameritech/SBC was the ILEC in nearly all of Chicago and &lt;br&gt; suburbs and major downstate cities like Rockford, Springfield, some of the &lt;br&gt; Illinois side of the Quad Cities, and a lot of the Illinois side of the
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.dcom.telecom/browse_thread/thread/b633ae0edf0d005d/e28e4ed0ade2648f?show_docid=e28e4ed0ade2648f</guid>
  <author>
  a...@chinet.com
  (Adam H. Kerman)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 05:13:55 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Western Union&#39;s satellite loss [Telecom]</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.dcom.telecom/browse_thread/thread/45672d02cac26fb1/02e219dbbcb8ee09?show_docid=02e219dbbcb8ee09</link>
  <description>
  I worked for WU 30 years in Kansas City. I removed the last morse &lt;br&gt; station in 1968.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.dcom.telecom/browse_thread/thread/45672d02cac26fb1/02e219dbbcb8ee09?show_docid=02e219dbbcb8ee09</guid>
  <author>
  ben...@gmail.remove_nospam.com
  (benfmo)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:14:46 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
