Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
number exhaustion and portability [Telecom]
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  Messages 26 - 33 of 33 - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals) < Older 
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Adam H. Kerman  
View profile  
 More options Nov 1, 6:13 am
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
From: "Adam H. Kerman" <a...@chinet.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 19:13:16 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Sun, Nov 1 2009 6:13 am
Subject: Re: number exhaustion and portability [Telecom]

John Levine <jo...@iecc.com> wrote:
> One question to which I've never gotten a good answer is whether
> it's possible to port a number to a switch if the switch doesn't
> have any numbers of its own in the number's rate center.

No, it's not possible, for that would mean true customer service.

I had the same land line number for 20 years. I tried to use reason
and logic to explain to Illinois Bell/Ameritech/SBC/AT&T that the
number portability database is a translation table that does not care
if the number points to a loop on a competitor's switch, a cell phone,
or a loop on a foreign switch in AT&T's network.

It fell on deaf ears.

If the federal regulation for number portability is on a rate center
basis, well, we all know that some locations in the rate center's
polygon may have a different wire center, so the concept of "foreign
switch" already exists in the logic of the translation table.

They used to have a nice service that allowed the number to ring at
two different locations both served by the same switch if someone is
relocating locally. The period of overlap was a month or two. You
could pay for a much longer period of overlaps, a few bucks extra a
month. They don't do that any more.

They no longer offer residential foreign exchange service, somewhat
expensive.  I assume business foreign exchange service is still
offered, but I gave up at that point and had the number ported to a
cell phone.

> I don't see any technical bar to porting to such a switch.

As a friend of mine points out, finding the practical solution with
engineering is the easy part. The difficult part is changing the
nature of the social situation, the custom, or the politics that
retains the status quo.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "Area code 533 assigned for personal communications services [Telecom]" by David Kaye
David Kaye  
View profile  
 More options Nov 2, 9:08 pm
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
From: sfdavidka...@yahoo.com (David Kaye)
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 10:08:33 GMT
Local: Mon, Nov 2 2009 9:08 pm
Subject: Re: Area code 533 assigned for personal communications services [Telecom]

Wesr...@aol.com wrote:
> I can't imagine anyone would call a cell-only number to call a local
> plumber, handyman, or any other outfit publishing such a number in
> their advertisements.

I make my living this way.  I have yellow pages ads and only one
phone, a cell phone.  Nobody complains.

--
"You're in probably the wickedest, most corrupt city, most
Godless city in America." -- Fr Mullen, "San Francisco"


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "Area code 533 assigned for personal communications services [Telecom]" by John Mayson
John Mayson  
View profile  
 More options Nov 3, 4:49 am
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
From: John Mayson <j...@mayson.us>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 11:49:09 -0600
Local: Tues, Nov 3 2009 4:49 am
Subject: Re: [telecom] Area code 533 assigned for personal communications services [Telecom]

On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 4:08 AM, David Kaye <sfdavidka...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Wesr...@aol.com wrote:

>> I can't imagine anyone would call a cell-only number to call a local
>> plumber, handyman, or any other outfit publishing such a number in
>> their advertisements.

> I make my living this way. I have yellow pages ads and only one
> phone, a cell phone. Nobody complains.

How many would know?  Various consumer protection agencies warn people
against relying on businesses with only a cell phone number.  The idea
is you could be from out-of-town or fly-by-night.  You didn't say
which business you were in.  On a professional level I've worked with
sales professionals who have only a cell phone number, and that's
fine.

Back in March we had a huge hail storm here and roofing companies from
all over flooded the area trying to drum up business.  I had a guy
with Missouri tags and a Georgia (770) phone number ask what the bids
were I had received and he'd knock a little off.  Various government
officials via the media were warning people about these sort of
operations.

I knew a guy who had a glass and roofing business (he sold it years
ago).  He got a landline number and just forwarded it to a cell phone.

John

--
John Mayson <j...@mayson.us>
Austin, Texas, USA


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "Area code 533 assigned for personal communications services [Telecom]" by David Kaye
David Kaye  
View profile  
 More options Nov 3, 10:23 pm
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
From: sfdavidka...@yahoo.com (David Kaye)
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 11:23:50 GMT
Local: Tues, Nov 3 2009 10:23 pm
Subject: Re: Area code 533 assigned for personal communications services [Telecom]

John Mayson <j...@mayson.us> wrote:
> How many would know?  Various consumer protection agencies warn
> people against relying on businesses with only a cell phone number.
> The idea is you could be from out-of-town or fly-by-night.  You
> didn't say which business you were in.

I do computer tech support, mostly for Windows machines.  Nobody cares
that I only have a cell phone, but then as you say, how would they
know?  They also allow me to remove computers from their homes when
there is extensive stuff to do such as HD replacement, remounting
Windows, etc., and they have nothing from me but a business card --
without even an address on it.

BUT, and here's the big BUT -- I have an ad in the yellow pages.  They
figure that if I'm willing to spend money on yellow pages advertising
then I must be fairly responsible, since, as we all know, yellow pages
advertising costs a lot.  Thus, the expense of yp advertising tends to
be self-select a higher caliber of entrepreneur.

Long live the yellow pages!

--
"You're in probably the wickedest, most corrupt city, most
Godless city in America." -- Fr Mullen, "San Francisco"


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Richard  
View profile  
 More options Nov 3, 5:44 pm
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
From: Richard <r...@richbonnie.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 22:44:03 -0800
Local: Tues, Nov 3 2009 5:44 pm
Subject: Re: Area code 533 assigned for personal communications services [Telecom]

On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 20:13:27 EDT, Wesr...@aol.com wrote:
> I can't imagine anyone would call a cell-only number to call a local
> plumber, handyman, or any other outfit publishing such a number in
> their advertisements.

In the USA, there is no way to tell whether a particular number in
your area code is a cell phone, especially considering number
portability, where you can have your land-line number re-assigned to a
cell phone.

Another way, which was used before number portability: In my town, a
one-man air-conditioner business lives so far out of town that the
wired phone lines don't reach him.  He has a phone number with a
land-line prefix, with no phone line assigned to it.  All calls are
auto-transfered to his cell phone.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Joseph Singer  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 8:53 am
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
From: Joseph Singer <joeofseat...@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 13:53:40 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 8:53 am
Subject: Re: Area code 533 assigned for personal communications services [Telecom]
Mon, 02 Nov 2009 22:44:03 -0800 Richard <r...@richbonnie.com> wrote:

> In the USA, there is no way to tell whether a particular number in
> your area code is a cell phone, especially considering number
> portability, where you can have your land-line number re-assigned to a
> cell phone.

Actually, there *is* a way to tell if a number is a mobile number or a
regular number.  Go to https://www.wirelessamberalerts.org/index.jsp
and input a 10-digit number.  The result will either give the name of
the mobile operating company or you'll get an error message that the
number you have input is not a wireless number.

If you wish to see who that area code and CO prefix holds that
numbering space go to http://www.telcodata.us.  It even lists down to
'thousands' block in the numbering. It's still possible that the
number could have been ported to another entity e.g. it was held by
the ILEC and then transferred to the CLEC or vice versa.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "Ported number database (was: Area code 533 assigned for personal communications services) [Telecom]" by Adam H. Kerman
Adam H. Kerman  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 5:37 pm
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
From: "Adam H. Kerman" <a...@chinet.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 06:37:57 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 5:37 pm
Subject: Ported number database (was: Area code 533 assigned for personal communications services) [Telecom]

So, is there a publicly accessible database of ported numbers? I know
the unsolicited call centers are required to purge their calling lists
of known numbers ported to cell phones, but has anyone made the
database available for single lookups?

And does the database include numbers ported from cell phone to land
lines?


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "Area code 533 assigned for personal communications services [Telecom]" by ra...@vt.edu
ra...@vt.edu  
View profile  
 More options Nov 10, 4:39 am
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
From: ra...@vt.edu
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:39:16 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Tues, Nov 10 2009 4:39 am
Subject: Re: Area code 533 assigned for personal communications services [Telecom]

Joseph Singer <joeofseat...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Actually, there *is* a way to tell if a number is a mobile number or a
> regular number.  Go to https://www.wirelessamberalerts.org/index.jsp
> and input a 10-digit number.  The result will either give the name of
> the mobile operating company or you'll get an error message that the
> number you have input is not a wireless number.
> If you wish to see who that area code and CO prefix holds that
> numbering space go to http://www.telcodata.us.  It even lists down
> to 'thousands' block in the numbering. It's still possible that the
> number could have been ported to another entity e.g. it was held by
> the ILEC and then transferred to the CLEC or vice versa.

Well, the first web link correctly identified my wireless carrier for
a ported number that used to be a Verizon land line at my house.  The
number was ported several years ago, so whatever databse they are
using has had time to catch up.

Bill Ranck
Blacksburg, Va.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages < Older 
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google