Message from discussion
CEC report
Received: by 10.36.38.11 with SMTP id l11mr3201509nzl.1191979891548;
Tue, 09 Oct 2007 18:31:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com with HTTP;
Wed, 10 Oct 2007 01:31:30 +0000 (UTC)
X-IP: 139.230.82.60
From: phi <PhilipHings...@gmail.com>
To: Computational Intelligence and Co-evolution <coevolve@googlegroups.com>
Subject: CEC report
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 01:31:30 -0000
Message-ID: <1191979890.428945.201010@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
X-HTTP-Via: 1.1 SCISMLFW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi everyone
I thought I would post a brief report on the recent CEC in Singapore.
It's brief because, unfortunately, I got a stomach bug early on in the
conference and had to spend the rest of the time close to my bathroom.
So I didn't get to many talks and missed out on catching up with lots
of people. If anyone else was there, maybe you could fill in some
gaps! Evan? Julian? Enyone?
I did manage to get to a couple of the keynote talks.
One was by Xin Yao: "A Rigorous Theoretical Framework for Measuring
Generalisation of Co-evolutionary Learning" . See
http://cec2007.nus.edu.sg/staticPages/plenary%20speakers.html#ARigorous
. This was a very good talk with some interesting new ideas.
Simon Lucas gave a talk about CI in games: "Games, and The Design of
New Hybrid Evolutionary and Temporal Difference Learning Algorithms".
Many of his examples used co-evolution. Actually, I chaired a special
session on CI in games. Of the 6 talks, 5 were about co-evolution
(mine was the only one that wasn't!) See
http://cec2007.nus.edu.sg/staticPages/plenary%20speakers.html#GamesAnd
for an abstract of Simon's talk.
Incidentally, no-one has so far responded to the suggestion of running
a Symposium on Co-evolution at the next SSCI - fair enough, it would
be a major exercise. It would be a good way to broaden the audience
for co-evolutionary theory though - there was a lot of interchange of
people between the different symposia at SSCI in Hawaii - more than
at, say, a WCCI.
But how about a special session on co-evolution at WCCI in Hong Kong
next year? Any takers for that? The workload for a special session is
not that high and it is quite straightforward to run one.
regards, phi