<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>Computational Intelligence and Co-evolution Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/coevolve</link>
  <description>This group is operated by the IEEE Computational Intelligence Society Task Force on Computaional Intelligence and Co-evolution. The purpose of the group is to support each other in our use of evolutionary computation to study co-evolution.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Games: new keynote speakers, competitions, tutorials...</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/coevolve/browse_frm/thread/4d51f1819194777e/e19bdc71f2b81547?show_docid=e19bdc71f2b81547</link>
  <description>
  IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Games (CIG-2009) &lt;br&gt; Milano, Italy - September 7-10, 2009 &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.ieee-cig.org&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;The 2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Games brings &lt;br&gt; together leading researchers and practitioners from academia and &lt;br&gt; industry to discuss recent advances and explore future directions in
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/coevolve/browse_frm/thread/4d51f1819194777e</guid>
  <author>
  julian.togel...@gmail.com
  (Julian Togelius)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 20:31:41 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>No coevolution track at GECCO next year</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/coevolve/browse_frm/thread/f08aaae525987feb/32c8723a9efd10ed?show_docid=32c8723a9efd10ed</link>
  <description>
  FYI: Because the submissions to the coevolution track at GECCO have &lt;br&gt; gradually decreased (and were especially low this year), GECCO has &lt;br&gt; dropped the track ... at least for the time being. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;When I spoke with Franz Rothlauf (chair for GECCO 2009) about this, he &lt;br&gt; pointed out the steady decline, which surprised me. Every year, I
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/coevolve/browse_frm/thread/f08aaae525987feb</guid>
  <author>
  p...@tesseract.org
  (R. Paul Wiegand)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:45:07 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>CFP: Special Session on Coevolution at IEEE Computational Intelligence and Games</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/coevolve/browse_frm/thread/013085400e619977/29040c9690ca598d?show_docid=29040c9690ca598d</link>
  <description>
  Coevolution in Games ( &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.csse.uwa.edu.au/cig08/specialSessions.html&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; ) &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;A Special Session at IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and &lt;br&gt; Games &lt;br&gt; Perth, Australia &lt;br&gt; 15-18 December, 2008 &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Special Session Chairs: Julian Togelius, Alan Blair and Philip &lt;br&gt; Hingston &lt;br&gt; Contact: julian.togelius AT gmail.com
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/coevolve/browse_frm/thread/013085400e619977</guid>
  <author>
  philiphings...@gmail.com
  (phi)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 06:45:11 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Coevolution as game tree search</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/coevolve/browse_frm/thread/dcabbbbd4f7ac4db/dc18dd107baf18aa?show_docid=dc18dd107baf18aa</link>
  <description>
  Greetings, everyone. &lt;br&gt; My research group is exploring coevolution as game tree search, &lt;br&gt; specifically for the game of Go. We are aware of many attempt to use &lt;br&gt; genetic algorithms to evolve players or board evaluators over the &lt;br&gt; course of many games, but we are trying to use coevolution to find &lt;br&gt; the best move (or at least a good move) during the course of a single
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/coevolve/browse_frm/thread/dcabbbbd4f7ac4db</guid>
  <author>
  dr...@lclark.edu
  (Peter Drake)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 04:18:21 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>WCCI</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/coevolve/browse_frm/thread/097b0d64fb75b3c5/24425cfac64f6df1?show_docid=24425cfac64f6df1</link>
  <description>
  Hi everyone &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Would anyone be interested in getting together at WCCI to discuss &lt;br&gt; life, co-evolution, and this group? &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;cheers, phi
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/coevolve/browse_frm/thread/097b0d64fb75b3c5</guid>
  <author>
  philiphings...@gmail.com
  (phi)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 01:30:49 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Task force chair</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/coevolve/browse_frm/thread/f1720a6fb8b73c92/7f25d1de0bde4394?show_docid=7f25d1de0bde4394</link>
  <description>
  Dear all &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;I have been invited to continue as task force chair for 2008. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;If anyone would like to take on the role, perhaps you could email me &lt;br&gt; privately (p.hings...@ecu.edu.au). While I&#39;m happy to continue in the &lt;br&gt; role, some of you are closer to the pulse than me and if you are &lt;br&gt; motivated, would stand a better chance of being effective, I feel.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/coevolve/browse_frm/thread/f1720a6fb8b73c92</guid>
  <author>
  philiphings...@gmail.com
  (phi)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 05:17:06 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Book Chapter</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/coevolve/browse_frm/thread/1f15bcb0de471bac/6a86c77ec085fcf1?show_docid=6a86c77ec085fcf1</link>
  <description>
  Hi everyone &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;I have been invited to contribute a co-evolution chapter to an &lt;br&gt; upcoming book (well anyway to submit a proposal for one), &amp;quot;Nature- &lt;br&gt; Inspired Informatics for Intelligent Applications and Knowledge &lt;br&gt; Discovery: Implications in Business, Science and Engineering&amp;quot;. I feel &lt;br&gt; uneasy about representing myself as an expert on co-evolution. I
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/coevolve/browse_frm/thread/1f15bcb0de471bac</guid>
  <author>
  philiphings...@gmail.com
  (phi)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 09:09:03 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>fitness for coevolution</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/coevolve/browse_frm/thread/2dd1bc8caa24bc53/b7bf69a983b38481?show_docid=b7bf69a983b38481</link>
  <description>
  Hi all &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;We have discussed this topic before, but I have been thinking about a &lt;br&gt; specific application lately which I think provides a different &lt;br&gt; perspective on the question. I thought I&#39;d ask what you all think. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;The question is: what is the &amp;quot;correct&amp;quot; fitness function for co- &lt;br&gt; evolution? &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Xin Yao gave a very nice plenary at CEC (&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/~xin/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/coevolve/browse_frm/thread/2dd1bc8caa24bc53</guid>
  <author>
  philiphings...@gmail.com
  (phi)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 22:27:21 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>CEC report</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/coevolve/browse_frm/thread/dab4abbce7ce5b7f/d17cada6ea11faae?show_docid=d17cada6ea11faae</link>
  <description>
  Hi everyone &lt;br&gt; I thought I would post a brief report on the recent CEC in Singapore. &lt;br&gt; It&#39;s brief because, unfortunately, I got a stomach bug early on in the &lt;br&gt; conference and had to spend the rest of the time close to my bathroom. &lt;br&gt; So I didn&#39;t get to many talks and missed out on catching up with lots &lt;br&gt; of people. If anyone else was there, maybe you could fill in some
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/coevolve/browse_frm/thread/dab4abbce7ce5b7f</guid>
  <author>
  philiphings...@gmail.com
  (phi)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 01:31:30 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>More questions than answers.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/coevolve/browse_frm/thread/8a328a62c095cfe7/987817094e5530e6?show_docid=987817094e5530e6</link>
  <description>
  Hi everyone. &lt;br&gt; I apologise for a) being inactive in this group until now, and b) being &lt;br&gt; rather stochastic in the structure of these comments. &lt;br&gt; On the question of how do we attract more people to the field of &lt;br&gt; co-evolution, it may be worth a short reflection and ask why each of us was &lt;br&gt; drawn to co-evolution in the first place? Personally my first introduction
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/coevolve/browse_frm/thread/8a328a62c095cfe7</guid>
  <author>
  banana.l...@gmail.com
  (Evan Hughes)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 16:29:10 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>SSCI Symposium/Workshop</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/coevolve/browse_frm/thread/1449100795392e0d/cf0d2e0707e4b4db?show_docid=cf0d2e0707e4b4db</link>
  <description>
  Hi everyone &lt;br&gt; I have received the following suggestion from Vin Piuri: &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;in 2009 I will lead a proposal for organizing the Symposium Series on &lt;br&gt; Computational Inteligence, sponsored by IEEE CIS, as David Fogel did &lt;br&gt; in 2007 in the Hawaii. &lt;br&gt; We are considering various locations in the east coast of the USA &lt;br&gt; about in March-April 2009. We will finalize the choice soon.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/coevolve/browse_frm/thread/1449100795392e0d</guid>
  <author>
  philiphings...@gmail.com
  (phi)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 00:20:07 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Discussing the idea of a special issue on CoEC</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/coevolve/browse_frm/thread/bf29eb5c0725df3c/8a302699a12e5276?show_docid=8a302699a12e5276</link>
  <description>
  I am reluctant to take up another service project, as I already have &lt;br&gt; my hands full with FOGA ... and that&#39;s over a year away. But *AM* &lt;br&gt; interested in discussing the idea of a special issue, even if I am not &lt;br&gt; willing to edit it. 8^) &lt;br&gt; Whenever someone mentions the possibility of a special issue, I &lt;br&gt; immediately think: Do I have anything to submit to such an issue?
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/coevolve/browse_frm/thread/bf29eb5c0725df3c</guid>
  <author>
  p...@tesseract.org
  (R. Paul Wiegand)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 15:49:40 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>GECCO Discussion on Coevolution Task Force</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/coevolve/browse_frm/thread/6de37f1dbe013ce2/9119f6a53a0f10f5?show_docid=9119f6a53a0f10f5</link>
  <description>
  GECCO REPORT &lt;br&gt; As readers of this forum know, I attempted to collect a group of &lt;br&gt; people to discuss some of the issues raised in a recent thread on this &lt;br&gt; website about the Coevolution Task Force itself. This attempt was &lt;br&gt; only marginally successful: Despite the post here and on the GECCO &lt;br&gt; wiki, interest in such a discussion was modest.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/coevolve/browse_frm/thread/6de37f1dbe013ce2</guid>
  <author>
  p...@tesseract.org
  (R. Paul Wiegand)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 11:28:52 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>TF report</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/coevolve/browse_frm/thread/062cdcc41414e715/10ea3cf73cce4511?show_docid=10ea3cf73cce4511</link>
  <description>
  Dear Colleagues &lt;br&gt; I have been asked by Ali Zalzala of ECTC for this &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;It is now the time when I ask you to provide me with your TF &lt;br&gt; activities for the last six months. Please make sure you include the &lt;br&gt; list given in items 1-4 of my email dates 3 June 2007 (no worries, a &lt;br&gt; copy is attached herewith!) &lt;br&gt; I do appreciate you must be very busy this time of year, but please
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/coevolve/browse_frm/thread/062cdcc41414e715</guid>
  <author>
  philiphings...@gmail.com
  (phi)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 14:53:10 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>More on Task Forces</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/coevolve/browse_frm/thread/edf5bb9405798e14/c8cb0ea422d1189c?show_docid=c8cb0ea422d1189c</link>
  <description>
  I thought I would pass on this advice about task forces, FYI &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;The purpose of task force (TF) is to build an active and healthy &lt;br&gt; infrastructure to promote specific well-focused topical areas within &lt;br&gt; EC to ensure continuing growth and vitality of the CIS. The Chair of &lt;br&gt; each TF is recruited by the Chair of ECTC and serves for one-year
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/coevolve/browse_frm/thread/edf5bb9405798e14</guid>
  <author>
  philiphings...@gmail.com
  (phi)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 01:38:53 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>We are now a task force</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/coevolve/browse_frm/thread/c1d564d97140622c/1828c9ac5b66800e?show_docid=1828c9ac5b66800e</link>
  <description>
  Dear colleagues &lt;br&gt; FYI, I recently received the advice below. Accordingly, I&#39;ve changed &lt;br&gt; our description to &amp;quot;task force&amp;quot;. &lt;br&gt; This got me thinking - &amp;quot;task force&amp;quot; sounds somehow more dynamic than &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;working group&amp;quot;. What do you all think about ramping up our &lt;br&gt; activities? A quick search on google shows up a GECCO workshop in 2002
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/coevolve/browse_frm/thread/c1d564d97140622c</guid>
  <author>
  philiphings...@gmail.com
  (phi)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 02:36:18 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>AAAI-07 Video Competition</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/coevolve/browse_frm/thread/91bbb87ca77e419a/010437737cbe578a?show_docid=010437737cbe578a</link>
  <description>
  AAAI solicits submissions for a new online video competition. The goal &lt;br&gt; of this competition is to communicate to the World how much fun AI &lt;br&gt; (research and application) is and, in particular, to document exciting &lt;br&gt; research and applications using artificial intelligence. The rules are &lt;br&gt; simple: Compose a short video about an exciting AI project, and
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/coevolve/browse_frm/thread/91bbb87ca77e419a</guid>
  <author>
  p...@tesseract.org
  (R. Paul Wiegand)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 15:26:50 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Cost of Coevolutionary Algorithms</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/coevolve/browse_frm/thread/855846b91150313c/3ad62f665d215cd1?show_docid=3ad62f665d215cd1</link>
  <description>
  I&#39;ve been thinking about assessing the cost of a coevolutionary &lt;br&gt; algorithm. I think that the lack of an explicit objective function &lt;br&gt; makes cost assessment tricky in different way from the ordinary issues &lt;br&gt; surrounding assessing cost in EC. I was hoping we could get some list &lt;br&gt; of references started and some discussion on
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/coevolve/browse_frm/thread/855846b91150313c</guid>
  <author>
  abu...@gmail.com
  (abucci)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:53:45 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
