Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion PF inadequacy: queue download
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
jared r r spiegel  
View profile  
 More options May 1 2006, 5:45 pm
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.openbsd-pf
From: j...@ice-nine.org (jared r r spiegel)
Date: 1 May 2006 00:45:05 -0700
Local: Mon, May 1 2006 5:45 pm
Subject: Re: PF inadequacy: queue download

On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 05:10:40PM +0200, Stanislaw Halik wrote:

> I can speak for myself - I can't afford both the hardware and the
> electricity bill for a separate machine. Maybe downstream limiting isn't
> very robust, but IMO is the biggest thing pf/altq lacks.

  i queue the incoming downstream on the outbound-towards-my-LAN side.

  works just as good as it possibly could if pf had a "download" queue
  mechanism, if not better.

  if you are in a colo situation and you can't afford a little soekris
  ( or somethin' ) to drop in between and do this -- well... kudos
  on finding so inexpensive a colo that you can afford that but not
  a little 1 time ~250 USD or so for the investment on soekris/whatever

--

  jared

[ openbsd 3.9-current GENERIC ( mar 15 ) // i386 ]


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google