| |
bit.listserv.openbsd-pf |
>> I can speak for myself - I can't afford both the hardware and the > What I tried to express in the last paragraph of the referenced mail Old messages that might be relevant:
> On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 05:10:40PM +0200, Stanislaw Halik wrote:
>> electricity bill for a separate machine. Maybe downstream limiting
>> isn't
>> very robust, but IMO is the biggest thing pf/altq lacks.
> was that it's not pf that's lacking anything, but altq. There simply
> are no input queues with altq. If you added those queues to altq, you
> might not even have to change a single line in pf to get them used.
limiting purposes, referred to as the "traffic conditioner" (CDNR).
That capability was removed when the classifier was merged with pf.
http://www.benzedrine.cx/pf/msg02871.html
http://www.benzedrine.cx/pf/msg07159.html (bottom)