|
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.openbsd-pf
From: kestas....@gmail.com
Date: 30 Apr 2006 08:22:51 -0700
Local: Mon, May 1 2006 1:22 am
Subject: Re: PF inadequacy: queue download
I don't think time spent developing PF or ALTQ could be better spent
developing something other than download queueing. Everyone here seems to agree it's PF's worst deficiency. I'm thinking perhaps there's some messy hack I can come up with using > and there are 'lots of people' that care deeply about this I said lots of people *here*, and there aren't close to 40 here, and $500 is very steep for an extra box which has to do so little, and this wouldn't require a whole hackathon to code. I'm not sure why you're being so resistant to a feature request. > By all means, try it. There are more readers (and developers) on the misc@ and tech@ lists, so I'd start there. I posted in misc, but no-one was biting, and I've just sent one to tech. > Stock altq could put token buckets on input interfaces for rate Interesting, I wonder how difficult it would be to get the > limiting purposes, referred to as the "traffic conditioner" (CDNR). > That capability was removed when the classifier was merged with pf. > Old messages that might be relevant: functionality back. Any ideas on why it was dropped in the first place? Kestas You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||