> What I tried to express in the last paragraph of the referenced mail
> was
> that it's not pf that's lacking anything, but altq.
> While there are now ties between pf and altq (pf classifying packets
> for
> altq, and pfctl setting up queues), that doesn't mean the core of altq
> is maintained by the people who maintain pf. It's in separate source
> files, and if you compare the respective CVS histories, you'll see the
> difference.