Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion PF inadequacy: queue download
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
kestas....@gmail.com  
View profile  
 More options May 2 2006, 7:32 pm
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.openbsd-pf
From: kestas....@gmail.com
Date: 2 May 2006 02:32:31 -0700
Local: Tues, May 2 2006 7:32 pm
Subject: Re: PF inadequacy: queue download
What if your firewall box has ssh access on the external interface and
you want to make sure no-one accessing sshd can hog up the bandwidth;
you can't do this with pf.
What if you're using OpenBSD as a desktop computer, you might want to
allow certain applications different bandwidth allowances; you can't do
this with pf (without an extra box).
What if you've got an OpenBSD multi user sshd machine: you want to
allow all users internet access, but you want to make sure they can all
have an equal share of the download bandwidth; you can't do this with
pf (without an extra box, and some sort of very messy identd+tables
hack).

As far as firewalls go I'm a big fan of pf, actually I just finished
writing a fairly detailed walkthrough of my pf.conf (
http://kuliukas.com/guide.html ), which is why I don't want to have to
use/recommend something else if I need this functionality; I think
download shaping would be the icing on the cake.
I'm not demanding anyone do anything, I'm not trolling, I just want to
get this acknowledged as an area for potential development. Why
everyone's so resistant to this is beyond me. That this is the only
extra feature I'd like to have in pf I think reflects pretty well on
pf.

Kestas


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google