The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.openbsd-pf
From: kestas....@gmail.com
Date: 29 Apr 2006 16:26:19 -0700
Local: Sun, Apr 30 2006 9:26 am
Subject: Re: PF inadequacy: queue download
> Question's of the form "why hasn't this been done" sound kind of weird I was hoping you'd tell me something along the lines of "Because we > to me, almost as if they were rhetorical. Assuming you haven't donated > blood in the last month, "why haven't you"? Are you really interested in > the petty excuses humans have for not doing things? :) already have, you just need to do XYZ". Unfortunately I also can't afford an extra machine to get the basic > If you added those queues to altq, you might not even have to change a single line in pf to get them used. Well you can only specifiy the total bandwidth for a certain interface, and all queues which belong to an interface are one-way. You'd have to have a way to specify download bandwidth on an interface and have a seperate set of child queues for download. Then you'd have to have a way of sending incoming and outgoing packets belonging to a certain state to two queues. It's doable, but it certainly isn't an internal ALTQ problem. I'd have a look at this problem myself, but I'm not good with C. I was You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||