Web Images Videos Maps News Groups Gmail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion PF inadequacy: queue download
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
kestas....@gmail.com  
View profile  
 More options Apr 30 2006, 9:26 am
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.openbsd-pf
From: kestas....@gmail.com
Date: 29 Apr 2006 16:26:19 -0700
Local: Sun, Apr 30 2006 9:26 am
Subject: Re: PF inadequacy: queue download

> Question's of the form "why hasn't this been done" sound kind of weird
> to me, almost as if they were rhetorical. Assuming you haven't donated
> blood in the last month, "why haven't you"? Are you really interested in
> the petty excuses humans have for not doing things? :)

I was hoping you'd tell me something along the lines of "Because we
already have, you just need to do XYZ".

Unfortunately I also can't afford an extra machine to get the basic
functionality of download queueing.

> If you added those queues to altq, you might not even have to change a single line in pf to get them used.

Well you can only specifiy the total bandwidth for a certain interface,
and all queues which belong to an interface are one-way. You'd have to
have a way to specify download bandwidth on an interface and have a
seperate set of child queues for download. Then you'd have to have a
way of sending incoming and outgoing packets belonging to a certain
state to two queues.

It's doable, but it certainly isn't an internal ALTQ problem.
I read ALTQ and pf were now 'married' (in Theo's words), so I'd think
the problem would require changes to both pf and ALTQ.

I'd have a look at this problem myself, but I'm not good with C. I was
hoping there was some sort of todo list I could petition this to be
added too, because lots of people here seem to agree this is pf's (and
ALTQ's) worst problem.
If there's some sort of bounty system with OpenBSD I'd be happy to set
a bounty so get this done faster.
Kestas


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google