Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion PF inadequacy: queue download
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Stanislaw Halik  
View profile  
 More options Apr 30 2006, 2:16 am
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.openbsd-pf
From: stha...@tehran.lain.pl (Stanislaw Halik)
Date: 29 Apr 2006 09:16:41 -0700
Local: Sun, Apr 30 2006 2:16 am
Subject: Re: PF inadequacy: queue download

On Sat, Apr 29, 2006, Daniel Hartmeier wrote:
>> I know this is possible because IPFW with dummynet doesn't have any
>> problems. If everyone loves PF because of its elegance why can't it do
>> something as simple as queue download traffic?
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/htdig/freebsd-pf/2005-November/00165...

| But it wouldn't change anything, because the congestion is upstream of
| your ALTQ box. You can drop as many packets as you like after you
| received them, that doesn't free up any bandwidth on your downlink.

It surely has its caveats, but has its use, too. I'm stuck with ipfw on
one last machine, because I can't limit bulk TCP traffic with pf. Of
course, downstream limiting will never throttle DoS attacks, ICMP or
'dumb' UDP traffic with no acknowledgements, but works just fine for
everything else. Even on ipfw's contemptible 'dummynet'.

| If you want to do this with ALTQ, you can do so by limiting outgoing
| packets on the "other" interface, assuming the box is forwarding all
| packets between two interfaces.

I can speak for myself - I can't afford both the hardware and the
electricity bill for a separate machine. Maybe downstream limiting isn't
very robust, but IMO is the biggest thing pf/altq lacks.

-- sh

  application_pgp-signature_part
< 1K Download

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google