|
|
bit.listserv.openbsd-pf |
[In a message on 01 May 2006 01:51:35 PDT, I'm sure I'm part of a large majority of list members who would be Sean PS You're all buying your CDs, right? Once I'm employed again, I will be.
kestas....@gmail.com wrote:] Is it a firewall or a dessert topping? Firewalls should firewall, not
>This works adequetly (How could it be "better"? Sounds like zealot
>speak to me.) if the boxes only function is NAT, but if it also runs
>external services queueing inbound traffic on the internal interface
>doesn't work, because external services get priority.
serve services. If you can't afford one box to firewall, and another
to provide services, well, you're in a fix. I got a Sun IPX I'll give
you if you pay shipping (anything to end this topic) -- Hardly sucks
any juice, too.
thrilled to see this topic end. While there's no harm in asking for a
feature expansion, and a discussion about the technical feasibility of
it, when it devolves into accusations of "zealot speak", it's time to
move on.