|
|
bit.listserv.openbsd-pf |
Several users, on several occasions, have shown interest in this feature, I vouch that, if and when development in that area has occurred, I'll do I'm not resistant to this feature, I just don't want to implement it That doesn't mean I discourage anyone else from doing it. Go ahead, knock Is that official enough? Can we move on now? Daniel [1] http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/net/pf.c?rev=1.1&conten... On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 02:32:31AM -0700, kestas....@gmail.com wrote: No problem. I, dhartmei@, in my role as OpenBSD and pf developer[1], hereby
> I'm not demanding anyone do anything, I'm not trolling, I just want to
> get this acknowledged as an area for potential development. Why
> everyone's so resistant to this is beyond me. That this is the only
> extra feature I'd like to have in pf I think reflects pretty well on
> pf.
acknowledge inbound queueing in pf/altq as an area of potential development.
and so far no strong technical reason has been named why it should not be
added.
my best to review, test, and reach a consensus to commit that work.
myself. I'd rather do laundry and watch a movie.
yourself out. It's not a trivial task, you'll earn respect.