<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listserv.openbsd-pf</id>
  <title type="text">bit.listserv.openbsd-pf Google Group</title>
  <subtitle type="text">
  Discussion of OpenBSD Packet Filter.
  </subtitle>
  <link href="/group/bit.listserv.openbsd-pf/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml" rel="self" title="bit.listserv.openbsd-pf feed"/>
  <updated>2009-11-07T13:25:47Z</updated>
  <generator uri="http://groups.google.com.au" version="1.99">Google Groups</generator>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Axel Rau</name>
  <email>axel....@chaos1.de</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-07T13:25:47Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listserv.openbsd-pf/browse_thread/thread/e82b1b9b705f4947/9853cbfe2ac0b189?show_docid=9853cbfe2ac0b189</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listserv.openbsd-pf/browse_thread/thread/e82b1b9b705f4947/9853cbfe2ac0b189?show_docid=9853cbfe2ac0b189"/>
  <title type="text">Re: german t-com´s vdsl</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Am 07.11.2009 um 07:08 schrieb Tobias Wigand: &lt;br&gt; Did you have a look at XORP &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.openbsd.org/4.3_packages/sparc64/xorp-1.4p1.tgz-long.html&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; ? &lt;br&gt; So, your linux box is not involved in none-IPTV traffic via VDSL? &lt;br&gt; Axel &lt;br&gt; --- &lt;br&gt; axel....@chaos1.de PGP-Key:29E99DD6 +49 151 2300 9283 computing @ &lt;br&gt; chaos claudius
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Tobias Wigand</name>
  <email>li...@underscore.de</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-07T13:09:43Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listserv.openbsd-pf/browse_thread/thread/e82b1b9b705f4947/cc1a8277705abe35?show_docid=cc1a8277705abe35</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listserv.openbsd-pf/browse_thread/thread/e82b1b9b705f4947/cc1a8277705abe35?show_docid=cc1a8277705abe35"/>
  <title type="text">Re: german t-com´s vdsl</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hi, &lt;br&gt; Yes I had but there was no IGMP Proxy functionality. It was on the TODO &lt;br&gt; list though. &lt;br&gt; It just does Multicast Routing / IGMP proxying, announces the few nets &lt;br&gt; that have to be routed via Vlan8 dynamically and firewalls itself with &lt;br&gt; user unfriendly IPTables ;) &lt;br&gt; On a sidenote, I would order the cheapest IPTV VDSL offer. The others
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Tobias Wigand</name>
  <email>li...@underscore.de</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-07T06:48:05Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listserv.openbsd-pf/browse_thread/thread/e82b1b9b705f4947/39d461d9ff7896a2?show_docid=39d461d9ff7896a2</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listserv.openbsd-pf/browse_thread/thread/e82b1b9b705f4947/39d461d9ff7896a2?show_docid=39d461d9ff7896a2"/>
  <title type="text">Re: german t-com´s vdsl</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Assuming the same technical infrastructure is used for that offer: yes. &lt;br&gt; I have always found the guys at the onlinekosten.de forum to be very &lt;br&gt; helpful, maybe you can ask there to know for sure. &lt;br&gt; Never tried that. &lt;br&gt; Anyway the HowTo is outdated and does not work anymore for IPTV. Vlan8 &lt;br&gt; is used for Multicast now and the required IGMP version is v3 there.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Axel Rau</name>
  <email>axel....@chaos1.de</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-05T10:06:51Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listserv.openbsd-pf/browse_thread/thread/e82b1b9b705f4947/a57aeeaea9318db8?show_docid=a57aeeaea9318db8</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listserv.openbsd-pf/browse_thread/thread/e82b1b9b705f4947/a57aeeaea9318db8?show_docid=a57aeeaea9318db8"/>
  <title type="text">Re: german t-com´s vdsl</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Am 22.01.2008 um 09:12 schrieb Tobias Wigand: &lt;br&gt; 2 questions come into mind: &lt;br&gt; - Does the new IP-only (w/o IPTV) offer (started in Sep-2009 by German &lt;br&gt; Telekom) &lt;br&gt; still requires the vlan setup? &lt;br&gt; - How does the vlan setup interferes with a carp/pfsync configuration? &lt;br&gt; Axel &lt;br&gt; --- &lt;br&gt; axel....@chaos1.de PGP-Key:29E99DD6 +49 151 2300 9283 computing @
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>peck Woodson</name>
  <email>woodsonpec...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-03T12:35:00Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listserv.openbsd-pf/browse_thread/thread/68cd29165c5867b6/6a7b89e437a0733e?show_docid=6a7b89e437a0733e</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listserv.openbsd-pf/browse_thread/thread/68cd29165c5867b6/6a7b89e437a0733e?show_docid=6a7b89e437a0733e"/>
  <title type="text">Virgin Hate: Virgin Forced Clips</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  ============================== ============================== ============= &lt;br&gt; ========= My sister lose her virginity with me (video) &lt;br&gt; ========= &lt;br&gt; VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV VVVVVVVVVVVV &lt;br&gt; ========= ENTER HERE: &lt;br&gt; ========= &lt;br&gt; ========= &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://movie33.biz/video/us3n&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Stephan A. Rickauer</name>
  <email>stephan.ricka...@startek.ch</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-10-28T13:07:12Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listserv.openbsd-pf/browse_thread/thread/f2ea40655a8ed2af/4ab8b73b72fc6054?show_docid=4ab8b73b72fc6054</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listserv.openbsd-pf/browse_thread/thread/f2ea40655a8ed2af/4ab8b73b72fc6054?show_docid=4ab8b73b72fc6054"/>
  <title type="text">Re: syntax error while using scrub with OpenBSD 4.6</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade46.html#newPF&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Peter N. M. Hansteen</name>
  <email>pe...@bsdly.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-10-28T13:06:37Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listserv.openbsd-pf/browse_thread/thread/f2ea40655a8ed2af/c00986c1d444d9fe?show_docid=c00986c1d444d9fe</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listserv.openbsd-pf/browse_thread/thread/f2ea40655a8ed2af/c00986c1d444d9fe?show_docid=c00986c1d444d9fe"/>
  <title type="text">Re: syntax error while using scrub with OpenBSD 4.6</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Yes, you&#39;ve hit the one small flag day change in OpenBSD 4.6 - try &lt;br&gt; match in all scrub (reassemble tcp) &lt;br&gt; or some variation (some other parameters are possible). It&#39;s in the &lt;br&gt; official docs, but not all the other resources out there that your &lt;br&gt; favorite search engine will turn up have caught up with the news yet.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Robert</name>
  <email>rob...@openbsd.pap.st</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-10-28T12:48:44Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listserv.openbsd-pf/browse_thread/thread/f2ea40655a8ed2af/6f83dae0f3ff9978?show_docid=6f83dae0f3ff9978</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listserv.openbsd-pf/browse_thread/thread/f2ea40655a8ed2af/6f83dae0f3ff9978?show_docid=6f83dae0f3ff9978"/>
  <title type="text">Re: syntax error while using scrub with OpenBSD 4.6</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:29:58 -0700 (PDT) &lt;br&gt; The way to use scrub has changed for 4.6. &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;scrub&amp;quot; is now an option to a normal rule. &lt;br&gt; match in all scrub &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade46.html#newPF&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; - Robert
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Robert</name>
  <email>rob...@openbsd.pap.st</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-10-28T09:41:56Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listserv.openbsd-pf/browse_thread/thread/f2ea40655a8ed2af/61125ec062dd8c65?show_docid=61125ec062dd8c65</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listserv.openbsd-pf/browse_thread/thread/f2ea40655a8ed2af/61125ec062dd8c65?show_docid=61125ec062dd8c65"/>
  <title type="text">Re: syntax error while using scrub with OpenBSD 4.6</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:10:08 -0700 (PDT) &lt;br&gt; remove &amp;quot;fragment&amp;quot; as that&#39;s not a supported option in the scrub context. &lt;br&gt; have a look at the pf.conf manpage. &lt;br&gt; - Robert
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Micha Holzmann</name>
  <email>haldur...@yahoo.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-10-28T08:37:52Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listserv.openbsd-pf/browse_thread/thread/f2ea40655a8ed2af/493d6b14eab082c8?show_docid=493d6b14eab082c8</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listserv.openbsd-pf/browse_thread/thread/f2ea40655a8ed2af/493d6b14eab082c8?show_docid=493d6b14eab082c8"/>
  <title type="text">syntax error while using scrub with OpenBSD 4.6</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hello all, &lt;br&gt; [ the formerly post was not complete because of my web-session was crashed ]. &lt;br&gt; i am fairly new to OpenBSD. I use it for a home router and firewall. &lt;br&gt; Following the recommendations, i want to use the scrub keyword. &lt;br&gt; But regardles how i write it into the pf.conf and check it with pfctl &lt;br&gt; i get a syntax error message.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Micha Holzmann</name>
  <email>haldur...@yahoo.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-10-28T08:19:06Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listserv.openbsd-pf/browse_thread/thread/f2ea40655a8ed2af/7b71439f5ef67afe?show_docid=7b71439f5ef67afe</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listserv.openbsd-pf/browse_thread/thread/f2ea40655a8ed2af/7b71439f5ef67afe?show_docid=7b71439f5ef67afe"/>
  <title type="text">syntax error while using scrub with OpenBSD 4.6</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hello all, &lt;br&gt; i am fairly new to OpenBSD. I use it for a home router and firewall. &lt;br&gt; Following the recommendations, i want to use the scrub keyword. &lt;br&gt; But regardles how i write it into the pf.conf and check it with pfctl &lt;br&gt; i get a syntax error message. &lt;br&gt; I tried several syntax: &lt;br&gt; scrub all &lt;br&gt; scrub in all &lt;br&gt; After using google and other ressources for hours i found a changeset
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>M E</name>
  <email>manpa...@yahoo.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-10-21T12:29:56Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listserv.openbsd-pf/browse_thread/thread/fd1db7af53b32ba5/a1d7c81d20d4158e?show_docid=a1d7c81d20d4158e</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listserv.openbsd-pf/browse_thread/thread/fd1db7af53b32ba5/a1d7c81d20d4158e?show_docid=a1d7c81d20d4158e"/>
  <title type="text">Using PF on Multiple Gateways</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  hello , &lt;br&gt; I wondered if anyone could assist me in writing a simple packet filter firewall on my OpenBSD v4.5. &lt;br&gt; All I intend doing is to have two firewalling machine on a separate network : &lt;br&gt; 192.168.1.1 &lt;br&gt; ext_if = xl0 (dhcp) // Internet interface &lt;br&gt; int_if=xl1          // Internatl interface    &lt;br&gt; 192.168.2.20
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Oliver Humpage</name>
  <email>oli...@bittern.org.uk</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-10-12T16:02:01Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listserv.openbsd-pf/browse_thread/thread/c72e7a67c4c77e46/57eb8345ca62f5fb?show_docid=57eb8345ca62f5fb</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listserv.openbsd-pf/browse_thread/thread/c72e7a67c4c77e46/57eb8345ca62f5fb?show_docid=57eb8345ca62f5fb"/>
  <title type="text">TCP Sequence numbers changing</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hi, &lt;br&gt; I have a suspicion that route-to is changing sequence numbers on TCP packets. &lt;br&gt; My pf-based router is set up so that packets travelling between &lt;br&gt; internal hosts and the internet get routed through a separate IPS box: &lt;br&gt; imagine the IPS as basically a plugin to the router, and packets get &lt;br&gt; temporarily diverted through it on their way out.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Gernot Poerner</name>
  <email>gernot.poer...@web.de</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-10-08T06:55:22Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listserv.openbsd-pf/browse_thread/thread/1a29f49df0410252/516203b2c35ea653?show_docid=516203b2c35ea653</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listserv.openbsd-pf/browse_thread/thread/1a29f49df0410252/516203b2c35ea653?show_docid=516203b2c35ea653"/>
  <title type="text">Re: access to outlook web access through Openbsd</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  and has that server a default gateway (your openbsd box)? &lt;br&gt; Michael K. Smith - Adhost schrieb:
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Michael K. Smith - Adhost</name>
  <email>mksm...@adhost.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-10-07T16:57:35Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listserv.openbsd-pf/browse_thread/thread/1a29f49df0410252/306c97c7558b77b5?show_docid=306c97c7558b77b5</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listserv.openbsd-pf/browse_thread/thread/1a29f49df0410252/306c97c7558b77b5?show_docid=306c97c7558b77b5"/>
  <title type="text">RE: access to outlook web access through Openbsd</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hello John: &lt;br&gt; Those rules look fine. Do you have a corresponding nat statement so &lt;br&gt; that the traffic going back out is NAT&#39;d to a routable address? &lt;br&gt; Regards, &lt;br&gt; Mike
  </summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
