Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion Scanners for agencies
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Ian Murray  
View profile  
 More options Jan 16 2007, 3:35 am
Newsgroups: bit.listproc.stockphoto
From: idmur...@totalise.co.uk (Ian Murray)
Date: 15 Jan 2007 08:35:12 -0800
Local: Tues, Jan 16 2007 3:35 am
Subject: [STOCKPHOTO] Scanners for agencies

Dear all,

I've found the thread about which cameras certain agencies list as
acceptable/non acceptable interesting. As I understand it Getty film
submissions need to be drum scanned or from a narrow range of expensive
high end scanners only. Do list members find that justifiable or do
some see it as overkill/an artificial barrier?

I use a Minolta Dimage Scan Multi Pro for both 35mm and 120- this is
definitely not on the Getty list of acceptable scanners though I've had
many sales through Alamy from this including double page spreads.

I don't have enough technical knowledge to really have a view either
way. I just thought I'd raise it as a discussion point in the hope of
learning more.

Regards,
Ian Murray


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google