<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>bit.listproc.stockphoto Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto</link>
  <description>Stock Photography Industry (Moderated)</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>in addition Best Of Shweta right</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/3d9eee1415045f39/fca293f5ba3e2de5?show_docid=fca293f5ba3e2de5</link>
  <description>
  &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://revive.bachaan.org&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/3d9eee1415045f39</guid>
  <author>
  gilbert.zau...@suddenlink.net
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 09:05:35 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>swinging underneath bit.listproc.stockphoto</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/eb83df7a2f39c21d/43709109b35d95bd?show_docid=43709109b35d95bd</link>
  <description>
  Lisette wrote on 17 Oct 2008 20:53:43 GMT: &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://doubt.dostii.net&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/eb83df7a2f39c21d</guid>
  <author>
  will.h...@msn.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 20:53:43 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>targeting within bit.listproc.stockphoto</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/a3a8626cbc245b03/772e641339eec5d4?show_docid=772e641339eec5d4</link>
  <description>
  Russ wrote on 17 Oct 2008 20:13:08 GMT: &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://must.dostii.net&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/a3a8626cbc245b03</guid>
  <author>
  robette.ponci...@msn.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 20:13:08 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>warn Utpal Dutt</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/6dd6603f4fc2279e/d54d9ae33b726e62?show_docid=d54d9ae33b726e62</link>
  <description>
  Russell wrote on 10 Oct 2008 07:50:03 GMT: &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://widen.dostii.net&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/6dd6603f4fc2279e</guid>
  <author>
  amber.bes...@aol.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 07:50:03 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Shake that Laffy Taffy</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/8b700aede1b7878e/cd987056c3d0ac1f?show_docid=cd987056c3d0ac1f</link>
  <description>
  &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://smell.bharattv.org&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/8b700aede1b7878e</guid>
  <author>
  marion.levint...@msn.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 03:14:52 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Charlene on Bharat TV tamely</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/8f044038cf145b7a/22ce3fb33653dd1f?show_docid=22ce3fb33653dd1f</link>
  <description>
  &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://flee.bharattv.org&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/8f044038cf145b7a</guid>
  <author>
  don...@hotmail.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 17:31:20 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>bollywood nudity for bit.listproc.stockphoto</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/0089bfbd54801d05/cc35a47d5b84d5c4?show_docid=cc35a47d5b84d5c4</link>
  <description>
  &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://defendant.bollywoodmantra.net&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/0089bfbd54801d05</guid>
  <author>
  dianna.just...@yahoo.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 06:51:06 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>bit.listproc.stockphoto</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/3b76fbccd2310fc1/3b188806b4389eec?show_docid=3b188806b4389eec</link>
  <description>
  -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- &lt;br&gt; back later, has a truly frightening potential for abuse. &lt;br&gt; George Orwell issued a warning. &lt;br&gt; He told us that freedom is too much taken for granted, that it needs to &lt;br&gt; be carefully watched and protected. His last word on the subject was a &lt;br&gt; plea to his readers: &amp;quot;Don&#39;t let it happen. It depends on you.&amp;quot;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/3b76fbccd2310fc1</guid>
  <author>
  rone...@bit.listproc.stockphoto
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 02:02:20 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>[STOCKPHOTO] Scanners for agencies</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/1a1613aaa4a7b2c6/0f558b971a5f18e6?show_docid=0f558b971a5f18e6</link>
  <description>
  Dear all, &lt;br&gt; I&#39;ve found the thread about which cameras certain agencies list as &lt;br&gt; acceptable/non acceptable interesting. As I understand it Getty film &lt;br&gt; submissions need to be drum scanned or from a narrow range of expensive &lt;br&gt; high end scanners only. Do list members find that justifiable or do &lt;br&gt; some see it as overkill/an artificial barrier?
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/1a1613aaa4a7b2c6</guid>
  <author>
  idmur...@totalise.co.uk
  (Ian Murray)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 16:35:12 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>[STOCKPHOTO] Getty</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/252337a636d7ac83/5d373d51140bdbaa?show_docid=5d373d51140bdbaa</link>
  <description>
  I am just curius, has anyone been accepted to Getty recently? I&#39;d like you apply but I wanted to know how easy it was to get in. &lt;br&gt; Thanks &lt;br&gt; Maggie &lt;br&gt; [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/252337a636d7ac83</guid>
  <author>
  aye-...@comcast.net
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 19:59:21 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>[STOCKPHOTO] Kodak Moment - a little humor (?) for the day</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/de9a8fe8ebf720e9/423f82e2317285a6?show_docid=423f82e2317285a6</link>
  <description>
  A friend of mine who operates a stock photography agency in Atlanta &lt;br&gt; sent this to me and I thought I&#39;d pass it on. I don&#39;t spend much time &lt;br&gt; at YouTube, but now and then there are gems. I think you&#39;ll get a kick &lt;br&gt; out of this. It&#39;s a 3:41 video (safe for viewing by all ages). For &lt;br&gt; those of us photographing digitally, it might make another point as
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/de9a8fe8ebf720e9</guid>
  <author>
  m...@blueplanetphoto.com
  (Mike)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:46:41 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>[STOCKPHOTO] what do photographers want?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/a0bcdbf41f37fa21/a94de1dfbc604c53?show_docid=a94de1dfbc604c53</link>
  <description>
  *Hi All* &lt;br&gt; I am starting a small niche image/stock library in Johannesburg, South &lt;br&gt; Africa. &lt;br&gt; I would like to know what features on a stock library: &lt;br&gt; A - annoy photographers? &lt;br&gt; B - could you not do without? &lt;br&gt; Basically, what would YOUR wish list be on a library, e.g. maintenance &lt;br&gt; of images, reports, payment etc.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/a0bcdbf41f37fa21</guid>
  <author>
  m...@ashwell.co.za
  (Marc Ashwell)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:04:57 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>[STOCKPHOTO] Change must come - Lewis Blackwell - Getty Images group creative director - BJP article</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/44cecd727227cecb/e4234c9dc3f6a202?show_docid=e4234c9dc3f6a202</link>
  <description>
  For info - article in the British Journal of Photography &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.bjp-online.com/public/showPage.html?page=357262&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/44cecd727227cecb</guid>
  <author>
  jock.ayethe...@googlemail.com
  (Jock Ayethenoo)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:23:02 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>[STOCKPHOTO] Re: request advice on efficient keywording</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/2005ab605c694294/5533d7f1152cf55e?show_docid=5533d7f1152cf55e</link>
  <description>
  Per &lt;br&gt; That was extremely helpful. You confirmed what I suspected that ALAMY &lt;br&gt; couldn&#39;t care less about whether there is a space or a semicolon &lt;br&gt; between the keywords. And I agree that there is no guarantee that &lt;br&gt; other search engines will treat the keyword phrases the same way. &lt;br&gt; Thanks. &lt;br&gt; -Larry &lt;br&gt; Larry Brownstein
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/2005ab605c694294</guid>
  <author>
  lar...@larrybrownstein.com
  (Larry Brownstein)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:22:27 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>[STOCKPHOTO] Re: Comp question to photographers in general.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/0f6d9ddc28798861/b0bbb98a05de4303?show_docid=b0bbb98a05de4303</link>
  <description>
  I may be wrong, but was assuming that if you displayed a higher quality jpeg &lt;br&gt; on a monitor, that the full gamut and file quality does not translate to the &lt;br&gt; screen. Do you think most monitors being used today show 100% of what is in &lt;br&gt; a file, regardless of the PS quality level chosen? &lt;br&gt; Ed Verkaik &lt;br&gt; ------------------------------ ------------------------------ ----------
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/0f6d9ddc28798861</guid>
  <author>
  verk...@sympatico.ca
  (Ed Verkaik)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 15:07:25 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>[STOCKPHOTO] Yet another version of sucker stock</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/109c3d5b91b5ae4b/2c02ae6580a3cea5?show_docid=2c02ae6580a3cea5</link>
  <description>
  &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://cameradollars.com/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; Now they&#39;ll sell you a book on how to lose money in photography
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/109c3d5b91b5ae4b</guid>
  <author>
  dcsima...@earthlink.net
  (David Smith)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 23:46:52 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>[STOCKPHOTO] Libraries</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/a09e10575a24624d/3d6b95e5cd02e407?show_docid=3d6b95e5cd02e407</link>
  <description>
  Hellow &lt;br&gt; This my first time i call for advice and ideas for &lt;br&gt; stock photography at stock photograpy libraries. &lt;br&gt; I was submit to a three libraries as FotoLibra in &lt;br&gt; UK,Photo Direct in UK,and PhotoStockPlus in Canada. &lt;br&gt; Iam over 2 years member there,and till now i didn&#39;t &lt;br&gt; get any penny.I am semi-profisional photographer,and most of my work
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/a09e10575a24624d</guid>
  <author>
  hell...@nana.co.il
  (Zvi)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 05:26:16 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>[STOCKPHOTO] Magazine Recommendations</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/b2620e3bd8a11c43/e0ecd6099544436e?show_docid=e0ecd6099544436e</link>
  <description>
  My sub to DIGITAL CAMERA MAGAZINE just ran out and I thought I would ask for &lt;br&gt; recommendations before renewing. This is a UK pub which I find generally &lt;br&gt; superior to the US rags both for quality and content - however, the price to &lt;br&gt; Canada is steep. Any suggestions would be welcome. &lt;br&gt; Carlton McEachern &lt;br&gt; Canadian Since 1832
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/b2620e3bd8a11c43</guid>
  <author>
  carlton.mceach...@sympatico.ca
  (Carlton McEachern)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 14:38:23 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>[STOCKPHOTO] request advice on efficient keywording</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/c64fe4bdd3117c52/b74d97ee9454bd58?show_docid=b74d97ee9454bd58</link>
  <description>
  I use iView MediaPro to keyword my photos. I like that you can apply &lt;br&gt; the same keyword to a large number of photos at one time. &lt;br&gt; I am considering the next step - to apply a bunch of synonyms all at &lt;br&gt; the same time (rather than one keyword at a time) &lt;br&gt; These would be frequently occurring synonyms that I group together in
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/c64fe4bdd3117c52</guid>
  <author>
  lar...@larrybrownstein.com
  (Larry Brownstein)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 00:43:46 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>[STOCKPHOTO] Eyevine</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/66c77bca8d1c39de/4b74dc92a321c24a?show_docid=4b74dc92a321c24a</link>
  <description>
  Hi Folks! &lt;br&gt; What can anyone tell me about Eyevine? &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.eyevinearchive.com/Default.aspx&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; How long has the agency been going, who is behind it etc. Anyone put stuff &lt;br&gt; (voluntary) through them? Seems like the Guardian is now using them to &lt;br&gt; syndicate their photos. &lt;br&gt; Kind regards &lt;br&gt; Pete J &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.petejenkins.co.uk&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/66c77bca8d1c39de</guid>
  <author>
  pe...@petejenkins.co.uk
  (Pete Jenkins)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 00:39:22 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>[STOCKPHOTO] Archival Gold CDs and DVDs</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/bea607c48266508f/e74ae89bc880345b?show_docid=e74ae89bc880345b</link>
  <description>
  Hello, &lt;br&gt; I mentioned SlideScribe in my previous post. Surfing around their site &lt;br&gt; I found Archival Gold CDs and DVDs of the eFilm brand. Anybody knows them? &lt;br&gt; &amp;lt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.slidescribe.com/cmdn.shtml&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; I knew of the Delkin ones. Or is eFilm another brand name for the same &lt;br&gt; product? &lt;br&gt; (I had discontinued Kodak ones a few years ago, but my son &amp;quot;stole&amp;quot;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/bea607c48266508f</guid>
  <author>
  jang...@interconect.com.br
  (Jacques Jangoux)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 01:18:40 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: AW: [STOCKPHOTO] Stock Submissions &amp; EXIF Data</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/d499679d8190aefe/2607a762e3fea369?show_docid=2607a762e3fea369</link>
  <description>
  Hi Deitmar &lt;br&gt; I have a similar workflow but saving a copy as a JPG thankfully does &lt;br&gt; not remove the information about the camera or any of the other &lt;br&gt; associated keywords and contact details. &lt;br&gt; I had a look at your site and if a client pulls a picture off of your &lt;br&gt; screen to try in a comp and then can&#39;t remember where they grabbed
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/d499679d8190aefe</guid>
  <author>
  photo...@photobar.com
  (David Barr)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 02:32:00 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [STOCKPHOTO] Cafepress.com</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/407dae0a87e59c84/a73a1b046ce1f474?show_docid=a73a1b046ce1f474</link>
  <description>
  Chuck: &lt;br&gt; There is no universal answer for this question. I&#39;ve not looked into &lt;br&gt; the specifics of any of the &amp;quot;microstock&amp;quot; RF licenses, but IMHO, You&#39;d &lt;br&gt; have to read the specific terms of agreement for the particular &lt;br&gt; companies RF license. That said, most of the earlier RF licenses &lt;br&gt; (PhotoDisc, etc.) which I did take the time to read, did specifically
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/407dae0a87e59c84</guid>
  <author>
  da...@riecks.com
  (David Riecks)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 12:54:52 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>[STOCKPHOTO] Re: Transparency supplies</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/28ecf6d9962f57f4/682a1b7a72c4e9c2?show_docid=682a1b7a72c4e9c2</link>
  <description>
  one.) &lt;br&gt; I;m really sorry to hear that about Royce - as you say, he was a top &lt;br&gt; notch supplier with good goods at fair prices. My supply of sleeves is &lt;br&gt; running low. I do have a part box of 2x2 undividual sleeves that I no &lt;br&gt; longer use, now that I no longer send slides to submissions. I still &lt;br&gt; like &#39;em for the mf materials.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/28ecf6d9962f57f4</guid>
  <author>
  j...@johnfowler.ca
  (John Fowler)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 09:22:30 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>[STOCKPHOTO] Re: Advice sought on a &quot;historic&quot; photo archive</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/d354f17f9381df77/1b6b091a9f6a1f2f?show_docid=1b6b091a9f6a1f2f</link>
  <description>
  by &lt;br&gt; value &lt;br&gt; I quite agree with him, and we should recognize the value of our work for &lt;br&gt; the future. However, with my one experience with a College that wanted my &lt;br&gt; work for research purposes, they were quite candid about the economics. My &lt;br&gt; collection was of value to them, but in the academic world, they found it
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/d354f17f9381df77</guid>
  <author>
  skoogf...@gmail.com
  (Leif Skoogfors)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 02:00:56 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>[STOCKPHOTO] Advice sought on a &quot;historic&quot; photo archive</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/099c0515fd844bf2/ab295c44b466a27d?show_docid=ab295c44b466a27d</link>
  <description>
  Chatting to an old schoolmate at a party I discovered that he has just &lt;br&gt; been given a huge collection (x00,000??, three pallet loads) of &lt;br&gt; original negs dating from the sixties and seventies which were the &lt;br&gt; pictures taken by staff photographers of an English regional newspaper. &lt;br&gt; He is an illustrator/freelance writer/self publishing local historian
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/099c0515fd844bf2</guid>
  <author>
  liz.t...@btinternet.com
  (mzsupa5)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 14:26:23 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>[STOCKPHOTO] Re: Facts on the loss with ACcLAIM IMAGES</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/6829707d266575eb/ec52c62171cdc09a?show_docid=ec52c62171cdc09a</link>
  <description>
  Hello everybody: &lt;br&gt; My situation was very similar except I only got one answer from a major publisher, most of the others were private users and I don&#39;t expect to see any money from that. &lt;br&gt; Yesterday evening I received an angry and threatening e-mail from Fred V. He asked me to stop harrasing his clients. The truth is that people that will try to steal your images from internet will always exist, and there will also be people smart enough to try to break whatever we do to stop that. My point is that Acclaim violated our rights for allowing these people to download whatever they wanted without proper follow-up.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/6829707d266575eb</guid>
  <author>
  p_coper...@yahoo.com
  (Perla Copernik)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 19:39:29 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>[STOCKPHOTO] Simple question</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/e9df4bf26a5fbc4d/3fa01a9b589152bb?show_docid=3fa01a9b589152bb</link>
  <description>
  Hi folks, &lt;br&gt; I am just curious as to how you all send photos to editors of &lt;br&gt; magazines, etc., when submitting your work for review. When sending &lt;br&gt; images on a CD, do you watermark the CDs, put a copyright line on the &lt;br&gt; photo, send small images with low resolution (or as per the editor&#39;s &lt;br&gt; wishes), some of the above, all of the above? I&#39;ve done stock
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/e9df4bf26a5fbc4d</guid>
  <author>
  photo...@mikelarsenstudios.com
  (Mike)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 21:12:08 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>[STOCKPHOTO] Facts on the loss with ACCLAIM IMAGES</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/acc14b756630f474/25b862f0bc4d04ee?show_docid=25b862f0bc4d04ee</link>
  <description>
  Hello you all out there, &lt;br&gt; I spended my whole Christmas Day today with searching, tracking and &lt;br&gt; checking images i gave to acclaim for sale, writing mails to people &lt;br&gt; who downloaded and so on. &lt;br&gt; As a fact i can tell you all that those &amp;quot;comp downloads&amp;quot; from acclaim &lt;br&gt; where in my case used 60% in a business way that should have been
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/acc14b756630f474</guid>
  <author>
  diet...@stock4u.de
  (dietmar_scholtz)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 14:04:21 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>[STOCKPHOTO] Picscout</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/747d9f7f85f4175c/54c9038bb65e0e77?show_docid=54c9038bb65e0e77</link>
  <description>
  I am looking into signing up with the image tracking company &lt;br&gt; named Picscout. Any information about them would be helpful. &lt;br&gt; Thank you. &lt;br&gt; Steven James Haggard
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/747d9f7f85f4175c</guid>
  <author>
  steve...@actionnet.net
  (stevenje80026)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2006 21:16:40 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>[STOCKPHOTO] Re: Fwd: Trends in Stock Photography 2007 - Citigroup Research Inqui</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/d00cb1349d4c5852/cc90c188f4545ece?show_docid=cc90c188f4545ece</link>
  <description>
  IMHO it&#39;s a scam. In another life I worked with investment and stock brokerage companies. They have tons of money, never do original research and never mention their &amp;quot;targets&amp;quot;. They always use secondary companies to keep private. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt; Also the investment side is Smith Barney Investments and the division is Citigroup Global Markets.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/d00cb1349d4c5852</guid>
  <author>
  paladinp...@yahoo.com
  (Holden Caulfield)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 19:52:22 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>[STOCKPHOTO] Breaking ties with an agency</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/3cd9da4cf99962d5/90a74e2583e947ff?show_docid=90a74e2583e947ff</link>
  <description>
  Hello All: &lt;br&gt; Years ago, I had problems unwinding my relationship with a stock &lt;br&gt; agency back in New England, USA. It was only through involvement with &lt;br&gt; law enforcement that my several thousand original slides were &lt;br&gt; returned, even though some 500 images were &amp;quot;disappeared&amp;quot;, and there &lt;br&gt; is no accounting for them to this day. Some of you on this list also
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/3cd9da4cf99962d5</guid>
  <author>
  mauth...@msn.com
  (Marc Auth)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 16:23:25 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>[STOCKPHOTO] Comp question to photographers in general.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/a188bcd9b76fc48c/f2983cbf19267a8e?show_docid=f2983cbf19267a8e</link>
  <description>
  First, interesting and good news. Today at AI Fred instituted changes &lt;br&gt; in the way the comps are managed somewhat by altering the size, &lt;br&gt; watermark placement, and access to the photographers to information &lt;br&gt; of their downloads. &lt;br&gt; This is great for all of you who are still there and although there &lt;br&gt; is still a long ways to go with needed changes at AI but it really
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/a188bcd9b76fc48c</guid>
  <author>
  chumpyru...@yahoo.com
  (chumpyrules)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 13:06:01 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>[STOCKPHOTO] my (bad) experience with Acclaim</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/7e8a44e27aaa7795/f0933efad0ac6a6c?show_docid=f0933efad0ac6a6c</link>
  <description>
  Hi, &lt;br&gt; I was with acclaim from a very early stage. it was a great idea but now it turned in my eyes &lt;br&gt; into a big set up. I pulled all my images out a few weeks ago. &lt;br&gt; I believe that most photographers which are still with acclaim don&#39;t see that they are now &lt;br&gt; giving their images to a publisher for free. Yes, acclaim now with the google Ads is a
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/7e8a44e27aaa7795</guid>
  <author>
  hicke...@gmail.com
  (natur_fotografie)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 14:05:22 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>[STOCKPHOTO] Acclaim communication and honesty, not personal feuds please!</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/4c484c6e9f9f1ee9/9830032ad9c9bb47?show_docid=9830032ad9c9bb47</link>
  <description>
  Re: Acclaim Images &lt;br&gt; The first thing I want to say is that I think both Cindy and Fred should keep their personal &lt;br&gt; differences off this forum. It serves no purpose other than to fuel what must be an &lt;br&gt; unpleasant situation. &lt;br&gt; I would however as an ex Acclaim contributor I would like to make a few observations
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/4c484c6e9f9f1ee9</guid>
  <author>
  b...@bobelsdale.com
  (Chris Elsdale)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 09:09:44 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>[STOCKPHOTO] Information on Google ads placed on stock sites</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/6eaba6356027a153/00484b2daa6776ab?show_docid=00484b2daa6776ab</link>
  <description>
  I was sent some information last night from some photographers who &lt;br&gt; contribute to Acclaim. For the record I have been in direct contact &lt;br&gt; with just under 90 Acclaim contributors who have contacted me &lt;br&gt; regarding various issues they have with the current set up and &lt;br&gt; management of their images. &lt;br&gt; They have asked me to post this information for them regarding
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/6eaba6356027a153</guid>
  <author>
  chumpyru...@yahoo.com
  (chumpyrules)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 21:24:32 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>[STOCKPHOTO] New Success at Acclaim Images!</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/885011a1099c301e/d4f47da0e01d74b1?show_docid=d4f47da0e01d74b1</link>
  <description>
  Since restructuring my company we have had some tremendous new &lt;br&gt; successes at Acclaim Images and I want to share them since my ex- &lt;br&gt; sister-in-law is so busy attacking me here on this forum. &lt;br&gt; First of all we are now a much more nimble company and once again &lt;br&gt; profitable. &lt;br&gt; We have never missed a payment to our contributors and never will.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/885011a1099c301e</guid>
  <author>
  fred...@yahoo.com
  (Fred)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 20:51:44 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>[STOCKPHOTO] Portrait Photography : One of the Greatest Arts</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/ac19c398ea91503a/53df57c391a02920?show_docid=53df57c391a02920</link>
  <description>
  Portrait Photography : One of the Greatest Arts &lt;br&gt; By: Ispas Marin &lt;br&gt; Before doing any portrait photography there are some very important questions that any photographer should ask himself. What kind of light source it’s going to be used? From what angle the light will fall on the subject? What film, camera and lens are best to use? If you manage to answer all this questions before taking the photo then you will probably make quite a good portrait photography. But i know that you don’t want a good portrait photography, you want a perfect one. So the best way to achieve this performance is to talk with the client trying to know him, his past, his desires. This way you can create distinctive portraits. If you want a real great portrait then you have to add a bit of the client’s personality in the photo. This works very well especially when you make female portrait photography. You shouldn’t look for a face that is over painted by a makeup artist. Try to surprise something that really represents the subject.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/ac19c398ea91503a</guid>
  <author>
  sidra_khan_...@yahoo.com
  (sidra sid)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 20:52:52 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>[STOCKPHOTO] Fwd: Trends in Stock Photography 2007 - Citigroup Research Inquiry</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/1895124556fdfd4f/8bf8e2c6b7592464?show_docid=8bf8e2c6b7592464</link>
  <description>
  I received this today. I&#39;m curious to know if others have received it &lt;br&gt; as well. &lt;br&gt; Steve
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/1895124556fdfd4f</guid>
  <author>
  ssil...@stevesilverphotos.com
  (Steve)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 04:37:49 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>[STOCKPHOTO] Are your images being stolen?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/231fb46cfddd1e99/f354abd1b46eed00?show_docid=f354abd1b46eed00</link>
  <description>
  I am writing this on behalf and at the request of several &lt;br&gt; photographers who contribute to Acclaim Images. For a time I had &lt;br&gt; taken myself out of this and off of this list but at their request, &lt;br&gt; joined again. They have several issues regarding Acclaim and some of &lt;br&gt; its past and current practices and feel I am in a position to give
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/231fb46cfddd1e99</guid>
  <author>
  chumpyru...@yahoo.com
  (chumpyrules)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 01:40:12 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>[STOCKPHOTO] OT: Geography Cup for travel photographers</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/e5a3dc901b5e0d50/fb57b6b97af0289d?show_docid=fb57b6b97af0289d</link>
  <description>
  As a seasonal distraction could I invite US and UK members to take part &lt;br&gt; in the Geography Cup competition between our two nations: &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.geographycup.com./&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; Ian Murray
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/e5a3dc901b5e0d50</guid>
  <author>
  idmur...@totalise.co.uk
  (Ian Murray)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 19:55:52 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>[STOCKPHOTO] Question for Getty photographers</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/92b8f29217761db9/e8f6d7f0ee88d206?show_docid=e8f6d7f0ee88d206</link>
  <description>
  About 6 months ago my images were accepted for upload to the Getty &lt;br&gt; site through an intermediate provider. I started with a fairly small &lt;br&gt; number in order to see if the monthly returns were worth committing a &lt;br&gt; larger number given that it&#39;s an exclusive contract. So far I&#39;ve been &lt;br&gt; pleased with the monthly paycheck and the consistency of sales from
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/92b8f29217761db9</guid>
  <author>
  bsteven...@thegrid.net
  (biggiesnows)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:06:57 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>[STOCKPHOTO] Workbookstock moves to Jupiter</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/65e646e094e5b292/8de5f9f54846d870?show_docid=8de5f9f54846d870</link>
  <description>
  Received a few minutes ago: &lt;br&gt; ------------------------------ ------------------ &lt;br&gt; Jupiterimages - your search ends here &lt;br&gt; ------------------------------ ------------------ &lt;br&gt; Don&#39;t be left out in the cold. &lt;br&gt; From today, the outstanding Workbook Stock collection will no longer be available from &lt;br&gt; Getty Images. Lucky for you, its new home is jupiterimages.co.uk.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/65e646e094e5b292</guid>
  <author>
  iconma...@btconnect.com
  (David Kilpatrick)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:41:00 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>[STOCKPHOTO] Jupiter Images and PhotoLibrary</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/e8a3d3aa05f95b45/74e98172296d8c0f?show_docid=74e98172296d8c0f</link>
  <description>
  Hi, &lt;br&gt; Is anyone here submitting to Jupiter Images or PhotoLibrary? If so could you comment on them? I am curious about sales there particularly. Any pros, cons? &lt;br&gt; Thanks &lt;br&gt; Maggie &lt;br&gt; [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/e8a3d3aa05f95b45</guid>
  <author>
  aye-...@comcast.net
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:05:29 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>[STOCKPHOTO] Manual focusing with Nikon 4000 / 5000 - focusing range </title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/0611137e3fe81ab5/00924a6a84db1227?show_docid=00924a6a84db1227</link>
  <description>
  Hello All, &lt;br&gt; I posted this on another forum but having no reply I will try here. &lt;br&gt; For those of you who still scan, use a Nikon Coolscan 4000 or 5000, &lt;br&gt; and do manual focusing, what range do you consider acceptable? I &lt;br&gt; usually measure the center, then 4 points each about 3/4 toward each &lt;br&gt; corner, plus any important part of the picture. Depending on the
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/0611137e3fe81ab5</guid>
  <author>
  jang...@interconect.com.br
  (Jacques Jangoux)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:02:59 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>[STOCKPHOTO] Re: some help with textbook pricing: E book and CD-ROM&#39;s</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/c04cb41c08278a41/f50fbe0a3954b923?show_docid=f50fbe0a3954b923</link>
  <description>
  Peter, Cindy, Carl, and others who contacted me directly, &lt;br&gt; Thanks for your expert advice. This is a lot more complex than I thought. &lt;br&gt; Best regards, &lt;br&gt; Stuart &lt;br&gt; [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/c04cb41c08278a41</guid>
  <author>
  stu...@studeeo.com
  (Stuart Dee Photography)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:52:55 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>[STOCKPHOTO] Re: Image Ranking at ACclaim Images</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/94e37b42a5b6eeab/29f44cf9a72e4026?show_docid=29f44cf9a72e4026</link>
  <description>
  Hi Ethan, &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt; I really like that idea of having the customers rank, that way there is no bias within the company.... EXCELLENT idea! &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt; Jamie Voetsch &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;------------------------------ --- &lt;br&gt; Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. &lt;br&gt; [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/94e37b42a5b6eeab</guid>
  <author>
  jamievoet...@yahoo.com
  (Jamie Voetsch)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:55:26 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>[STOCKPHOTO] Image Ranking at Acclaim Images</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/c737f7cbff13bdda/aa0dba8752aa2e7f?show_docid=aa0dba8752aa2e7f</link>
  <description>
  I was not going to post anything additionally about what is happening &lt;br&gt; at Acclaim Images because I felt I had finished with what I had to &lt;br&gt; say. I now though, have received several emails from contributors and &lt;br&gt; potential contributors regarding the image ranking system Fred is &lt;br&gt; imposing, how it works, and my thoughts about his direction with
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/c737f7cbff13bdda</guid>
  <author>
  chumpyru...@yahoo.com
  (chumpyrules)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:07:20 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>[STOCKPHOTO] Directly licensing ones own images</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/718763448a44dd58/45015238e3dd7ec4?show_docid=45015238e3dd7ec4</link>
  <description>
  I&#39;m curious if anyone who frequents this forum has had any success &lt;br&gt; or experience licensing their images themselves, via their own website / &lt;br&gt; merchant account or by means of a distribution, image management company &lt;br&gt; such as PhotoShelter. I&#39;m trying to assess the efficacy of directly &lt;br&gt; marketing ones owns stock library. My only means of comparison would be
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/718763448a44dd58</guid>
  <author>
  cameramancam...@yahoo.com
  (cameramancamera)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:52:02 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>[STOCKPHOTO] Nikon Australia refuse Pro Loan</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/6a4f05902a3a494d/1bd117371c9c88a4?show_docid=1bd117371c9c88a4</link>
  <description>
  Nikon Australia refuse pro loan while Nikon D2x is in for repair &lt;br&gt; lasting 3 weeks. &lt;br&gt; I&#39;ll tell the story, an internal part that controls the aperture on &lt;br&gt; my Nikon D2x broke off. I took the camera to an aurthorized Nikon &lt;br&gt; repair centre in Sydney Australia. A common problem so I would think, &lt;br&gt; also think! quick turn around, not so, part not in stock by Nikon
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.au/group/bit.listproc.stockphoto/browse_frm/thread/6a4f05902a3a494d</guid>
  <author>
  cliff...@sportsphotos.com.au
  (Clifford)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 01:00:16 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
