bit.listproc.stockphoto Google Group

in addition Best Of Shweta right

gilbert.zau...@suddenlink.net — Sat, 18 Oct 2008 09:05:35 UT

[link]

swinging underneath bit.listproc.stockphoto

will.h...@msn.com — Fri, 17 Oct 2008 20:53:43 UT

Lisette wrote on 17 Oct 2008 20:53:43 GMT:
[link]

targeting within bit.listproc.stockphoto

robette.ponci...@msn.com — Fri, 17 Oct 2008 20:13:08 UT

Russ wrote on 17 Oct 2008 20:13:08 GMT:
[link]

warn Utpal Dutt

amber.bes...@aol.com — Fri, 10 Oct 2008 07:50:03 UT

Russell wrote on 10 Oct 2008 07:50:03 GMT:
[link]

Shake that Laffy Taffy

marion.levint...@msn.com — Sun, 28 Sep 2008 03:14:52 UT

[link]

Charlene on Bharat TV tamely

don...@hotmail.com — Thu, 25 Sep 2008 17:31:20 UT

[link]

bollywood nudity for bit.listproc.stockphoto

dianna.just...@yahoo.com — Mon, 08 Sep 2008 06:51:06 UT

[link]

bit.listproc.stockphoto

rone...@bit.listproc.stockphoto — Tue, 24 Jul 2007 02:02:20 UT

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
back later, has a truly frightening potential for abuse.
George Orwell issued a warning.
He told us that freedom is too much taken for granted, that it needs to
be carefully watched and protected. His last word on the subject was a
plea to his readers: "Don't let it happen. It depends on you."

[STOCKPHOTO] Scanners for agencies

idmur...@totalise.co.uk (Ian Murray) — Mon, 15 Jan 2007 16:35:12 UT

Dear all,
I've found the thread about which cameras certain agencies list as
acceptable/non acceptable interesting. As I understand it Getty film
submissions need to be drum scanned or from a narrow range of expensive
high end scanners only. Do list members find that justifiable or do
some see it as overkill/an artificial barrier?

[STOCKPHOTO] Getty

aye-...@comcast.net — Sun, 14 Jan 2007 19:59:21 UT

I am just curius, has anyone been accepted to Getty recently? I'd like you apply but I wanted to know how easy it was to get in.
Thanks
Maggie
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[STOCKPHOTO] Kodak Moment - a little humor (?) for the day

m...@blueplanetphoto.com (Mike) — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:46:41 UT

A friend of mine who operates a stock photography agency in Atlanta
sent this to me and I thought I'd pass it on. I don't spend much time
at YouTube, but now and then there are gems. I think you'll get a kick
out of this. It's a 3:41 video (safe for viewing by all ages). For
those of us photographing digitally, it might make another point as

[STOCKPHOTO] what do photographers want?

m...@ashwell.co.za (Marc Ashwell) — Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:04:57 UT

*Hi All*
I am starting a small niche image/stock library in Johannesburg, South
Africa.
I would like to know what features on a stock library:
A - annoy photographers?
B - could you not do without?
Basically, what would YOUR wish list be on a library, e.g. maintenance
of images, reports, payment etc.

[STOCKPHOTO] Change must come - Lewis Blackwell - Getty Images group creative director - BJP article

jock.ayethe...@googlemail.com (Jock Ayethenoo) — Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:23:02 UT

For info - article in the British Journal of Photography
[link]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[STOCKPHOTO] Re: request advice on efficient keywording

lar...@larrybrownstein.com (Larry Brownstein) — Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:22:27 UT

Per
That was extremely helpful. You confirmed what I suspected that ALAMY
couldn't care less about whether there is a space or a semicolon
between the keywords. And I agree that there is no guarantee that
other search engines will treat the keyword phrases the same way.
Thanks.
-Larry
Larry Brownstein

[STOCKPHOTO] Re: Comp question to photographers in general.

verk...@sympatico.ca (Ed Verkaik) — Tue, 09 Jan 2007 15:07:25 UT

I may be wrong, but was assuming that if you displayed a higher quality jpeg
on a monitor, that the full gamut and file quality does not translate to the
screen. Do you think most monitors being used today show 100% of what is in
a file, regardless of the PS quality level chosen?
Ed Verkaik
------------------------------ ------------------------------ ----------