bit.listproc.stockphoto Google Group

in addition Best Of Shweta right

gilbert.zau...@suddenlink.net — Sat, 18 Oct 2008 09:05:35 UT

[link]

swinging underneath bit.listproc.stockphoto

will.h...@msn.com — Fri, 17 Oct 2008 20:53:43 UT

Lisette wrote on 17 Oct 2008 20:53:43 GMT:
[link]

targeting within bit.listproc.stockphoto

robette.ponci...@msn.com — Fri, 17 Oct 2008 20:13:08 UT

Russ wrote on 17 Oct 2008 20:13:08 GMT:
[link]

warn Utpal Dutt

amber.bes...@aol.com — Fri, 10 Oct 2008 07:50:03 UT

Russell wrote on 10 Oct 2008 07:50:03 GMT:
[link]

Shake that Laffy Taffy

marion.levint...@msn.com — Sun, 28 Sep 2008 03:14:52 UT

[link]

Charlene on Bharat TV tamely

don...@hotmail.com — Thu, 25 Sep 2008 17:31:20 UT

[link]

bollywood nudity for bit.listproc.stockphoto

dianna.just...@yahoo.com — Mon, 08 Sep 2008 06:51:06 UT

[link]

bit.listproc.stockphoto

rone...@bit.listproc.stockphoto — Tue, 24 Jul 2007 02:02:20 UT

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
back later, has a truly frightening potential for abuse.
George Orwell issued a warning.
He told us that freedom is too much taken for granted, that it needs to
be carefully watched and protected. His last word on the subject was a
plea to his readers: "Don't let it happen. It depends on you."

[STOCKPHOTO] Scanners for agencies

idmur...@totalise.co.uk (Ian Murray) — Mon, 15 Jan 2007 16:35:12 UT

Dear all,
I've found the thread about which cameras certain agencies list as
acceptable/non acceptable interesting. As I understand it Getty film
submissions need to be drum scanned or from a narrow range of expensive
high end scanners only. Do list members find that justifiable or do
some see it as overkill/an artificial barrier?

[STOCKPHOTO] Re: Manual focusing with Nikon 4000 / 5000 - focusing range

j...@johnfowler.ca (John Fowler) — Mon, 15 Jan 2007 14:48:51 UT

is
corner.
part
can
up
I don't understand this procedure. Where can I learn more about it
and learn how to apply it?
I'm using a 4000, for some years now. I select a focus point
depending on the image and go with auto everything else. No
complaints yet. Of course, I'm dealing primarily with

Re: [STOCKPHOTO] Re: Manual focusing with Nikon 4000 / 5000 - focusing range

duv...@verizon.net (Duvina) — Mon, 15 Jan 2007 12:01:54 UT

I've been hearing about this and was just talking to someone earlier today.
They told me the Nikons have focus issues and I was a little surprised by
this. I shoot with a Panasonic Lumix and it's got a 12x optical zoom, the
down side is I can't change lenses, but from what I've been hearing my lense

[STOCKPHOTO] Re: Manual focusing with Nikon 4000 / 5000 - focusing range

li...@harganonline.com (Jim Hargan) — Mon, 15 Jan 2007 07:11:56 UT

I would like to apologize to Jacques and the group for this late
posting.
I start by finding the high point and the low point. The high point is
usually off center a bit, and the low point is in the opposite corner.
If the difference between these is 20 or less, I just split the
difference. If the difference is more than 20 (my record is 45), part

Re: [STOCKPHOTO] Re: Getty

aye-...@comcast.net — Mon, 15 Jan 2007 04:58:16 UT

Thanks for your reply Ethan. Did you choose to be in the Lifesize collection or is that where they put you based on the images you sent them? Do you know if they are interested in travel images?
What kinds of images did you send them for your initial review?
Thanks
Maggie
-------------- Original message ----------------------

[STOCKPHOTO] Re: Getty

soundk...@yahoo.com (soundkite) — Mon, 15 Jan 2007 03:12:59 UT

Maggie,
I submitted 10 images to Getty's new Lifesize collection back in
November. I was given a contract within a few weeks of sending them
in... much faster than I expected. Perhaps Getty responded so fast
because they are trying to build the collection quickly. Getty also
has a special interest in one of my images, which may have

[STOCKPHOTO] Getty

aye-...@comcast.net — Sun, 14 Jan 2007 19:59:21 UT

I am just curius, has anyone been accepted to Getty recently? I'd like you apply but I wanted to know how easy it was to get in.
Thanks
Maggie
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]