Message from discussion
edible mushrooms
Received: by 10.114.25.19 with SMTP id 19mr1100531way.22.1239537969313;
Sun, 12 Apr 2009 05:06:09 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <koo...@hotkey.net.au>
Received: from mailout5.hotkey.net.au (camilla.hotkey.net.au [202.138.0.160])
by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id m37si1461230waf.0.2009.04.12.05.06.08;
Sun, 12 Apr 2009 05:06:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of koo...@hotkey.net.au designates 202.138.0.160 as permitted sender) client-ip=202.138.0.160;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of koo...@hotkey.net.au designates 202.138.0.160 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=koo...@hotkey.net.au
Received: from Cathy1 (unknown [210.50.248.201])
by mailout5.hotkey.net.au (Postfix) with SMTP id BBFD7390CF6
for <australian-plants-society-victoria-open-forum@googlegroups.com>; Sun, 12 Apr 2009 22:06:05 +1000 (EST)
Message-ID: <7F76AEE127FD42D5B550E28D369B4029@Cathy1>
From: "Cathy" <koo...@hotkey.net.au>
To: <australian-plants-society-victoria-open-forum@googlegroups.com>
Subject: edible mushrooms
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 22:05:11 +1000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_006E_01C9BBBA.BFDB47E0"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579
X-Hotkey-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-MailScanner-ID: BBFD7390CF6.9CB77
X-Hotkey-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-Hotkey-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam
X-Hotkey-MailScanner-From: koo...@hotkey.net.au
X-Spam-Status: No
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_006E_01C9BBBA.BFDB47E0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I quote from the publication Fungi Downunder
" While it is commonly believed that anything called a 'mushroom' is =
edible, and a 'toadstool' poisonous, this is a fallacy. . . . =
Importantly, it should be noted that fruit-bodies of many species are =
indeed poisonous, and there is no general rule for determining edibility =
or otherwise. Unless you have reliable advice . . ., it is best not to =
sample any unknown specimen, regardless of what it is called.
Cathy
------=_NextPart_000_006E_01C9BBBA.BFDB47E0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.6000.16809" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I quote from the publication <EM>Fungi=20
Downunder</EM></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>" While it is commonly believed that =
anything=20
called a 'mushroom' is edible, and a 'toadstool' poisonous, this is a=20
fallacy. . . . Importantly, it should be noted that =
fruit-bodies of=20
many species are indeed poisonous, and there is no general rule for =
determining=20
edibility or otherwise. Unless you have reliable advice . . ., it =
is best=20
not to sample any unknown specimen, regardless of what it is=20
called.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Cathy</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_006E_01C9BBBA.BFDB47E0--
|
